United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

(Rule 14a-101)

 

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

 

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)

 

Filed by the Registrant [x]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement

[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

[x] Definitive Proxy Statement

[ ] Definitive Additional Materials

[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

 

RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[x]No fee required.
[ ]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 
5)Total fee paid:

 

[ ]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

 

[ ]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

 

1)Amount previously paid:

 

 

2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 
3)Filing Party:

 

 
4)Date Filed:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 25, 201826, 2021

 

To the Stockholders of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.:

 

The 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), will be held via a live webcast at the offices of Clifford Chance US LLP, 31 West 52nd Street, New York, New York 10019,http://www.viewproxy.com/ROIREIT/2021/vm, on April 25, 2018,26, 2021, at 2:001:30 p.m., Eastern time, to consider and vote on the following matters:

 

(1)the election of eight directors to serve on the Company’s board of directors until the Company’s 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify;

 

(2)the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018;2021;

 

(3)the resolution to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;officers as described in the accompanying proxy statement; and

 

(4)the approval of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan; and

(5)the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof.

 

The close of business on February 27, 2018March 1, 2021 has been fixed by our board of directors as the record date for the determination of the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any postponements or adjournments thereof.

 

WeDue to the ongoing public health impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, limitations on gatherings of individuals as a result thereof, and in order to support the health and well-being of our stockholders, employees and the greater community, we will hold the Annual Meeting virtually, which will be conducted via a live webcast, and we hope that all of our stockholders who can do so will attend the Annual Meeting via the live webcast. In order to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, you must register by 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on April 25, 2021, by following the instructions in person.  the accompanying proxy statement. The virtual meeting has been designed to provide the same rights to participate as you would have at an in-person meeting. During the Annual Meeting, you may submit questions and will be able to vote your shares electronically.

Whether or not you plan to attend, in order to assure proper representation of your shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”), at the Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit your proxy voting instructions to the Company. By submitting your proxy voting instructions promptly, you can help the Company avoid the expense of follow-up mailings and ensure the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If you attend the Annual Meeting virtually, you may, if so desired, revoke your prior proxy voting instructions and vote your shares in person.online during the virtual meeting.

 

If you are a registered holder of shares of Common Stock as of the close of business on the record date, you may vote your shares of Common Stock in person atonline during the Annual Meeting or by submitting your proxy voting instructions to the Company.Company by following the instructions on your proxy card. If you hold shares of Common Stock in “street name” through a broker or other financial institution as of the close of business on the record date, you mustmay vote your shares of Common Stock online during the Annual Meeting by following the instructions in the accompanying proxy statement or you may follow the instructions provided by your broker or other financial institution regarding how to instruct your broker or financial institution to authorize a proxy to vote your shares of Common Stock.

 

Your proxy is being solicited by our board of directors. Our board of directors recommends that you vote “FOR” each nominee for director and “FOR” proposals 2 3 and 4.3.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors 

Stuart A. Tanz

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

San Diego, California

March 26, 20182021

 

Michael B. Haines

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

 

 

Table of Contents

Page

GENERAL MEETING INFORMATION1
2021 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY4
ESG Highlights7
PROPOSAL 1  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS10
PROPOSAL 2  RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF the company’s INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM14
PROPOSAL 3  ApprovAL, on an advisory basis, OF the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers15
COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS19
INFORMATION REGARDING OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS20
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE21
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION27
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS51
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT52
OTHER MATTERS53
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS53
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS54
MISCELLANEOUS54

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 25, 2018.26, 2021. The Proxy Statement and our 20172020 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at: http://www.viewproxy.com/roireit/20182021

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE 20182021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 25, 201826, 2021

GENERAL MEETING INFORMATION

 

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the board of directors of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., a Maryland corporation (the “Company,” “ROIC,” “we,” “our” or “us,”), for use at the Company’s 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) towill be held via a live webcast at the offices of Clifford Chance US LLP, 31 West 52nd Street, New York, New York 10019,http://www.viewproxy.com/ROIREIT/2021/vm, on April 25, 201826, 2021 at 2:001:30 p.m., Eastern time, or at any postponements or adjournments thereof.

Due to the ongoing public health impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, limitations on gatherings of individuals as a result thereof, and in order to support the health and well-being of our stockholders, employees and the greater community, we will hold the Annual Meeting virtually, which will be conducted via a live webcast, and we hope that all of our stockholders who can do so will attend the Annual Meeting via the live webcast. The virtual meeting has been designed to provide the same rights to participate as you would have at an in-person meeting. During the Annual Meeting, you may submit questions and will be able to vote your shares electronically. You may also submit questions during the registration process set forth below in advance of the Annual Meeting. The Company will respond to as many appropriate inquiries at the Annual Meeting as time allows and such questions and responses will be posted on our website www.roireit.net promptly following the Annual Meeting.

 

If you are a registered holder of shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”), as of the close of business on February 27, 2018March 1, 2021 (the “Record Date”), you may vote your shares of Common Stock in person atonline during the Annual Meeting or by submitting your proxy voting instructions to us.us by following the instructions on your proxy card. If you hold shares of Common Stock in “street name” through a broker or other financial institution as of the close of business on the Record Date, you mustmay vote your shares of Common Stock online during the Annual Meeting by following the instructions in this proxy statement or you may follow the instructions provided by your broker or other financial institution regarding how to instruct your broker or financial institution to authorize a proxy to vote your shares of Common Stock.

 

Shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies received by us prior to the Annual Meeting will be voted according to the instructions specified on such proxies. Any stockholder of record submitting voting instructions or a proxy retains the power to revoke such instructions or proxy at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting by (i) delivering prior to the Annual Meeting a written notice of revocation to Michael B. Haines, our Chief Financial Officer,Secretary, at Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92130, (ii) submitting a later dated proxy card, (iii) authorizing a proxy via the Internet or (iii)by telephone at a later date or (iv) by voting in person atonline during the Annual Meeting. Due to the various impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the potential for mail delays and government restrictions on and closures of workplaces, we encourage stockholders to submit a proxy via the Internet or by telephone. A stockholder submitting a notice of revocation by mail should provide sufficient time for delivery. Attending the Annual Meeting virtually will not automatically revoke a stockholder’s previously submitted voting instructions or proxy unless such stockholder votes in person atduring the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in “street name” and you desire to change your vote, you should contact the nominee holding shares for you (i.e., a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other intermediary) for instructions on how to do so.

If a proxy is properly authorized without specifying any voting instructions and not revoked prior to the Annual Meeting, the shares of Common Stock represented by such proxy will be voted FOR the election of the director nominees to serve on our board of directors until our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify, FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018,2021 and FOR the advisory resolution on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement and FOR the approval of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. Statement. As to any other business which may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof, the persons named as proxy holders on your proxy card will vote the shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies in their discretion.

 

-1-

Both stockholders of record and stockholders who hold their shares in “street name” will need to register to be able to attend the virtual Annual Meeting via live webcast, submit their questions during the virtual Annual Meeting and vote their shares electronically at the virtual Annual Meeting by following the instructions below.

If you are a stockholder of record, you must:

·First register at http://www.viewproxy.com/ROIREIT/2021 by 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on April 25, 2021. You will need to enter your name, phone number, email address, and control number (included on your proxy card) as part of the registration, following which, you will receive an email confirming your registration, as well as the password you will need to enter the Annual Meeting.

If you do not have your control number, you may still attend the Annual Meeting as a guest (non-stockholder) but you will not have the option to participate in or vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting.

·On the day of the Annual Meeting, if you have properly registered, you may enter the Annual Meeting by logging in using the password you received via email in your registration confirmation at http://www.viewproxy.com/ROIREIT/2021/vm (you will need the control number included on your proxy card).

·If you wish to vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting, you will need to visit www.AALvote.com/ROIC during the Annual Meeting while the polls are open (you will need the control number included on your proxy card).

If your shares are held in a “street name,” you must:

·Obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee.

·Register at http://www.viewproxy.com/ROIREIT/2021 by 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on April 25, 2021.

You will need to enter your name, phone number and email address, and provide a copy of the legal proxy (which may be uploaded to the registration website or sent via VirtualMeeting@viewproxy.com) as part of the registration, following which, you will receive an email confirming your registration, your virtual control number, as well as the password to attend the Annual Meeting.

·Please note, if you do not provide a copy of the legal proxy, you may still attend the Annual Meeting as a guest (non-stockholder) but you will not have the option to participate in or vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting.

·On the day of the Annual Meeting, if you have properly registered, you may enter the Annual Meeting by logging in using the password you received via email in your registration confirmation at http://www.viewproxy.com/ROIREIT/2021/vm (you will need the virtual control number assigned to you in your registration confirmation email to enter the Annual Meeting).

·If you wish to vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting, you will need to visit http://www.AALvote.com/ROIC during the Annual Meeting while the polls are open (you will need the virtual control number assigned to you in your registration confirmation email).

This Proxy Statement, the Notice of the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the related proxy card are first being sent and made available to stockholders on or about March 26, 2018.2021.

 

ANNUAL REPORTAnnual Report

 

This Proxy Statement is accompanied by our Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, including financial statements audited by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2020, and their report thereon, dated February 22, 2018.24, 2021.

 

VOTING SECURITIES AND RECORD DATE

-2-

Voting Securities and Record Date

 

Stockholders will be entitled to cast one vote for each share of Common Stock held of record at the close of business on the Record Date with respect to (i) the election of eight directors to serve on our board of directors until our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify, (ii) the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018,2021, (iii) the advisory resolution to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement (iv) the approval of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and (v)(iv) any other proposal for stockholder action that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof.

 

-1-

Abstentions and broker non-votes are each included in the determination of the number of shares present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner (i.e., a broker) does not vote on a particular proposal because such nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that particular matter and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. If you hold your shares in “street name” through a broker or other financial institution it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors or the advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement or the approval of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.Proxy. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), the only item to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting with respect to which a broker or nominee will be permitted to exercise voting discretion is the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.2021. Although our Common Stock trades on the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”), the NYSE rules affect us because most of the shares of Common Stock held in “street name” are held with NYSE member-brokers. Therefore, if you hold your shares of Common Stock in “street name” and you do not give the broker or nominee specific voting instructions on the election of the directors or the advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, or the approval of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, your shares will not be voted on those items, and a broker non-vote will occur.

 

Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of directors, the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP or the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers or the approval of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

 

The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of Common Stock entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting shall constitute a quorum. The disposition of business scheduled to come before the Annual Meeting, assuming a quorum is present, will require the following affirmative votes: (i) for the election of a director, a plurality of all the votes cast in the election of directors at the Annual Meeting; (ii) for the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, a majority of all the votes cast on the matter at the Annual Meeting; and (iii) for the advisory resolution on the compensation of our named executive officers, a majority of all the votes cast on the matter at the Annual Meeting; and (iv) for the approval of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, a majority of all the votes cast on the matter at the Annual Meeting.

 

As of the Record Date, we had issued and outstanding 112,544,925118,515,977 shares of Common Stock.

Stock issued and outstanding.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -2--3- 

 

20182021 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

This summary highlights certain information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement and does not encompass all the information that you should consider. This Proxy Statement should be read in its entirety before voting.

 

Fiscal 20172020 Performance Highlights

 

ROICDuring 2020, in the face of extraordinary circumstances due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company delivered another year of strong operating performance in 2017.and financial performance. We achieved significant growth incontinued the disciplined execution of our portfolio across ourstrategy focused on necessity-based community and neighborhood shopping centers on the West Coast, markets and continued to produce strong operating results and financial performance while maintaining a flexible and conservative financial position. Key highlights includewhich resulted in the following:

 

·Achieved growthExceptional operational performance in the retail REIT industry:

-$32.0 million of net income attributable to common stockholders ($0.27 per diluted share)

-$132.5 million in funds from operations (“FFO”)(1)

-90.6% of 5.6%total billed base rent during pandemic has been paid as of February 18, 2021 (2Q’20 - 4Q’20)

-96.8% of our gross leasable area (including 100% of anchor space) was leased at December 31, 2020, the 8th consecutive year above 96.0%

-1.2 million square feet of leases were executed, representing the 10th consecutive year of leasing approximately double the square footage originally scheduled to $1.14 per diluted shareexpire

-Achieved growth in same-space cash rents on new leases of 12.5% and 7.9% growth on renewals

-Awarded investment grade rating and stable outlook from Fitch Ratings, Inc.

-Awarded Best Retail REIT (U.S.) 2020 by CFI.co

 

·Completed ten acquisitions totaling approximately $357.6 millionMaintained our strong balance sheet:

 

·-Increased annual dividend by 4.2% to $0.75 from $0.72 per share

·97.5% of our gross leasable area was leased at December 31, 2017

·Increased size of our shopping center property portfolio by 11% to 10.4 million square feet

·Achieved same-store net operating income (“NOI”)(1) growth of 3.1%

·Raised $408.8 million of capital to fund our growth through the issuance of shares of common stock, operating partnership units, senior unsecured notes and an increase in borrowing capacity under our credit facility

·Approximately 90%96.5% of our total outstanding indebtedness was effectively fixed-rate(2) at year-end, a record for the Company, and approximately 92%94.5% of our gross leasable area was unencumbered at December 31, 20172020

________________

-Maintained 3.4x interest coverage

-Reduced outstanding debt by $36.6 million

·Continued execution of strategic growth:

-Continued focus on densification initiatives

-Continued development of our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) programs

-Continued focus on acquiring shopping centers where our team has the opportunity to build value

(1)For a description of FFO, market capitalization and NOI, see “Compensation“Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.Analysis—Elements of Executive Compensation.”

 

(2)Represents indebtedness that bears interest at a fixed-rate or is subject to interest rate swap agreements pursuant to which the Company makes fixed-rate payments.

 

We believe that the value creation produced from an investment in real estate should be assessed over a long-term period and our strategy has focused on and continues to focus on long-term value creation. During 2017,2020, in the face of challenging business conditions in the broader retail market,addition to creating value through our property operations and leasing activities, we continued to enhance the disciplined executionlong-term competitive position and intrinsic value of our strategy focused onportfolio through the implementation of strategic initiatives. These initiatives include our densification initiatives and development of our ESG programs. The economic benefits of our activities in these areas during 2020 will not be realized until subsequent years. However, we believe these initiatives, when combined with the strength of our in-place portfolio of necessity-based community and neighborhood shopping centers on the West Coast. We increasedCoast that we have assembled over the size of our portfolio by selectively acquiring ten additional shopping centers located in our target markets, strengthened our already sound balance sheet and, through our operating and leasing initiatives, continued our track record of producing strong operating results while enhancing the long-term, intrinsic value of our properties. Our operational success has translated into strong total and relativepast decade, will help position us to continue to generate attractive returns for stockholders over the long-term. The following table sets forth our stockholders, as indicated intotal stockholder return (“TSR”) performance over the table below.

one, three, five and seven-year periods ended December 31, 2020.

 

-4-

Total Stockholder Return(1)ROIC:

ROIC:           Retail Opportunity

Investments Corp.

SNL:             SNL U.S. REIT Retail Index

MSCI:           MSCI US REIT Index

Peers(2):      Executive Compensation Peer Group Median

1-Year 3-Year 5-Year 7-Year     SNL:SNL US REIT
 Retail Index
MSRI 5.07% ROIC 33.0% ROIC 89.2% ROIC 165.3%MSRI:Morgan Stanley
 ROICMSCI -2.0%-7.57%  MSRI 17.0%MSCI 10.99%  MSRI 56.3%MSCI 26.65%  MSRI 100.6%MSCI 69.29% 
ROIC -22.97%REIT IndexROIC -25.56%ROIC -10.82%ROIC 17.66%
SNL-5.0%-26.07%SNL -27.07%SNL 0.0%-30.60%SNL 31.8% SNL 86.4%Peers(2):Executive Compensation-7.65%
Peers-7.8%-33.05%Peers-7.6%-41.65%Peers -48.90%Peers 20.3% Peers 30.1%Peer Group Median-26.14%

____________

(1)The table above compares the cumulative total return on our Common Stock over the one, three, five and seven-year periods ended December 31, 20172020 to the cumulativetotal return of comparable indices and our executive compensation peer group, assuming a $100 investment on January 1, 20112013 and assuming all dividends werehave been reinvested.

(2)For more information about our executive compensation peer group, see “Compensation“Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Setting Executive Compensation—Peer Group.”

 

Stockholder Outreach and Engagement

 

We believe that fostering long-term relationships with our stockholders and maintaining their trust is a key ROIC objective, and we recognize the value of listening to and understanding their views about our business. During 2017,2020, we continued our stockholder outreach activities, dialoguing and meeting with key institutional stockholders, in an effort to proactively address important issues.

 

-3-

·Our Chief Executive Officer, Stuart A. Tanz, and other members of our senior management team were in regular contact with stockholders during 20172020 and conducted in excess of 200139 scheduled investor meetings to discuss a broad range of topics, including executive compensation.

 

·We considered the modifications thatour executive compensation program implemented by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) implemented to our executive compensation program in 2016 and 2017 and the results of last year’srecent non-binding, advisory votevotes on the compensation of our named executive officers. At each of our 2016 and 2017 Annual Meetings,last four annual stockholder meetings, stockholders showed strong support for our executive compensation program, with approximately 97%more than 97.5% of the votes cast approving our advisory resolution at each meeting.

 

·Based on feedback received during the year and the strong support that stockholders showed for our executive compensation program in the 20172020 advisory “say on pay” vote, the Compensation Committee maintained the principal elements of our executive compensation program when setting compensation for 2017.2021 while making certain adjustments in response to market dynamics for retail REITs.

 

Executive Compensation Highlights

 

We are pleased that stockholders strongly supported our executive compensation program in the 20172020 advisory “say on pay” vote, with approximately 97%97.5% of the votes cast approving our advisory resolution. We attribute this result to the Compensation Committee’s commitment to designing and implementing an executive compensation program that aligns executive compensation with Company performance and the creation of sustainable stockholder value, and view it as an indication that stockholders are supportive of the Compensation Committee’s approach to executive compensation and our responsiveness to investor concerns.

 

-5-

Our executive compensation program includes the following key features which have been implemented by the Compensation Committee as follows:

 

What We DoHighlights
Formulaic annual cash incentive bonus program tied to rigorous objective performance criteria

-        85%For 2021, 80% of our Chief Executive Officer’s annual cash incentive cash bonus opportunity iswill be based solely on the achievement of objective Company performance criteria, with 15%20% determined at the Compensation Committee’s discretion based on a subjective review of overall Company and individual performance

-       For the 2018 performance year, the objective Company performance criteria will represent 90% of our Chief Executive Officer’s incentive cash bonus opportunity

 -        Use Company performance criteria that emphasize the achievement of operating and financial metrics that drive stockholder value creation, including FFO per share and dividend growth
Equity compensation program linked to long-term performance and designed to promote retention-        Allocate 50% of stock grants to performance-based equity awards and 50% to time-based equity awards
-        Performance-basedVesting criteria for performance-based equity awards require thefor 2020 to retain incorporation of achievement of both absolute and relative TSR performance measures in order for the maximum amount of awards to be earned
-       In order to earn the maximum award amount, in respect of the absolute and relative TSR components, the Company must achieve absolute TSR equal to or greater than 30% and TSR must rank at or above the 70th percentile of the performance peer group, respectively, in each case measured over a three-year cumulative period
-4-

What We DoHighlightsESG milestones
Strong corporate governance standards

-        Require a “double trigger” for severance payments upon a change in control

-        No excise tax gross-up provisions

-        Prohibit hedging or pledging of Company securities

-        Maintain stock ownership guidelines for our named executive officers and directors

-        Employ a majority voting policy for the election of directors in uncontested elections

-        Use an independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors

-        Prohibit the repricing of stock options without stockholder approval

 

For a detailed description of our executive compensation program, see “Compensation“Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -5--6-

ESG Highlights

Our long-standing commitment to operating responsibly and sustainably is evidenced by our exceptional performance as a retail REIT and the strong relationships we have fostered in our neighborhoods and communities. We published our first Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Report in 2020 which can be found on our website www.roireit.net. This report contains expanded data and information about our approach to ESG management and performance and is aligned with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board and Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures frameworks. No information contained on our website is part of or incorporated into this Proxy Statement.

Governance Practices

Our board of directors takes an active role in overseeing our ESG strategy, initiatives, and programs. In 2019, we formalized our commitment to integrate ESG and sustainability into our wider business strategy through the establishment of an ESG Management Committee reporting to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our board of directors. We are actively implementing ESG initiatives that we believe will have the greatest impact on our business and stakeholders.

Board Oversight of ESG

Our board of directors oversees our ESG strategy, initiatives, and programs. As a committee of our board of directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees ESG strategy development and takes our stockholders’ and other stakeholders’ perspectives into consideration when formulating ESG practices. Our ESG Management Committee includes members from our executive, investor relations, special projects, and information technology teams. The ESG Management Committee is responsible for implementing our ESG strategy and providing updates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The ESG Committee met regularly throughout 2020.

ESG Milestones in Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee considered the design and implementation of our ESG strategy and decided to incorporate the achievement of ESG milestones into the vesting criteria for performance-based equity awards. The Compensation Committee determined that the achievement of ESG milestones would replace the attainment of densification entitlements for performance-based equity awards in respect of performance for the year ended December 31, 2019 (granted in 2020). This metric was retained for performance-based equity awards in respect of performance for the year ended December 31, 2020 (granted in 2021) For a detailed description of our executive compensation program, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Conduct was designed to assist directors, officers and employees in complying with the law, and in resolving moral and ethical issues that may arise in complying with our policies and procedures. Some areas addressed by the Code of Conduct include: conflicts of interest; confidentiality; internal accounting controls, fair dealing, discrimination and harassment; and health and safety. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is more fully described below under “Corporate Governance—Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.”

Cybersecurity

With increasing risks and a constantly changing cyber environment, we ensure we have a well-formulated architecture for protection and maintenance of our information technology (“IT”) resources – to safeguard the operations of our business as well as the safety and privacy of our employees and our tenants. Critical components we employ to safeguard our IT environment include: perimeter and physical security, email and web filtering services, endpoint protection, access controls, backups and data redundancy, multifactor authentication on critical systems, and formal training programs for our employees concerning IT security. Our management team reports quarterly, or more frequently if necessary, to our board of directors regarding IT security matters. In addition, the Compensation Committee determined that cybersecurity assessment management would comprise a portion of the annual incentive bonus plan for Messrs. Haines and Schoebel for the year ended December 31, 2020. For a detailed description of our executive compensation program, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

-7-

Policy Against Money Laundering

We are committed to minimizing the risk of our operations being used by money launderers and to preventing any financing of terrorism. We comply with all applicable anti-money laundering laws and we will not knowingly do business with anyone who we suspect of being connected with criminal or terrorist activity or who is subject to applicable trade sanctions. ROIC’s employees, officers and directors are required to immediately report any suspicious activities to our Compliance Officer.

Environmental Stewardship and Risk Management

We recognize the environmental impact of our operations as a diverse portfolio of necessity-based retail properties. We are committed to developing a process to track and review our environmental impact from landlord-controlled common areas and, to the extent feasible, encouraging tenants to reduce their environmental footprints and to operate sustainably. In 2019, we received IREM® Certified Sustainable Property certification at the Fallbrook Shopping Center, our largest asset, demonstrating our continued sustainability performance in energy, water, health, purchasing and management.

·Energy management: Energy management measures that have been implemented and/or are planned include LED lighting upgrades in common areas and the solicitation of bids to install on-site renewable energy (solar with battery storage where feasible) at selected properties.

·Electric vehicle (“EV”) charging stations: We currently have 14 EV charging stations at four properties and we are working toward adding more EV charging stations with a number of anchor tenants that have lease rights to parking spaces. We plan to add additional charging stations at multiple properties in 2021.

·Waste management: We encourage our employees and third-party contractors to engage in sound waste management practices, covering issues such as hazardous and non-hazardous waste generation, reuse, recycling, composting, recovery, incineration, landfill, and on-site storage that complies with local laws and codes.

·Water management: Approximately 41% of our portfolio (by floor area) is located in regions with extremely high or high baseline water stress, and therefore we are committed to implementing water stewardship best practices across our portfolio. We plan to have at least 80% of our portfolio’s water usage managed by irrigation systems that minimize water use. At properties where we have completed water upgrade efforts so far, we have seen our water usage decrease by approximately 15%.

·Biodiversity and habitat: We aim to minimize any potential impact our operations may have on wildlife, endangered species, ecosystems services, and habitat management through implementing strategies directly or through third-party contractors. Some strategies include managing snow and ice in ways that limit degradation of water quality, maintaining vegetative cover to prevent erosion, and reducing fertilizer use to only as needed for plant health applications based on soil testing.

·Indoor and outdoor environmental quality: We strive to maintain healthy indoor and outdoor environments at the properties we own and operate by, among others, preventative maintenance, green cleaning, and no smoking policies.

·Procurement and sourcing: We consider adopting sustainable procurement and material sourcing practices for common areas, on a property-by-property basis for existing, as well as, new construction and major renovation projects.

·Data tracking of metrics: We benchmark and track our greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions for common areas using all attainable utility data for energy consumption or management of energy from renewable and non-renewable sources.

-8-

·Resilience to catastrophes and disasters: We have a comprehensive Disaster Recovery/Business Resumption Plan in place that includes how to respond to extreme weather events such as earthquakes, floods, fires, and pandemics. Less than 3% of our portfolio is located in 100-year flood zones.

·Acquisitions: We include several ESG considerations in our property acquisition criteria. Some topics covered in our information request include: building safety; energy efficiency; GHG emissions; water supply and efficiency; access to public transportation; and compliance with regulatory requirements.

Environmental Targets

In 2020, we set measurable and time-bound reduction targets for common area energy, water, waste, and GHG emissions. We will continue to report our progress against these targets in future communications.

Social Responsibility

Supporting our employees, our tenants, and our communities is at the heart of our business model. Our properties provide essential services and places to gather people in meaningful ways and we strive to impact all of our stakeholders positively through engagement and feedback.

·Diversity and inclusion: We value and advance a diverse and inclusive workplace and believe that our success is dependent upon the diverse backgrounds and perspectives of our employees and directors. We strive to create equal opportunities for all current and future employees and to build a culture that is collaborative, diverse, supportive and inclusive. We are proud that approximately 70% of our workforce comprises women. Furthermore, our long-term incentive plan’s ESG metrics include holding diversity and inclusion training for employees annually.

·Employee training and development: We support the continual development of our employees by providing educational and training opportunities, including accounting and continuing education classes, professional certifications, software training, and industry workshops and seminars, to help advance their personal and professional growth and skills, and to build our internal capacity for growth and development.

·Equal opportunity workplace: We are committed to equal opportunity and we work to maintain workplaces that are free from discrimination or harassment on the basis of race, color, religion, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or expression, national origin, age, disability, military or veteran status, genetic information, or other statuses or characteristics protected by law.

·Anti-retaliation: Employees are encouraged to report any acts of discrimination or harassment to the Chief Executive Officer, Compliance Officer, or any member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board. Employees may report confidentially to the Compliance Officer by email at auditcommitteehotline@roireit.net. Any kind of retaliation against employees for raising these issues is strictly prohibited and will not be tolerated.

·Human Rights Policy: We aim to conduct operations that are consistent with the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. We do not tolerate the use of any form of child labor, forced or compulsory labor, and/or violations of labor standards and working conditions and human rights. Our Human Rights Policy covers topics such as: workplace security; forced labor and human trafficking; work hours, wages, and benefits; freedom of association and collective bargaining; and employee training and reporting. Further detail on our Human Rights Policy is available on our website www.roireit.net.

·Tenant engagement: We undertake several tenant engagement initiatives across our properties that aim to improve the satisfaction and retention rate of our tenants.

-9-

·Employee wellness and benefits: The physical and mental health and wellness of our employees is paramount. We provide employees with competitive compensation, including cash bonuses and equity awards and a wide range of benefits including comprehensive medical and dental insurance coverage, short and long term disability benefits, a 401(k) retirement program and matching, paid maternity, paternity and adoptive leave and vacation, sick and personal leave, flexible work arrangements, flexible savings accounts, and other benefits.

·Community engagement: Our properties provide essential services to the communities in which they are located and we understand that they play an important role in making these communities better places to live and work. We are committed to making a positive impact in the communities in which our properties are located and engage in community activities such as hosting and/or sponsoring free or not-for-profit led community events at our properties throughout the year.

COVID-19

As an owner and operator of shopping centers with essential services, during the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been committed to serving the needs of our employees, tenants, and their customers and we have focused on their as well as our health and business continuity. Some of the actions we have taken since March 2020 include:

·Safety: Established new safety protocols and procedures at all of our properties, including increasing cleaning protocols, addressing the protection of tenants during cleaning, establishing physical distancing procedures, requiring facial coverings, providing personal protective equipment and cleaning supplies for employees who needed to be onsite, and adding an ultraviolet system to all HVAC units at our offices.

·Employees: Asked all employees to begin working from home beginning March 16th, 2020 and following health and safety stay-at-home orders per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.

·Tenants: Commenced rent deferment discussions with our tenants and assisted tenants in identifying local, state and federal resources that may be available to support their businesses and employees during the pandemic, including stimulus funds that may be available under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 or additional stimulus or relief packages implemented by local, state or federal governments. Additionally, in order to assist our tenants in remaining open and operating, we offered aid to expand outdoor operations (in accordance with state guidelines), utilizing shaded and broad sidewalk areas, existing courtyard space, and converting lawn and parking stalls into private, umbrellaed spaces for tenants to operate all while procuring key items needed to create outdoor usable spaces for tenants, including umbrellas, partitions, space heaters and wind barriers.

·Operations: Successfully executed our business continuity plan with no disruption to our core financial, operational, and IT systems.

-10- 

 

PROPOSAL 1



ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Board of Directors

 

Our board of directors is currently comprised of eightnine directors: Richard A. Baker, Angela K. Ho, Michael J. Indiveri, Edward H. Meyer, Lee S. Neibart, Charles J. Persico, Laura H. Pomerantz, Stuart A. Tanz and Eric S. Zorn. In accordance with our Articles of Amendment and Restatementcharter (the “Charter”) and Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), each director holds office until our next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualifies, or until the director’s earlier resignation, death or removal.

 

Mr. Meyer, a long-tenured independent director, has advised our board of directors that he will not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting upon expiration of his current term. Mr. Meyer’s leadership, business acumen and invaluable contributions over the years have been instrumental in the company’s growth and success and Mr. Meyer will continue to serve the Company as a director emeritus.

On February 23, 2021, our board of directors elected Ms. Angela K. Ho to become a new independent director effective March 1, 2021. In connection with this election, our board of directors temporarily increased the size of our board of directors by one director until the Annual Meeting when Mr. Meyer does not stand for re-election. The size of our board of directors will be reduced by one director when Mr. Meyer does not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our board of directors (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”), with the exception of Mr. Meyer who is not standing for re-election to our board of directors, each of our current directors, Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Meyer, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Ms.Mses. Ho and Pomerantz, has been nominated by our board of directors to stand for election as directors by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting to serve until our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify.

 

We seek to have a board of directors representing diverse educational backgrounds and different work and life experiences that provide a range of insights into the financial, governmental or legal matters that are relevant to our business and to our status as a publicly owned company. We believe that, as a group, the nominees bring a diverse range of perspectives that contribute to the effectiveness of our board as a whole and the oversight that our board of directors provides to our senior management team. The procedures and considerations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in recommending qualified director candidates are described below under “Corporate Governance—Identification of Director Candidates” in this Proxy Statement. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our board of directors concluded that each of our director nominees should be nominated for election based on the qualifications and experience described in the biographical information below under “Nominees for Election as Directors.”

 

It is intended that the shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies will be voted by the persons named therein as proxy holders FOR the election of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Meyer, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Ms.Mses. Ho and Pomerantz as directors, unless otherwise instructed. If the candidacy of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Meyer, Neibart, Persico, Tanz or Zorn, or Ms.Mses. Ho or Pomerantz should, for any reason, be withdrawn prior to the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted by the proxy holders in favor of such substituted candidates (if any) as shall be nominated by our board of directors. Our board of directors has no reason to believe that, if elected, Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Meyer, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Ms.Mses. Ho and Pomerantz will be unable or unwilling to serve as directors.

 

Nominees for Election as Directors

 

The following information is furnished regarding the nominees for election as directors as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

 

Richard A. Baker, 52,55, the Chairman of our board of directors, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007, as Executive Chairman of our board of directors between 2009 and 2012 and as Non-Executive Chairman from 2012 until present. Mr. Baker is the Chief Governour and Executive Chairman of the Hudson’s Bay Company, a diversified North American retail organization, which owns and operates Lord & Taylor, Saks, Inc., and the Hudson’s Bay Company. FromSince 1988, until 2005, Mr. Baker has served in various capacities, including President, Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President and is now Chairman of National Realty & Development Corp., a real estate development company owned by him together with his father, Robert C. Baker, who was formerly one of our directors.company. National Realty & Development Corp. owns and manages a real estate portfolio which includes shopping centers and corporate business centers located in 20 states. National Realty & Development Corp.’s tenants include prominent retailers such as Walmart, Kohl’s, Lowe’s, Galleria Kaufhof, The Home Depot, Sears, Staples, Supervalu and T.J. Maxx. Mr. Baker received a B.S. in Hotel Administration from Cornell University and serves on the Dean’s Advisory Board of the hotel and real estate program.program and as a Trustee of the university. We believe Mr. Baker’s significant prior experience as a founder, an executive officer and a director of numerous real estate companies makes him qualified to serve as a director.

 

-11-

Angela K. Ho, 37, has served as one of our directors since March 2021. Ms. Ho has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of OceanFirst Bank since 2016. From 2012 to 2016, she served as Vice President and Controller at Northfield Bank and from 2010 to 2012 she served as Accounting Policy Manager at Signature Bank. Prior to that she worked at KPMG in the New York Financial Services Practice from 2006 to 2010. Ms. Ho is a New York Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Global Management Accountant. She is an active member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and currently serves on the AICPA Governing Council. Ms. Ho has been awarded American Banker’s 2020 Most Powerful Women in Banking: Next List, Asian American Business Development Center’s 2018 Outstanding 50 Asian Americans in Business, and New Jersey Bankers Association’s 2015 New Leaders in Banking. Ms. Ho received a B.S. in Accounting from University of Massachusetts Amherst and an M.B.A. from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. The Company believes that Ms. Ho’s extensive experience in the banking and accounting industries makes her qualified to serve as a director.

Michael J. Indiveri, 65,68, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007. He is a principal of Michael J. Indiveri, CPA LLC, a licensed certified public accounting firm that provides senior level accounting services to public and private financial and accounting consulting services.institutions. From June 2011 to December 2011, Mr. Indiveri provided these financial and accounting consulting services through The Indiveri Group, LLC, a real estate investment firm, where he has served as President since 2007. He was an Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hudson Valley Holding Corp. (NYSE: HVB) and its principal subsidiary Hudson Valley Bank from May 2013 to June 2015. From 2007 to 2011, Mr. Indiveri served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Amalgamated Bank in New York. From 1997 until 2007, Mr. Indiveri served as the Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of City & Suburban Federal Savings Bank, where he was also a director. From 1994 to 1997, Mr. Indiveri served as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of New York Federal Savings Bank. Mr. Indiveri received a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and an M.B.A. from Fordham University. We believe Mr. Indiveri’s experience at Hudson Valley Holding Corp. and his prior experience at Amalgamated Bank in New York, including as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Investment Committee and Chairman of the Asset Liability Management Committee, makes him qualified to serve as a director.

 

-6-

Edward H. Meyer, 91, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007. Since 2007, Mr. Meyer has served as Chief Executive Officer of Ocean Road Advisors, Inc., an investment management firm. From 1970 to 2006, Mr. Meyer was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Grey Global Group, one of the leading global advertising and marketing agencies. Prior to becoming Chairman, he was President of Grey from 1968 to 1970. He began his career at Bloomingdale’s. Mr. Meyer retired from the Board of Directors of Harman International Industries, Inc. (NYSE: HAR) in December 2016 after 26 years. Mr. Meyer previously served on the Board of Directors of May Department Stores for 17 years, National Cinemedia, Inc. (NASDAQ: NCMI) for 7 years and The Jim Pattison Group. He also served as a director of Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. from 1991 to 2010. Mr. Meyer serves as a Trustee of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, the Board of Overseers of Weill Cornell Medicine and the Film Society of Lincoln Center, and as President of the Edward & Sandra Meyer Foundation, Inc. Mr. Meyer received a B.A. in Economics from Cornell University. We believe Mr. Meyer’s significant prior experience as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Grey Global Group and a director of a number of public companies makes him qualified to serve as a director.

Lee S. Neibart, 67,70, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007 and, until 2009, served as our President. Mr. Neibart is a founder of NRDC Real Estate Advisors, LLC and NRDC Equity Partners LLC. He isMr. Neibart has been the Chief Executive Officer of HBS Global Properties, Inc. since 2013. Mr. Neibart has also been the Chairman and a Senior Partner of Trinity Investments since September 2016. From 2013 until June 2018, he was a Senior Partner and the Chairman of the Real Estate Group of Ares Management LLC. From 1993 until July 2013, Mr. Neibart was the Global Chief Executive Officer of AREA Property Partners, formerly Apollo Real Estate Advisors. From 1979 to 1993, Mr. Neibart worked at the Robert Martin Company, a real estate development and management firm, most recently as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Neibart is a director of Hudson’s Bay Company. Mr. Neibart serves on the Advisory Board of The Real Estate Institute of New York University. He is a past President of the New York Chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Parks. Mr. Neibart received a B.A. from the University of Wisconsin and an M.B.A. from the New York University School of Business. We believe Mr. Neibart’s significant prior experience as a founder, an executive officer and a director of numerous real estate companies makes him qualified to serve as a director.

 

Charles J. Persico, 78,81, has served as one of our directors since 2009. Mr. Persico is currently the President of Perbar Corp. and was previously the President of Perbar Sales Corp. and has been actively involved in various phases of the real estate industry, including development, construction and management, for over 3846 years. He has participated in the development, ownership and management of over 2,500 apartment units in the New York metropolitan area as well as over one million square feet of retail and commercial developments. His present portfolio consists of mainly retail developments. He has managed properties for Metropolitan Life, Aetna Insurance Company, Connecticut Mutual Insurance, Roosevelt Savings Bank and Peoples Westchester Savings Bank. Mr. Persico was a member of the Westchester County and New York State Board of Realtors and of local, state and national builders organizations. He was formerly on the Board of Directors of the following organizations: City & Suburban Federal Savings Bank for over ten years serving on the Mortgage Committee, Audit and Finance Committee and also the Planning and Development Committee, Westchester County Association (a business development organization represented by such companies as IBM, PepsiCo, Chase Bank and many other large publicly traded corporations) and Westchester Business Partnership. He was also a member of the B.P.O. Elks, Scarsdale Chapter, a prior president and chairman of the Builders Institute of Westchester and Putnam Counties (a 2,400 member organization), a New York State Commissioner of the Hudson River Valley Commission, founder and first President of the Exchange Club of the Town of Greenburgh, past member of the board of trustees of Elizabeth Seton College and of the Advisory Board of Iona College; Westchester County Commission Christopher Columbus Quincentennial, Board Member of the American Lyme Disease Foundation, and the Real Estate Tax Review Board of the Town of Greenburgh, New York (60,000 population). Mr. Persico received a B.S. in Real Estate from New York University. We believe Mr. Persico’s significant prior experience as President of Perbar Sales Corp. and active involvement in various phases of the real estate industry makes him qualified to serve as a director.

 

 -7--12- 

 

Laura H. Pomerantz, 70,73, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007. In 2014, Ms. Pomerantz was appointed Vice Chairman and Head of Strategic Accounts at Cushman & Wakefield. Ms. Pomerantz is a Principal and founding partner of Laura Pomerantz Real Estate, LLC, founded in April of 2013, and has been an executive in the Real Estate industry for over 2026 years. She was a Founding Partner and Principal at PBS Gould Venture, LLC, d/b/a PBS Real Estate, LLC (“PBS Real Estate”), a boutique firm offering commercial real estate advisory solutions to both tenants and landlords. Prior to joining PBS Real Estate in 2001, Ms. Pomerantz was a Senior Managing Director at Newmark & Company Real Estate. Prior to joining Newmark & Company Real Estate in 1996, Ms. Pomerantz was Executive Managing Director of S.L. Green (NYSE: SLG) and prior to that she was the Executive Vice President of The Leslie Fay Companies, Inc., having responsibility for supervising several of its upscale fashion divisions. She was with The Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. for over 18 years and served on the company’sits Board of Directors. She is a member of the Carnegie Hall Board of Trustees and is a director at WIN (Women in Need)the Richard Tucker Foundation and G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (NASDAQ: GIII) and is a former director as well as a former member of the Nomination & Governance and Compensation Committees of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (NYSE: CLI). Ms. Pomerantz received an A.B.A. in Business Administration from Miami Dade Community College. We believe Ms. Pomerantz’s significant prior experience as a Principal at PBS Real Estate and at other real estate and retail companies makes her qualified to serve as a director.

 

Stuart A. Tanz, 59,62, has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and one of our directors since 2009. Mr. Tanz was the Chief Executive Officer of United Income Properties, Inc. from 2006 to 2009 and its Chief Operating Officer and President from 1988 to 1992. United Income Properties, Inc. was a privately owned retail real estate development company in Southern California which developed, owned and operated various shopping centers in Southern California and now owns, manages and operates approximately 2,2501,150 self-storage units and a retailan apartment property. From 1997 to 2006, Mr. Tanz was the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc., during which period its total market capitalization increased by 795% from $447 million to over $4 billion. Mr. Tanz oversaw and administered all aspects of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc.’s business, management, finance and personnel and led its $146 million initial public offering on the NYSE and ultimately in the sale of the company for $4.1 billion to Kimco Realty Corp. (NYSE: KIM) in November 2006. From 1992 to December 1996, Mr. Tanz was a director of Revenue Properties Company Limited and was the Co-Chief Executive Officer from May 1996 to August 1997. Revenue Properties Company Limited was a publicly traded company on the Toronto Stock Exchange that was the parent company of Pan Pacific Development Corp., where Mr. Tanz was the President and Chief Operating Officer from 1992 to 1997. From 1982 to 1988, Mr. Tanz was the Director of Acquisitions of Southern California at Bramalea Limited, based in Toronto, Canada, and Bramalea California Inc. Mr. Tanz is a member of the Advisory Council for the University of Southern California Lusk Center for Real Estate and Chairman of the Advisory council for the Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mr. Tanz is a member of International Council of Shopping Centers and Young Presidents Organization. In 1998, National Real Estate Investors named Mr. Tanz as one of the country’s top real estate executives under the age of 40 and in 2001 Mr. Tanz was awarded San Diego’s Ernst & Young Real Estate Entrepreneur of the Year in real estate. Mr. Tanz received a B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Southern California, Marshall School of Business. We believe Mr. Tanz’s significant prior public company experience as the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. makes him qualified to serve as a director.

 

Eric S. Zorn, 69,72, has served as one of our directors since March, 2012. Mr. Zorn is currently Chairman of ESZ LLC, which is an International Real Estate Consulting Firm. It performs work for clients around the globe. From 2012 to 2015, Mr. Zorn served as a consultant to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and was engaged in Walmart’s Asian growth strategy. Until retiring in 2012, Mr. Zorn had served as President of Walmart Realty since 2002 and as an Executive Vice President of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. since 2005. He led teams responsible for new store growth, store remodeling and property management, merchandise planning, procurement and allocation of capital among markets targeted for growth. Over a 15-year period, Mr. Zorn oversaw the opening of more than 3,200 Walmart stores in the United States, and also oversaw the strategy for disposition of excess real estate. Mr. Zorn joined Walmart in 1993 as Regional Vice President of Operations, becoming a Senior Vice President of Walmart Realty in 1995, after spending 22 years at the Jamesway Corporation, including nine years as Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Zorn is on the Executive Committee of the Board of Visitors for MD Anderson Cancer Center. Mr. Zorn previously served as Trustee of the International Council of Shopping Centers, and has served several other organizations in various capacities, including the Foundation Board of Trustees for Mercy Hospital in Rogers, Arkansas, Professional Women in Construction (New York chapter) and the Susan G. Komen Foundation (NWA Chapter). Mr. Zorn studied history at Fairleigh Dickinson University. We believe that Mr. Zorn’s extensive experience, including leadership of real estate acquisitions and property management for Walmart Realty, makes him qualified to serve as a director.

 

 -8--13- 

 

Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR the election of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Meyer, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Ms.Mses. Ho and Pomerantz as directors.

 

A plurality of all of the votes cast onin the proposalelection of directors at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary to elect a director. Proxies solicited by our board of directors will be voted FOR the election of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Meyer, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Ms.Mses. Ho and Pomerantz, unless otherwise instructed. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote on this proposal, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

 

We have a majority voting policy for the election of directors. In an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election is required to tender his or her resignation to our board of directors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is required to promptly consider the resignation and make a recommendation to our board of directors with respect to the tendered resignation. Our board of directors is required to take action with respect to this recommendation. Any director who tenders his or her resignation to our board of directors will not participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration or action by our board of directors regarding whether to accept such tendered resignation. The policy is more fully described below under “Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Guidelines—Majority Voting Policy.”

 

In accordance with our Charter and Bylaws, vacancies occurring on our board of directors, as a result of death, resignation, removal of a director, an increase in the authorized number of directors or otherwise, may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy shall serve for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor is elected and qualifies.

 

There are no family relationships, as defined under Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regulations, among any of our directors or executive officers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -9--14- 

 

PROPOSAL 2



RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF the company’s
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Our board of directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.2021. Our board of directors is requesting that our stockholders ratify this appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.

 

The report of Ernst & Young LLP on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 20162019 did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

 

Neither our Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of our board of directors’ appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, our board of directors is submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event that ratification of this appointment of independent registered public accounting firm is not approved at the Annual Meeting, our board of directors will review its future appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, our board of directors, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests.

 

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be provided with an opportunity to make a statement if so desired and to respond to appropriate inquiries from stockholders.

 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

 

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees (including related expenses) billed to us for professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.

 

 Fiscal Year Ended December 31, Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
 

2017(4)

 

2016(4)

 2020(3) 2019(3)
Audit Fees(1) $898,534  $886,063 
Audit Fees(1) $772,000  $850,906 
Audit-Related Fees  —   —   —   — 
Tax Fees(2)  315,990   176,000 
Tax Fees(2)  326,400   274,930 
All Other Fees(3)  2,000   1,235   —   — 
Total $1,216,524  $1,063,298  $1,098,400  $1,125,836 

______________________________________

(1)20172020 and 20162019 Audit Fees include fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP in respect of: (i) the audit of the consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K and services attendant to, or required by, statute or regulation; (ii) reviews of the interim consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; (iii) consents and other services related to SEC and other regulatory filings and communications; and (iv) accounting consultation attendant to the audit.

 

(2)20172020 and 20162019 Tax Fees include tax compliance, tax planning, tax advisory and related tax services provided by Ernst & Young LLP.

 

(3)Includes amounts billed for annual subscription to Ernst and Young LLP’s online resource library.

(4)Does not include fees relating to the audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting of $126,939$122,450 and $112,620$126,931 paid to Berdon LLP in the fiscal years ended December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 2016,2019, respectively.

 

The charter of the Audit Committee of our board of directors (the “Audit Committee”) provides that the Audit Committee shall review and pre-approve the engagement fees and the terms of all auditing and non-auditing services to be provided by our external auditors which audit our financial statements and evaluate the effect thereof on the independence of such external auditors. All audit, tax and other services provided to us by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, were reviewed and pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by Ernst & Young LLP was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

 

Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.2021.

 

A majority of all of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is required for its approval. Proxies solicited by our board of directors will be voted FOR this proposal, unless otherwise instructed. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote on this proposal, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

 

 -10--15- 

 

PROPOSAL 3

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ApprovAL, on an advisory basis, OF the
compensation of the Company’s named executive officers

 

As required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote on the resolution to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with SEC rules in this Proxy Statement. This proposal is commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal. The compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement includes the disclosures under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosure in this Proxy Statement, as required by SEC rules.

 

In considering their vote, stockholders may wish to carefully review the information presented on our compensation policies and decisions regarding our named executive officers, as disclosed in detail in this Proxy Statement under “Executive Compensation.” Our board of directors believes that our long-term success depends in large measure on the talents of our management team and other employees and, as described below under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” we, through our executive compensation programs, seek to attract, motivate and retain top-quality senior executives who are committed to our core values of excellence and integrity. The fundamental philosophy of the Compensation Committee of our board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) is to closely align these compensation programs with the achievement of clear annual and long-term performance goals tied to our financial success and the creation of stockholder value. The Compensation Committee believes that it is important to create a compensation program that appropriately balances short-term, equity-based or cash-based compensation with long-term, equity-based compensation.

 

Our board of directors has determined that the best way to allow stockholders to vote on the compensation of our named executive officers is through the following resolution:

 

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company advise that they approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Company’s 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including the disclosure under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosure in the Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with SEC rules in this Proxy Statement. Although this vote is advisory and non-binding, our board of directors and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding compensation of our named executive officers.

 

Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR the approval,resolution to approve, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with SEC rules in this Proxy Statement, including the disclosure under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosure in this Proxy Statement.

 

A majority of all of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is required for its approval. Proxies solicited by our board of directors will be voted FOR this proposal, unless otherwise instructed. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote on this proposal, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

 

 -11--16- 

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEE MATTERS

 

Board of Directors

 

Our board of directors is responsible for overseeing our affairs. Our board of directors conducts its business through meetings and actions taken by written consent in lieu of meetings. The policy of our board of directors, as set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), is to encourage and promote the attendance by each director at all scheduled meetings of our board of directors and all meetings of our stockholders. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, our board of directors held fiveeight meetings. AllDuring the year ended December 31, 2020, all of our directors during the term of their tenure attended at least 75%90% of the meetings of our board of directors in 2017, including meetings of the committees of our board of directors of which they were members. In 2017,2020, all of the eight directors then serving on our board of directors attended our 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

CommitteesCode of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Conduct was designed to assist directors, officers and employees in complying with the law, and in resolving moral and ethical issues that may arise in complying with our policies and procedures. Some areas addressed by the Code of Conduct include: conflicts of interest; confidentiality; internal accounting controls, fair dealing, discrimination and harassment; and health and safety. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is more fully described below under “Corporate Governance—Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.”

Cybersecurity

With increasing risks and a constantly changing cyber environment, we ensure we have a well-formulated architecture for protection and maintenance of our information technology (“IT”) resources – to safeguard the operations of our business as well as the safety and privacy of our employees and our tenants. Critical components we employ to safeguard our IT environment include: perimeter and physical security, email and web filtering services, endpoint protection, access controls, backups and data redundancy, multifactor authentication on critical systems, and formal training programs for our employees concerning IT security. Our management team reports quarterly, or more frequently if necessary, to our board of directors regarding IT security matters. In addition, the Compensation Committee determined that cybersecurity assessment management would comprise a portion of the annual incentive bonus plan for Messrs. Haines and Schoebel for the year ended December 31, 2020. For a detailed description of our executive compensation program, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

-7-

Policy Against Money Laundering

We are committed to minimizing the risk of our operations being used by money launderers and to preventing any financing of terrorism. We comply with all applicable anti-money laundering laws and we will not knowingly do business with anyone who we suspect of being connected with criminal or terrorist activity or who is subject to applicable trade sanctions. ROIC’s employees, officers and directors are required to immediately report any suspicious activities to our Compliance Officer.

Environmental Stewardship and Risk Management

We recognize the environmental impact of our operations as a diverse portfolio of necessity-based retail properties. We are committed to developing a process to track and review our environmental impact from landlord-controlled common areas and, to the extent feasible, encouraging tenants to reduce their environmental footprints and to operate sustainably. In 2019, we received IREM® Certified Sustainable Property certification at the Fallbrook Shopping Center, our largest asset, demonstrating our continued sustainability performance in energy, water, health, purchasing and management.

·Energy management: Energy management measures that have been implemented and/or are planned include LED lighting upgrades in common areas and the solicitation of bids to install on-site renewable energy (solar with battery storage where feasible) at selected properties.

·Electric vehicle (“EV”) charging stations: We currently have 14 EV charging stations at four properties and we are working toward adding more EV charging stations with a number of anchor tenants that have lease rights to parking spaces. We plan to add additional charging stations at multiple properties in 2021.

·Waste management: We encourage our employees and third-party contractors to engage in sound waste management practices, covering issues such as hazardous and non-hazardous waste generation, reuse, recycling, composting, recovery, incineration, landfill, and on-site storage that complies with local laws and codes.

·Water management: Approximately 41% of our portfolio (by floor area) is located in regions with extremely high or high baseline water stress, and therefore we are committed to implementing water stewardship best practices across our portfolio. We plan to have at least 80% of our portfolio’s water usage managed by irrigation systems that minimize water use. At properties where we have completed water upgrade efforts so far, we have seen our water usage decrease by approximately 15%.

·Biodiversity and habitat: We aim to minimize any potential impact our operations may have on wildlife, endangered species, ecosystems services, and habitat management through implementing strategies directly or through third-party contractors. Some strategies include managing snow and ice in ways that limit degradation of water quality, maintaining vegetative cover to prevent erosion, and reducing fertilizer use to only as needed for plant health applications based on soil testing.

·Indoor and outdoor environmental quality: We strive to maintain healthy indoor and outdoor environments at the properties we own and operate by, among others, preventative maintenance, green cleaning, and no smoking policies.

·Procurement and sourcing: We consider adopting sustainable procurement and material sourcing practices for common areas, on a property-by-property basis for existing, as well as, new construction and major renovation projects.

·Data tracking of metrics: We benchmark and track our greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions for common areas using all attainable utility data for energy consumption or management of energy from renewable and non-renewable sources.

-8-

·Resilience to catastrophes and disasters: We have a comprehensive Disaster Recovery/Business Resumption Plan in place that includes how to respond to extreme weather events such as earthquakes, floods, fires, and pandemics. Less than 3% of our portfolio is located in 100-year flood zones.

·Acquisitions: We include several ESG considerations in our property acquisition criteria. Some topics covered in our information request include: building safety; energy efficiency; GHG emissions; water supply and efficiency; access to public transportation; and compliance with regulatory requirements.

Environmental Targets

In 2020, we set measurable and time-bound reduction targets for common area energy, water, waste, and GHG emissions. We will continue to report our progress against these targets in future communications.

Social Responsibility

Supporting our employees, our tenants, and our communities is at the heart of our business model. Our properties provide essential services and places to gather people in meaningful ways and we strive to impact all of our stakeholders positively through engagement and feedback.

·Diversity and inclusion: We value and advance a diverse and inclusive workplace and believe that our success is dependent upon the diverse backgrounds and perspectives of our employees and directors. We strive to create equal opportunities for all current and future employees and to build a culture that is collaborative, diverse, supportive and inclusive. We are proud that approximately 70% of our workforce comprises women. Furthermore, our long-term incentive plan’s ESG metrics include holding diversity and inclusion training for employees annually.

·Employee training and development: We support the continual development of our employees by providing educational and training opportunities, including accounting and continuing education classes, professional certifications, software training, and industry workshops and seminars, to help advance their personal and professional growth and skills, and to build our internal capacity for growth and development.

·Equal opportunity workplace: We are committed to equal opportunity and we work to maintain workplaces that are free from discrimination or harassment on the basis of race, color, religion, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or expression, national origin, age, disability, military or veteran status, genetic information, or other statuses or characteristics protected by law.

·Anti-retaliation: Employees are encouraged to report any acts of discrimination or harassment to the Chief Executive Officer, Compliance Officer, or any member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board. Employees may report confidentially to the Compliance Officer by email at auditcommitteehotline@roireit.net. Any kind of retaliation against employees for raising these issues is strictly prohibited and will not be tolerated.

·Human Rights Policy: We aim to conduct operations that are consistent with the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. We do not tolerate the use of any form of child labor, forced or compulsory labor, and/or violations of labor standards and working conditions and human rights. Our Human Rights Policy covers topics such as: workplace security; forced labor and human trafficking; work hours, wages, and benefits; freedom of association and collective bargaining; and employee training and reporting. Further detail on our Human Rights Policy is available on our website www.roireit.net.

·Tenant engagement: We undertake several tenant engagement initiatives across our properties that aim to improve the satisfaction and retention rate of our tenants.

-9-

·Employee wellness and benefits: The physical and mental health and wellness of our employees is paramount. We provide employees with competitive compensation, including cash bonuses and equity awards and a wide range of benefits including comprehensive medical and dental insurance coverage, short and long term disability benefits, a 401(k) retirement program and matching, paid maternity, paternity and adoptive leave and vacation, sick and personal leave, flexible work arrangements, flexible savings accounts, and other benefits.

·Community engagement: Our properties provide essential services to the communities in which they are located and we understand that they play an important role in making these communities better places to live and work. We are committed to making a positive impact in the communities in which our properties are located and engage in community activities such as hosting and/or sponsoring free or not-for-profit led community events at our properties throughout the year.

COVID-19

As an owner and operator of shopping centers with essential services, during the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been committed to serving the needs of our employees, tenants, and their customers and we have focused on their as well as our health and business continuity. Some of the actions we have taken since March 2020 include:

·Safety: Established new safety protocols and procedures at all of our properties, including increasing cleaning protocols, addressing the protection of tenants during cleaning, establishing physical distancing procedures, requiring facial coverings, providing personal protective equipment and cleaning supplies for employees who needed to be onsite, and adding an ultraviolet system to all HVAC units at our offices.

·Employees: Asked all employees to begin working from home beginning March 16th, 2020 and following health and safety stay-at-home orders per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.

·Tenants: Commenced rent deferment discussions with our tenants and assisted tenants in identifying local, state and federal resources that may be available to support their businesses and employees during the pandemic, including stimulus funds that may be available under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 or additional stimulus or relief packages implemented by local, state or federal governments. Additionally, in order to assist our tenants in remaining open and operating, we offered aid to expand outdoor operations (in accordance with state guidelines), utilizing shaded and broad sidewalk areas, existing courtyard space, and converting lawn and parking stalls into private, umbrellaed spaces for tenants to operate all while procuring key items needed to create outdoor usable spaces for tenants, including umbrellas, partitions, space heaters and wind barriers.

·Operations: Successfully executed our business continuity plan with no disruption to our core financial, operational, and IT systems.

-10-

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board of Directors

 

Our board of directors has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Audit Committee.is currently comprised of nine directors: Richard A. Baker, Angela K. Ho, Michael J. Indiveri, (Chair),Edward H. Meyer, Lee S. Neibart, Charles J. Persico, Laura H. Pomerantz, Stuart A. Tanz and Eric S. Zorn areZorn. In accordance with our charter (the “Charter”) and Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), each director holds office until our next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualifies, or until the current members of the Audit Committee.  Our board of directorsdirector’s earlier resignation, death or removal.

Mr. Meyer, a long-tenured independent director, has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent as required by NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, SEC rules governing the qualifications of audit committee members, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards (as defined below) and the written charter of the Audit Committee.  Our board of directors has also determined, based upon its qualitative assessment of their relevant levels of knowledge and business experience (see “1. Election of Directors—Nominees for Election as Directors” in this Proxy Statement for a description of their respective backgrounds and experience), that Mr. Indiveri qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of, and as defined by, SEC rules and has the requisite accounting or related financial management expertise required by NASDAQ corporate governance requirements.  In addition,advised our board of directors has determined that allhe will not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting upon expiration of his current term. Mr. Meyer’s leadership, business acumen and invaluable contributions over the membersyears have been instrumental in the company’s growth and success and Mr. Meyer will continue to serve the Company as a director emeritus.

On February 23, 2021, our board of directors elected Ms. Angela K. Ho to become a new independent director effective March 1, 2021. In connection with this election, our board of directors temporarily increased the Audit Committee are financially literate as required by NASDAQ corporate governance requirements.  The Audit Committee, which met four times during 2017, among other things, acts on behalfsize of our board of directors to dischargeby one director until the Annual Meeting when Mr. Meyer does not stand for re-election. The size of our board of directors’ responsibilities relating to our and our subsidiaries’ corporate accounting and reporting practices,directors will be reduced by one director when Mr. Meyer does not stand for re-election at the quality and integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the performance, qualifications and independence of our external auditors, the performance of our internal audit function and our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.  The Audit Committee is also responsible for approving and reviewing with management and external auditors the interim and audited annual financial statements, meeting with officers responsible for certifying our annual report on Form 10-K or any quarterly report on Form 10-Q prior to any such certification and reviewing with such officers disclosures related to any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls.  The Audit Committee is charged with periodically discussing with our external auditors such auditors’ judgments about the quality, not just the acceptability, of our accounting principles as applied in our consolidated financial statements.  The specific responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its written charter, a copy of which is available for viewing on our website at www.roireit.net.Annual Meeting.

 

Compensation Committee.  Laura H. Pomerantz (Chair), Charles J. Persico and Edward H. Meyer areUpon the current members of the Compensation Committee.  Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Compensation Committee are independent as required by NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, SEC rules governing the independence of compensation committee directors, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards and the written charter of the Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee, which met four times during 2017, is responsible for, among other things, overseeing the approval, administration and evaluation of our compensation plans, policies and programs, and reviewing the compensation of our directors and our named executive officers.  The specific responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its written charter, a copy of which is available for viewing on our website at www.roireit.net.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  Edward H. Meyer (Chair), Charles J. Persico and Michael J. Indiveri are the current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  Our board of directors has determined that all of the membersrecommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent as required by NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards and the written charter of the Nominatingour board of directors (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which met one time during 2017,Committee”), with the exception of Mr. Meyer who is responsiblenot standing for among other things, reviewing and making recommendationsre-election to our board of directors, on the rangeeach of qualifications that should be represented onour current directors, Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Mses. Ho and Pomerantz, has been nominated by our board of directors to stand for election as directors by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting to serve until our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and eligibility criteria for individualuntil their respective successors are duly elected and qualify.

We seek to have a board membership, seeking, consideringof directors representing diverse educational backgrounds and recommendingdifferent work and life experiences that provide a range of insights into the financial, governmental or legal matters that are relevant to our business and to our status as a publicly owned company. We believe that, as a group, the nominees bring a diverse range of perspectives that contribute to the effectiveness of our board as a whole and the oversight that our board of directors qualified candidates for election as directors and approving and recommending to the full board of directors succession plans for each of our named executive officers.  It reviews and makes recommendations on matters involving the general operation of our board of directors and our corporate governance, and recommendsprovides to our board of directors nominees for each committee of our board of directors.  In addition, the Nominatingsenior management team. The procedures and Corporate Governance Committee annually facilitates the assessment of our board of directors’ performance as a whole and of the individual directors, and reports thereon to our board of directors.  The specific responsibilitiesconsiderations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in recommending qualified director candidates are set forthdescribed below under “Corporate Governance—Identification of Director Candidates” in this Proxy Statement. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our board of directors concluded that each of our director nominees should be nominated for election based on the qualifications and experience described in the biographical information below under “Nominees for Election as Directors.”

It is intended that the shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies will be voted by the persons named therein as proxy holders FOR the election of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Mses. Ho and Pomerantz as directors, unless otherwise instructed. If the candidacy of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Neibart, Persico, Tanz or Zorn, or Mses. Ho or Pomerantz should, for any reason, be withdrawn prior to the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted by the proxy holders in favor of such substituted candidates (if any) as shall be nominated by our board of directors. Our board of directors has no reason to believe that, if elected, Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Mses. Ho and Pomerantz will be unable or unwilling to serve as directors.

Nominees for Election as Directors

The following information is furnished regarding the nominees for election as directors as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Richard A. Baker, 55, the Chairman of our board of directors, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007, as Executive Chairman of our board of directors between 2009 and 2012 and as Non-Executive Chairman from 2012 until present. Mr. Baker is the Chief Governour and Executive Chairman of the Hudson’s Bay Company, a diversified North American retail organization, which owns and operates Saks, Inc., and the Hudson’s Bay Company. Since 1988, Mr. Baker has served in various capacities, including President, Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President and is now Chairman of National Realty & Development Corp., a real estate development company. National Realty & Development Corp. owns and manages a real estate portfolio which includes shopping centers and corporate business centers located in 20 states. National Realty & Development Corp.’s tenants include prominent retailers such as Walmart, Kohl’s, Lowe’s, The Home Depot, Sears, Staples, Supervalu and T.J. Maxx. Mr. Baker received a B.S. in Hotel Administration from Cornell University and serves on the Dean’s Advisory Board of the hotel and real estate program and as a Trustee of the university. We believe Mr. Baker’s significant prior experience as a founder, an executive officer and a director of numerous real estate companies makes him qualified to serve as a director.

-11-

Angela K. Ho, 37, has served as one of our directors since March 2021. Ms. Ho has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of OceanFirst Bank since 2016. From 2012 to 2016, she served as Vice President and Controller at Northfield Bank and from 2010 to 2012 she served as Accounting Policy Manager at Signature Bank. Prior to that she worked at KPMG in the New York Financial Services Practice from 2006 to 2010. Ms. Ho is a New York Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Global Management Accountant. She is an active member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and currently serves on the AICPA Governing Council. Ms. Ho has been awarded American Banker’s 2020 Most Powerful Women in Banking: Next List, Asian American Business Development Center’s 2018 Outstanding 50 Asian Americans in Business, and New Jersey Bankers Association’s 2015 New Leaders in Banking. Ms. Ho received a B.S. in Accounting from University of Massachusetts Amherst and an M.B.A. from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. The Company believes that Ms. Ho’s extensive experience in the banking and accounting industries makes her qualified to serve as a director.

Michael J. Indiveri, 68, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007. He is a principal of Michael J. Indiveri, CPA LLC, a licensed certified public accounting firm that provides senior level accounting services to public and private financial institutions. From June 2011 to December 2011, Mr. Indiveri provided these financial and accounting consulting services through The Indiveri Group, LLC, a real estate investment firm, where he has served as President since 2007. He was an Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hudson Valley Holding Corp. (NYSE: HVB) and its written charter,principal subsidiary Hudson Valley Bank from May 2013 to June 2015. From 2007 to 2011, Mr. Indiveri served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Amalgamated Bank in New York. From 1997 until 2007, Mr. Indiveri served as the Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of City & Suburban Federal Savings Bank, where he was also a copydirector. From 1994 to 1997, Mr. Indiveri served as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of whichNew York Federal Savings Bank. Mr. Indiveri received a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and an M.B.A. from Fordham University. We believe Mr. Indiveri’s experience at Hudson Valley Holding Corp. and his prior experience at Amalgamated Bank in New York, including as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Investment Committee and Chairman of the Asset Liability Management Committee, makes him qualified to serve as a director.

Lee S. Neibart, 70, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007 and, until 2009, served as our President. Mr. Neibart is availablea founder of NRDC Real Estate Advisors, LLC and NRDC Equity Partners LLC. Mr. Neibart has been the Chief Executive Officer of HBS Global Properties, Inc. since 2013. Mr. Neibart has also been the Chairman and a Senior Partner of Trinity Investments since September 2016. From 2013 until June 2018, he was a Senior Partner and the Chairman of the Real Estate Group of Ares Management LLC. From 1993 until July 2013, Mr. Neibart was the Global Chief Executive Officer of AREA Property Partners, formerly Apollo Real Estate Advisors. From 1979 to 1993, Mr. Neibart worked at the Robert Martin Company, a real estate development and management firm, most recently as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Neibart is a director of Hudson’s Bay Company. Mr. Neibart serves on the Advisory Board of The Real Estate Institute of New York University. He is a past President of the New York Chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Parks. Mr. Neibart received a B.A. from the University of Wisconsin and an M.B.A. from the New York University School of Business. We believe Mr. Neibart’s significant prior experience as a founder, an executive officer and a director of numerous real estate companies makes him qualified to serve as a director.

Charles J. Persico, 81, has served as one of our directors since 2009. Mr. Persico is currently the President of Perbar Corp. and was previously the President of Perbar Sales Corp. and has been actively involved in various phases of the real estate industry, including development, construction and management, for viewingover 46 years. He has participated in the development, ownership and management of over 2,500 apartment units in the New York metropolitan area as well as over one million square feet of retail and commercial developments. His present portfolio consists of mainly retail developments. He has managed properties for Metropolitan Life, Aetna Insurance Company, Connecticut Mutual Insurance, Roosevelt Savings Bank and Peoples Westchester Savings Bank. Mr. Persico was a member of the Westchester County and New York State Board of Realtors and of local, state and national builders organizations. He was formerly on our website at www.roireit.netthe Board of Directors of the following organizations: City & Suburban Federal Savings Bank for over ten years serving on the Mortgage Committee, Audit and Finance Committee and also the Planning and Development Committee, Westchester County Association (a business development organization represented by such companies as IBM, PepsiCo, Chase Bank and many other large publicly traded corporations) and Westchester Business Partnership. He was also a member of the B.P.O. Elks, Scarsdale Chapter, a prior president and chairman of the Builders Institute of Westchester and Putnam Counties (a 2,400 member organization), a New York State Commissioner of the Hudson River Valley Commission, founder and first President of the Exchange Club of the Town of Greenburgh, past member of the board of trustees of Elizabeth Seton College and of the Advisory Board of Iona College; Westchester County Commission Christopher Columbus Quincentennial, Board Member of the American Lyme Disease Foundation, and the Real Estate Tax Review Board of the Town of Greenburgh, New York (60,000 population). Mr. Persico received a B.S. in Real Estate from New York University. We believe Mr. Persico’s significant prior experience as President of Perbar Sales Corp. and active involvement in various phases of the real estate industry makes him qualified to serve as a director.

 

 -12- 

 

We will provideLaura H. Pomerantz, 73, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007. In 2014, Ms. Pomerantz was appointed Vice Chairman and Head of Strategic Accounts at Cushman & Wakefield. Ms. Pomerantz is a Principal and founding partner of Laura Pomerantz Real Estate, LLC, founded in April of 2013, and has been an executive in the written chartersReal Estate industry for over 26 years. She was a Founding Partner and Principal at PBS Gould Venture, LLC, d/b/a PBS Real Estate, LLC (“PBS Real Estate”), a boutique firm offering commercial real estate advisory solutions to both tenants and landlords. Prior to joining PBS Real Estate in 2001, Ms. Pomerantz was a Senior Managing Director at Newmark & Company Real Estate. Prior to joining Newmark & Company Real Estate in 1996, Ms. Pomerantz was Executive Managing Director of S.L. Green (NYSE: SLG) and prior to that she was the Executive Vice President of The Leslie Fay Companies, Inc., having responsibility for supervising several of its upscale fashion divisions. She was with The Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. for over 18 years and served on the its Board of Directors. She is a director at the Richard Tucker Foundation and G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (NASDAQ: GIII) and is a former director as well as a former member of the Audit Committee,Nomination & Governance and Compensation Committee and/or NominatingCommittees of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (NYSE: CLI). Ms. Pomerantz received an A.B.A. in Business Administration from Miami Dade Community College. We believe Ms. Pomerantz’s significant prior experience as a Principal at PBS Real Estate and Corporate Governance Committee, freeat other real estate and retail companies makes her qualified to serve as a director.

Stuart A. Tanz, 62, has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and one of charge,our directors since 2009. Mr. Tanz was the Chief Executive Officer of United Income Properties, Inc. from 2006 to stockholders who request them.  Requests should be directed2009 and its Chief Operating Officer and President from 1988 to Michael B. Haines, our1992. United Income Properties, Inc. was a privately owned retail real estate development company in Southern California which developed, owned and operated various shopping centers in Southern California and now owns, manages and operates approximately 1,150 self-storage units and an apartment property. From 1997 to 2006, Mr. Tanz was the Chairman, Chief FinancialExecutive Officer atand President of Pan Pacific Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.Properties, Inc., 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92130.  The written chartersduring which period its total market capitalization increased by 795% from $447 million to over $4 billion. Mr. Tanz oversaw and administered all aspects of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc.’s business, management, finance and personnel and led its $146 million initial public offering on the NYSE and ultimately in the sale of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and/or Nominatingcompany for $4.1 billion to Kimco Realty Corp. (NYSE: KIM) in November 2006. From 1992 to December 1996, Mr. Tanz was a director of Revenue Properties Company Limited and Corporate Governance Committee are also availablewas the Co-Chief Executive Officer from May 1996 to August 1997. Revenue Properties Company Limited was a publicly traded company on the Toronto Stock Exchange that was the parent company of Pan Pacific Development Corp., where Mr. Tanz was the President and Chief Operating Officer from 1992 to 1997. From 1982 to 1988, Mr. Tanz was the Director of Acquisitions of Southern California at Bramalea Limited, based in Toronto, Canada, and Bramalea California Inc. Mr. Tanz is a member of the Advisory Council for viewing on our website at www.roireit.net.the University of Southern California Lusk Center for Real Estate and Chairman of the Advisory council for the Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mr. Tanz is a member of International Council of Shopping Centers and Young Presidents Organization. In 1998, National Real Estate Investors named Mr. Tanz as one of the country’s top real estate executives under the age of 40 and in 2001 Mr. Tanz was awarded San Diego’s Ernst & Young Real Estate Entrepreneur of the Year in real estate. Mr. Tanz received a B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Southern California, Marshall School of Business. We believe Mr. Tanz’s significant prior public company experience as the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. makes him qualified to serve as a director.

 

Audit Committee Report

The Audit CommitteeEric S. Zorn, 72, has furnishedserved as one of our directors since March, 2012. Mr. Zorn is currently Chairman of ESZ LLC, which is an International Real Estate Consulting Firm. It performs work for clients around the following report for the 2017 fiscal year.

The Audit Committee isglobe. From 2012 to 2015, Mr. Zorn served as a consultant to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and was engaged in Walmart’s Asian growth strategy. Until retiring in 2012, Mr. Zorn had served as President of Walmart Realty since 2002 and as an Executive Vice President of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. since 2005. He led teams responsible for monitoringnew store growth, store remodeling and property management, merchandise planning, procurement and allocation of capital among markets targeted for growth. Over a 15-year period, Mr. Zorn oversaw the integrityopening of our consolidated financial statements, our system of internal controls, our risk management, the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, and our compliance with related legal and regulatory requirements.  The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to select, determine the compensation of, evaluate and, when appropriate, replace our independent registered public accounting firm.  The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our board of directors.

Management is primarily responsible for our financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls, for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally acceptedmore than 3,200 Walmart stores in the United States, and also oversaw the strategy for disposition of excess real estate. Mr. Zorn joined Walmart in 1993 as Regional Vice President of Operations, becoming a Senior Vice President of Walmart Realty in 1995, after spending 22 years at the report on our internal control over financial reporting.  Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, was responsible for performing an independent audit of (i) our annual consolidated financial statementsJamesway Corporation, including nine years as Senior Vice President and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and (ii) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and expressing an opinion with respect thereto.  The Audit Committee’s responsibilityChief Administrative Officer. Mr. Zorn is to oversee and review the financial reporting process and to review and discuss management’s report on our internal control over financial reporting.  The Audit Committee is not, however, professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing and does not provide any expert or other special assurance as to such financial statements concerning compliance with laws, regulations or accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or as to auditor independence.  The Audit Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to it and on the representations made by our management and our independent registered public accounting firm.

The AuditExecutive Committee held four meetings during 2017.  The meetings were designed, among other things, to facilitate and encourage communication among the Audit Committee, management and Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed our ongoing compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley ActBoard of 2002,Visitors for MD Anderson Cancer Center. Mr. Zorn previously served as Trustee of the International Council of Shopping Centers, and has served several other organizations in various capacities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard No. 5 regarding the auditFoundation Board of internal control over financial reporting.  The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the overall scope and plansTrustees for its audit.  The Audit Committee reviewed reports and memoranda prepared by Ernst & Young LLP with respect to its audit of our internal control over financial reporting.  The Audit Committee met with Ernst & Young LLP, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations and their evaluations of our internal controls.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,Mercy Hospital in Rogers, Arkansas, Professional Women in Construction (New York chapter) and the related report prepared by Ernst & Young LLP, withSusan G. Komen Foundation (NWA Chapter). Mr. Zorn studied history at Fairleigh Dickinson University. We believe that Mr. Zorn’s extensive experience, including leadership of real estate acquisitions and property management and Ernst & Young LLP.  The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP management’s annual report on our internal control over financial reporting.  The Audit Committee discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP the process usedfor Walmart Realty, makes him qualified to support certifications by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that are required by the SEC and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to accompany our periodic filings with the SEC and the processes used to support management’s annual report on our internal control over financial reporting.  Asserve as a result of these discussions, the Audit Committee believes that we maintain an effective system of accounting controls that allows us to prepare consolidated financial statements that fairly present our financial position and results of our operations.  Management represented to the Audit Committee that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.director.

 

 -13- 

 

The Audit Committee reviewsOur board of directors recommends a vote FOR the election of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Meyer, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and discusses with Ernst & Young LLP their audit plan for us.  The Audit Committee also discusses with Ernst & Young LLP matters that independent accounting firms must discuss with audit committees under generally accepted auditing standardsZorn, and standardsMses. Ho and Pomerantz as directors.

A plurality of all of the PCAOB, including, among other things, matters relatedvotes cast in the election of directors at the Annual Meeting is necessary to elect a director. Proxies solicited by our board of directors will be voted FOR the conductelection of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Mses. Ho and Pomerantz, unless otherwise instructed. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the auditvote on this proposal, although they will be considered present for the purpose of our consolidated financial statements anddetermining the matterspresence of a quorum.

We have a majority voting policy for the election of directors. In an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election is required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 1301 (Communication with Audit Committees), which includestender his or her resignation to our board of directors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is required to promptly consider the resignation and make a discussion of Ernst & Young LLP’s judgments about the quality (not just the acceptability) of our accounting principles as applied to financial reporting.

The Audit Committee also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from us.  Ernst & Young LLP provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence and represented that it is independent from us.  When considering the independence of Ernst & Young LLP, the Audit Committee considered if services they provided to us, beyond those rendered in connection with their audit of our consolidated financial statements, their reviews of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and their audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, were compatible with maintaining their independence.  The Audit Committee also reviewed and approved, among other things, the tax and other professional services performed by, and the amount of fees paid for such services to, Ernst & Young LLP.  The Audit Committee also received regular updates on the amount of fees and scope of audit, tax and other professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP.

Based on the Audit Committee’s review and these meetings, discussions and reports, and subject to the limitations on the Audit Committee’s role and responsibilities referred to above and in its written charter, the Audit Committee recommendedrecommendation to our board of directors thatwith respect to the tendered resignation. Our board of directors is required to take action with respect to this recommendation. Any director who tenders his or her resignation to our audited consolidated financial statementsboard of directors will not participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration or action by our board of directors regarding whether to accept such tendered resignation. The policy is more fully described below under “Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Guidelines—Majority Voting Policy.”

In accordance with our Charter and Bylaws, vacancies occurring on our board of directors, as a result of death, resignation, removal of a director, an increase in the authorized number of directors or otherwise, may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy shall serve for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 be includedremainder of the full term of the directorship in our annual report on Form 10-K filed withwhich the SEC.  The Audit Committee has also recommended the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018vacancy occurred and until a successor is presenting this selection to our stockholders for ratification.elected and qualifies.

 

Michael J. Indiveri, Chair

Lee S. Neibart

Eric S. ZornThere are no family relationships, as defined under Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regulations, among any of our directors or executive officers.

 

The foregoing Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, to be (i) “soliciting material” or “filed” or (ii) incorporated by reference by any general statement into any filing made by us with the SEC, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such report by reference.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -14- 

 

COMPENSATIONPROPOSAL 2

RATIFICATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORSAPPOINTMENT OF the company’s
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

ForOur board of directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. Our board of directors is requesting that our stockholders ratify this appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.

The report of Ernst & Young LLP on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, each non-employee member2020 and December 31, 2019 did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

Neither our Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of our board of directors was entitled to receive compensation for his or her servicesdirectors’ appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as a director as follows: (i) an annual cash retainer of $60,000 per year in cash; (ii) an annual equity award of $100,000 in value of restricted shares of Common Stock (“Restricted Shares”); (iii) a fee of $1,500 for each meeting ofour independent registered public accounting firm. However, our board of directors attended in person or by teleconference; (iv)is submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a feematter of $1,500 for each meetinggood corporate practice. In the event that ratification of a committeethis appointment of independent registered public accounting firm is not approved at the Annual Meeting, our board of directors attended in person or by teleconference; and (v) annual chair feeswill review its future appointment of $20,000 per year, $15,000 per year and $12,500 per year to each non-employee director acting asour independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the Chair of the Audit Committee, Chair of the Compensation Committee and Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, respectively.

During 2017, the Compensation Committee engaged FTI Consulting Inc. (“FTI”) to serve as its compensation consultant in reviewing and evaluating our officer and director compensation levels and program, with the goal of creating a fair, reasonable and balanced compensation program that closely aligns the interest ofappointment is ratified, our board of directors, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests.

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be provided with those of ouran opportunity to make a statement if so desired and to respond to appropriate inquiries from stockholders.  FTI received instructions from, and reported to, the Compensation Committee on an independent basis.  FTI’s services to the Compensation Committee are discussed further below.  See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”  Other than as described herein, FTI did not provide other services to us or any of our affiliates during 2017.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

 

The following table summarizes the annual compensation receivedaggregate fees (including related expenses) billed to us for professional services provided by our non-employee directorsErnst & Young LLP for the yearfiscal years ended December 31, 2017.2020 and 2019.

 

2017 Director Compensation
Name 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1)

 

Stock Awards ($)(2)

 Total ($)
Michael J. Indiveri  95,000   99,978   194,978 
Edward H. Meyer  87,500   99,978   187,478 
Lee S. Neibart  70,500   99,978   170,478 
Charles J. Persico  75,000   99,978   174,978 
Laura H. Pomerantz  88,500   99,978   188,478 
Eric S. Zorn  73,500   99,978   173,478 
  Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
  2020(3) 2019(3)
Audit Fees(1) $772,000  $850,906 
Audit-Related Fees  —   — 
Tax Fees(2)  326,400   274,930 
All Other Fees  —   — 
Total $1,098,400  $1,125,836 

________________________________________

(1)Amounts in this column represent annual retainer, board of directors meeting fees2020 and Committee meeting and Chair2019 Audit Fees include fees paid to non-employee directors for serviceErnst & Young LLP in 2017.respect of: (i) the audit of the consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K and services attendant to, or required by, statute or regulation; (ii) reviews of the interim consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; (iii) consents and other services related to SEC and other regulatory filings and communications; and (iv) accounting consultation attendant to the audit.

 

(2)Amounts2020 and 2019 Tax Fees include tax compliance, tax planning, tax advisory and related tax services provided by Ernst & Young LLP.

(3)Does not include fees relating to the audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting of $122,450 and $126,931 paid to Berdon LLP in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of such awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). The grant date fair values of awards have been determined based on the assumptions and methodologies set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for the yearfiscal years ended December 31, 2017 (Note 8, Stock Compensation2020 and Other Benefit Plans for ROIC).2019, respectively.

 

Non-employee directors are also eligible to receive grantsThe charter of stock options (“Options”), Restricted Shares, phantom shares, dividend equivalents or other equity-based grants under the Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2009 Equity Incentive Plan”).  Directors who are also our employees are not entitled to receive additional compensation for serving onAudit Committee of our board of directors.directors (the “Audit Committee”) provides that the Audit Committee shall review and pre-approve the engagement fees and the terms of all auditing and non-auditing services to be provided by our external auditors which audit our financial statements and evaluate the effect thereof on the independence of such external auditors. All audit, tax and other services provided to us by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, were reviewed and pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by Ernst & Young LLP was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

 

AsOur board of directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the Record Date, underappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, there were outstanding Options to acquire a totalfiscal year ending December 31, 2021.

A majority of 278,500 shares of Common Stock at a weighted average purchase price of $10.79 per share, and a total of 660,098 Restricted Shares still subject to forfeiture.  During 2017, no Options were exercised and no outstanding Options for any of our named executive officers were repriced.  Asall of the Record Date, 950,179 sharesvotes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting is required for its approval. Proxies solicited by our board of Common Stock remained availabledirectors will be voted FOR this proposal, unless otherwise instructed. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote on this proposal, although they will be considered present for grant to eligible participants under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.

purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

 

 -15- 

 

INFORMATION REGARDING OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERSPROPOSAL 3

ApprovAL, on an advisory basis, OF the
compensation of the Company’s named executive officers

 

As required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote on the resolution to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with SEC rules in this Proxy Statement. This proposal is commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal. The compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement includes the disclosures under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosure in this Proxy Statement, as required by SEC rules.

In considering their vote, stockholders may wish to carefully review the information presented on our compensation policies and decisions regarding our named executive officers, as disclosed in detail in this Proxy Statement under “Executive Compensation.” Our Presidentboard of directors believes that our long-term success depends in large measure on the talents of our management team and Chief Executive Officer is Stuart A. Tanz.other employees and, as described below under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” we, through our executive compensation programs, seek to attract, motivate and retain top-quality senior executives who are committed to our core values of excellence and integrity. The non-Executive Chairmanfundamental philosophy of the Compensation Committee of our board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) is Richard A. Baker.  to closely align these compensation programs with the achievement of clear annual and long-term performance goals tied to our financial success and the creation of stockholder value. The Compensation Committee believes that it is important to create a compensation program that appropriately balances short-term, equity-based or cash-based compensation with long-term, equity-based compensation.

Our Chief Financial Officerboard of directors has determined that the best way to allow stockholders to vote on the compensation of our named executive officers is Michael B. Haines.  Our Chief Operating Officer is Richard K. Schoebel.  For Messrs. Tanz’s and Baker’s biographies, please see “1. Election of Directors—Nominees for Election as Directors.”  Thethrough the following sets forthresolution:

RESOLVED, that the biographical information for Messrs. Haines and Schoebel asstockholders of the dateCompany advise that they approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including the disclosure under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosure in the Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with SEC rules in this Proxy Statement. Although this vote is advisory and non-binding, our board of directors and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding compensation of our named executive officers.

Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR the resolution to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with SEC rules in this Proxy Statement, including the disclosure under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosure in this Proxy Statement.

 

Michael B. Haines, 56, has served as our Chief Financial Officer since December 2012.  Prior to December 2012, Mr. Haines served as Chief Accounting Officer at Pacific Office Properties Trust, Inc., a publicly traded real estate investment trust that owns and operates institutional quality office properties in Hawaii and Southern California.  From September 2009 until joining Pacific Office Properties Trust, Inc. in October 2010, Mr. Haines was Chief Accounting Officer at American Realty Advisors, an SEC-registered investment advisor and providerA majority of real estate investment management services to institutional investors.  From January 2007 to September 2008, he was Chief Financial Officer at Hopkins Real Estate Group, a firm that specializes in retail shopping center development and re-development.  Prior to January 2007, for approximately 12 years, he held various financial and accounting positions, including Vice President, Finance, at Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc., a real estate investment trust that specialized in the acquisition, ownership and management of community and neighborhood shopping centers for everyday essentials.  Prior to joining Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc., Mr. Haines was Director of Internal Audit for The Hahn Company, a developer and owner of regional shopping malls throughout the United States, and a Senior Auditor at Deloitte & Touche, LLP.  Mr. Haines received a Bachelors in Business Administration from San Diego State University.  Mr. Haines is a California-licensed Certified Public Accountant and is a memberall of the American Institutevotes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting is required for its approval. Proxies solicited by our board of Certified Public Accountantsdirectors will be voted FOR this proposal, unless otherwise instructed. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the California Societyresult of Certified Public Accountants.

Richard K. Schoebel, 52, has served as our Chief Operating Officer since 2009.  Prior to 2009, Mr. Schoebel served as the Vice President, Property Managementvote on this proposal, although they will be considered present for the West Regionpurpose of Centro Properties Group (US).  In this role, he was responsible for 8.9 million square feetdetermining the presence of community and neighborhood shopping centers.  From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Schoebel was a Principal and Managing Member of Pacific Spectrum Properties, LLC, a brokerage firm providing leasing, management and consulting services to shopping center owners.  Prior to that, for 12 years he held numerous positions at Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc., ultimately serving as Vice President, Operations, where he directed the leasing and property management for a portfolio of 38 shopping centers, encompassing five million leasable square feet.  Mr. Schoebel has over 23 years of real estate industry experience, specializing in shopping centers.  Mr. Schoebel received a B.S. in Management with a minor in Applied Computer Science from Keene State College in New Hampshire.

quorum.

 

 -16- 

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEBOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEE MATTERS

 

Role and Leadership Structure of our Board of Directors and Risk Oversight

 

Pursuant to our Charter, Bylaws and the Maryland General Corporation Law, our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors.  Our board of directors has the responsibilityis responsible for establishing broad corporate policiesoverseeing our affairs. Our board of directors conducts its business through meetings and for our overall performance and direction, but is not involvedactions taken by written consent in our day-to-day operations.  Memberslieu of meetings. The policy of our board of directors, keep informed ofas set forth in our businessCorporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), is to encourage and promote the attendance by participating ineach director at all scheduled meetings of our board of directors and its committees, by reviewing analyses, reports and other materials provided to them and through discussions withall meetings of our stockholders. During the Chairmanyear ended December 31, 2020, our board of directors held eight meetings. During the year ended December 31, 2020, all of our directors attended at least 90% of the meetings of our board of directors President and Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers.

We maintain separate roles for our Chief Executive Officer and Chairmanincluding meetings of our board of directors.

Our board of directors believes that the compositioncommittees of our board of directors protects stockholder interests and provides sufficient independent oversight of our management.  A majority of our currentwhich they were members. In 2020, all directors are “independent” under NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, as more fully described under “—Director Independence.”  The independent directors meet separately from our managementthen serving on a regular basis at the conclusion of our board of directors’ regularly scheduled meetings.  The independent directors oversee such critical matters as the integrity of our financial statements, the evaluation and compensation of our directors and executive officers and the selection and evaluation of directors.

Each independent director has the ability to add items to the agenda of board of directors meetings or raise subjects for discussion that are not on the agenda for that meeting.  In addition, our board of directors and each committeeattended our 2020 Annual Meeting of our board of directors has complete and open access to our executive officers.Stockholders.

 

Our board of directors believes that its majority independent composition and the roles that our independent directors perform provide effective corporate governance at the board of directors level and independent oversight of both our board of directors and our executive officers.  The current leadership model, when combined with the functioning of the independent director component of our board of directors and our overall corporate governance structure, strikes an appropriate balance between strong and consistent leadership and independent oversight of our business and affairs.

In connection with their oversight of risk to our business, our board of directors and the Audit Committee consider feedback from our executive officers concerning the risks related to our business, our operations and strategies.  Our executive officers regularly report to our board of directors on risks relating to our property acquisitions, our leverage and hedging policies, our capital availability and our internal control and procedures.  Members of our board of directors routinely meet with our executive officers, as appropriate, in connection with their consideration of matters submitted for the approval of our board of directors and the risks associated with such matters.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

 

Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Conduct was designed to assist directors, officers and employees in complying with the law, and in resolving moral and ethical issues that may arise in complying with our policies and procedures. Some areas addressed by the Code of Conduct include: conflicts of interest; confidentiality; internal accounting controls, fair dealing, discrimination and harassment; and health and safety. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is more fully described below under “Corporate Governance—Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.”

Cybersecurity

With increasing risks and a constantly changing cyber environment, we ensure we have a well-formulated architecture for protection and maintenance of our information technology (“IT”) resources – to safeguard the operations of our business as well as the safety and privacy of our employees and our tenants. Critical components we employ to safeguard our IT environment include: perimeter and physical security, email and web filtering services, endpoint protection, access controls, backups and data redundancy, multifactor authentication on critical systems, and formal training programs for our employees concerning IT security. Our management team reports quarterly, or more frequently if necessary, to our board of directors regarding IT security matters. In addition, the Compensation Committee determined that cybersecurity assessment management would comprise a portion of the annual incentive bonus plan for Messrs. Haines and Schoebel for the year ended December 31, 2020. For a detailed description of our executive compensation program, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

-7-

Policy Against Money Laundering

We are committed to minimizing the risk of our operations being used by money launderers and to preventing any financing of terrorism. We comply with all applicable anti-money laundering laws and we will not knowingly do business with anyone who we suspect of being connected with criminal or terrorist activity or who is subject to applicable trade sanctions. ROIC’s employees, officers and directors are required to immediately report any suspicious activities to our Compliance Officer.

Environmental Stewardship and Risk Management

We recognize the environmental impact of our operations as a diverse portfolio of necessity-based retail properties. We are committed to developing a process to track and review our environmental impact from landlord-controlled common areas and, to the extent feasible, encouraging tenants to reduce their environmental footprints and to operate sustainably. In 2019, we received IREM® Certified Sustainable Property certification at the Fallbrook Shopping Center, our largest asset, demonstrating our continued sustainability performance in energy, water, health, purchasing and management.

·Energy management: Energy management measures that have been implemented and/or are planned include LED lighting upgrades in common areas and the solicitation of bids to install on-site renewable energy (solar with battery storage where feasible) at selected properties.

·Electric vehicle (“EV”) charging stations: We currently have 14 EV charging stations at four properties and we are working toward adding more EV charging stations with a number of anchor tenants that have lease rights to parking spaces. We plan to add additional charging stations at multiple properties in 2021.

·Waste management: We encourage our employees and third-party contractors to engage in sound waste management practices, covering issues such as hazardous and non-hazardous waste generation, reuse, recycling, composting, recovery, incineration, landfill, and on-site storage that complies with local laws and codes.

·Water management: Approximately 41% of our portfolio (by floor area) is located in regions with extremely high or high baseline water stress, and therefore we are committed to implementing water stewardship best practices across our portfolio. We plan to have at least 80% of our portfolio’s water usage managed by irrigation systems that minimize water use. At properties where we have completed water upgrade efforts so far, we have seen our water usage decrease by approximately 15%.

·Biodiversity and habitat: We aim to minimize any potential impact our operations may have on wildlife, endangered species, ecosystems services, and habitat management through implementing strategies directly or through third-party contractors. Some strategies include managing snow and ice in ways that limit degradation of water quality, maintaining vegetative cover to prevent erosion, and reducing fertilizer use to only as needed for plant health applications based on soil testing.

·Indoor and outdoor environmental quality: We strive to maintain healthy indoor and outdoor environments at the properties we own and operate by, among others, preventative maintenance, green cleaning, and no smoking policies.

·Procurement and sourcing: We consider adopting sustainable procurement and material sourcing practices for common areas, on a property-by-property basis for existing, as well as, new construction and major renovation projects.

·Data tracking of metrics: We benchmark and track our greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions for common areas using all attainable utility data for energy consumption or management of energy from renewable and non-renewable sources.

-8-

·Resilience to catastrophes and disasters: We have a comprehensive Disaster Recovery/Business Resumption Plan in place that includes how to respond to extreme weather events such as earthquakes, floods, fires, and pandemics. Less than 3% of our portfolio is located in 100-year flood zones.

·Acquisitions: We include several ESG considerations in our property acquisition criteria. Some topics covered in our information request include: building safety; energy efficiency; GHG emissions; water supply and efficiency; access to public transportation; and compliance with regulatory requirements.

Environmental Targets

In 2020, we set measurable and time-bound reduction targets for common area energy, water, waste, and GHG emissions. We will continue to report our progress against these targets in future communications.

Social Responsibility

Supporting our employees, our tenants, and our communities is at the heart of our business model. Our properties provide essential services and places to gather people in meaningful ways and we strive to impact all of our stakeholders positively through engagement and feedback.

·Diversity and inclusion: We value and advance a diverse and inclusive workplace and believe that our success is dependent upon the diverse backgrounds and perspectives of our employees and directors. We strive to create equal opportunities for all current and future employees and to build a culture that is collaborative, diverse, supportive and inclusive. We are proud that approximately 70% of our workforce comprises women. Furthermore, our long-term incentive plan’s ESG metrics include holding diversity and inclusion training for employees annually.

·Employee training and development: We support the continual development of our employees by providing educational and training opportunities, including accounting and continuing education classes, professional certifications, software training, and industry workshops and seminars, to help advance their personal and professional growth and skills, and to build our internal capacity for growth and development.

·Equal opportunity workplace: We are committed to equal opportunity and we work to maintain workplaces that are free from discrimination or harassment on the basis of race, color, religion, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or expression, national origin, age, disability, military or veteran status, genetic information, or other statuses or characteristics protected by law.

·Anti-retaliation: Employees are encouraged to report any acts of discrimination or harassment to the Chief Executive Officer, Compliance Officer, or any member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board. Employees may report confidentially to the Compliance Officer by email at auditcommitteehotline@roireit.net. Any kind of retaliation against employees for raising these issues is strictly prohibited and will not be tolerated.

·Human Rights Policy: We aim to conduct operations that are consistent with the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. We do not tolerate the use of any form of child labor, forced or compulsory labor, and/or violations of labor standards and working conditions and human rights. Our Human Rights Policy covers topics such as: workplace security; forced labor and human trafficking; work hours, wages, and benefits; freedom of association and collective bargaining; and employee training and reporting. Further detail on our Human Rights Policy is available on our website www.roireit.net.

·Tenant engagement: We undertake several tenant engagement initiatives across our properties that aim to improve the satisfaction and retention rate of our tenants.

-9-

·Employee wellness and benefits: The physical and mental health and wellness of our employees is paramount. We provide employees with competitive compensation, including cash bonuses and equity awards and a wide range of benefits including comprehensive medical and dental insurance coverage, short and long term disability benefits, a 401(k) retirement program and matching, paid maternity, paternity and adoptive leave and vacation, sick and personal leave, flexible work arrangements, flexible savings accounts, and other benefits.

·Community engagement: Our properties provide essential services to the communities in which they are located and we understand that they play an important role in making these communities better places to live and work. We are committed to making a positive impact in the communities in which our properties are located and engage in community activities such as hosting and/or sponsoring free or not-for-profit led community events at our properties throughout the year.

COVID-19

As an owner and operator of shopping centers with essential services, during the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been committed to serving the needs of our employees, tenants, and their customers and we have focused on their as well as our health and business continuity. Some of the actions we have taken since March 2020 include:

·Safety: Established new safety protocols and procedures at all of our properties, including increasing cleaning protocols, addressing the protection of tenants during cleaning, establishing physical distancing procedures, requiring facial coverings, providing personal protective equipment and cleaning supplies for employees who needed to be onsite, and adding an ultraviolet system to all HVAC units at our offices.

·Employees: Asked all employees to begin working from home beginning March 16th, 2020 and following health and safety stay-at-home orders per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.

·Tenants: Commenced rent deferment discussions with our tenants and assisted tenants in identifying local, state and federal resources that may be available to support their businesses and employees during the pandemic, including stimulus funds that may be available under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 or additional stimulus or relief packages implemented by local, state or federal governments. Additionally, in order to assist our tenants in remaining open and operating, we offered aid to expand outdoor operations (in accordance with state guidelines), utilizing shaded and broad sidewalk areas, existing courtyard space, and converting lawn and parking stalls into private, umbrellaed spaces for tenants to operate all while procuring key items needed to create outdoor usable spaces for tenants, including umbrellas, partitions, space heaters and wind barriers.

·Operations: Successfully executed our business continuity plan with no disruption to our core financial, operational, and IT systems.

-10-

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board of Directors

Our board of directors is currently comprised of nine directors: Richard A. Baker, Angela K. Ho, Michael J. Indiveri, Edward H. Meyer, Lee S. Neibart, Charles J. Persico, Laura H. Pomerantz, Stuart A. Tanz and Eric S. Zorn. In accordance with our charter (the “Charter”) and Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), each director holds office until our next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualifies, or until the director’s earlier resignation, death or removal.

Mr. Meyer, a long-tenured independent director, has advised our board of directors that he will not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting upon expiration of his current term. Mr. Meyer’s leadership, business acumen and invaluable contributions over the years have been instrumental in the company’s growth and success and Mr. Meyer will continue to serve the Company as a director emeritus.

On February 23, 2021, our board of directors elected Ms. Angela K. Ho to become a new independent director effective March 1, 2021. In connection with this election, our board of directors temporarily increased the size of our board of directors by one director until the Annual Meeting when Mr. Meyer does not stand for re-election. The size of our board of directors will be reduced by one director when Mr. Meyer does not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our board of directors (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”), with the exception of Mr. Meyer who is not standing for re-election to our board of directors, each of our current directors, Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Mses. Ho and Pomerantz, has been nominated by our board of directors to stand for election as directors by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting to serve until our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify.

We seek to have a board of directors representing diverse educational backgrounds and different work and life experiences that provide a range of insights into the financial, governmental or legal matters that are relevant to our business and to our status as a publicly owned company. We believe that, as a group, the nominees bring a diverse range of perspectives that contribute to the effectiveness of our board as a whole and the oversight that our board of directors provides to our senior management team. The procedures and considerations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in recommending qualified director candidates are described below under “Corporate Governance—Identification of Director Candidates” in this Proxy Statement. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our board of directors concluded that each of our director nominees should be nominated for election based on the qualifications and experience described in the biographical information below under “Nominees for Election as Directors.”

It is intended that the shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies will be voted by the persons named therein as proxy holders FOR the election of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Mses. Ho and Pomerantz as directors, unless otherwise instructed. If the candidacy of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Neibart, Persico, Tanz or Zorn, or Mses. Ho or Pomerantz should, for any reason, be withdrawn prior to the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted by the proxy holders in favor of such substituted candidates (if any) as shall be nominated by our board of directors. Our board of directors has no reason to believe that, if elected, Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Mses. Ho and Pomerantz will be unable or unwilling to serve as directors.

Nominees for Election as Directors

The following information is furnished regarding the nominees for election as directors as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Richard A. Baker, 55, the Chairman of our board of directors, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007, as Executive Chairman of our board of directors between 2009 and 2012 and as Non-Executive Chairman from 2012 until present. Mr. Baker is the Chief Governour and Executive Chairman of the Hudson’s Bay Company, a diversified North American retail organization, which owns and operates Saks, Inc., and the Hudson’s Bay Company. Since 1988, Mr. Baker has served in various capacities, including President, Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President and is now Chairman of National Realty & Development Corp., a real estate development company. National Realty & Development Corp. owns and manages a real estate portfolio which includes shopping centers and corporate business centers located in 20 states. National Realty & Development Corp.’s tenants include prominent retailers such as Walmart, Kohl’s, Lowe’s, The Home Depot, Sears, Staples, Supervalu and T.J. Maxx. Mr. Baker received a B.S. in Hotel Administration from Cornell University and serves on the Dean’s Advisory Board of the hotel and real estate program and as a Trustee of the university. We believe Mr. Baker’s significant prior experience as a founder, an executive officer and a director of numerous real estate companies makes him qualified to serve as a director.

-11-

Angela K. Ho, 37, has served as one of our directors since March 2021. Ms. Ho has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of OceanFirst Bank since 2016. From 2012 to 2016, she served as Vice President and Controller at Northfield Bank and from 2010 to 2012 she served as Accounting Policy Manager at Signature Bank. Prior to that she worked at KPMG in the New York Financial Services Practice from 2006 to 2010. Ms. Ho is a New York Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Global Management Accountant. She is an active member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and currently serves on the AICPA Governing Council. Ms. Ho has been awarded American Banker’s 2020 Most Powerful Women in Banking: Next List, Asian American Business Development Center’s 2018 Outstanding 50 Asian Americans in Business, and New Jersey Bankers Association’s 2015 New Leaders in Banking. Ms. Ho received a B.S. in Accounting from University of Massachusetts Amherst and an M.B.A. from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. The Company believes that Ms. Ho’s extensive experience in the banking and accounting industries makes her qualified to serve as a director.

Michael J. Indiveri, 68, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007. He is a principal of Michael J. Indiveri, CPA LLC, a licensed certified public accounting firm that provides senior level accounting services to public and private financial institutions. From June 2011 to December 2011, Mr. Indiveri provided these financial and accounting consulting services through The Indiveri Group, LLC, a real estate investment firm, where he has served as President since 2007. He was an Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hudson Valley Holding Corp. (NYSE: HVB) and its principal subsidiary Hudson Valley Bank from May 2013 to June 2015. From 2007 to 2011, Mr. Indiveri served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Amalgamated Bank in New York. From 1997 until 2007, Mr. Indiveri served as the Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of City & Suburban Federal Savings Bank, where he was also a director. From 1994 to 1997, Mr. Indiveri served as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of New York Federal Savings Bank. Mr. Indiveri received a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and an M.B.A. from Fordham University. We believe Mr. Indiveri’s experience at Hudson Valley Holding Corp. and his prior experience at Amalgamated Bank in New York, including as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Investment Committee and Chairman of the Asset Liability Management Committee, makes him qualified to serve as a director.

Lee S. Neibart, 70, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007 and, until 2009, served as our President. Mr. Neibart is a founder of NRDC Real Estate Advisors, LLC and NRDC Equity Partners LLC. Mr. Neibart has been the Chief Executive Officer of HBS Global Properties, Inc. since 2013. Mr. Neibart has also been the Chairman and a Senior Partner of Trinity Investments since September 2016. From 2013 until June 2018, he was a Senior Partner and the Chairman of the Real Estate Group of Ares Management LLC. From 1993 until July 2013, Mr. Neibart was the Global Chief Executive Officer of AREA Property Partners, formerly Apollo Real Estate Advisors. From 1979 to 1993, Mr. Neibart worked at the Robert Martin Company, a real estate development and management firm, most recently as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Neibart is a director of Hudson’s Bay Company. Mr. Neibart serves on the Advisory Board of The Real Estate Institute of New York University. He is a past President of the New York Chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Parks. Mr. Neibart received a B.A. from the University of Wisconsin and an M.B.A. from the New York University School of Business. We believe Mr. Neibart’s significant prior experience as a founder, an executive officer and a director of numerous real estate companies makes him qualified to serve as a director.

Charles J. Persico, 81, has served as one of our directors since 2009. Mr. Persico is currently the President of Perbar Corp. and was previously the President of Perbar Sales Corp. and has been actively involved in various phases of the real estate industry, including development, construction and management, for over 46 years. He has participated in the development, ownership and management of over 2,500 apartment units in the New York metropolitan area as well as over one million square feet of retail and commercial developments. His present portfolio consists of mainly retail developments. He has managed properties for Metropolitan Life, Aetna Insurance Company, Connecticut Mutual Insurance, Roosevelt Savings Bank and Peoples Westchester Savings Bank. Mr. Persico was a member of the Westchester County and New York State Board of Realtors and of local, state and national builders organizations. He was formerly on the Board of Directors of the following organizations: City & Suburban Federal Savings Bank for over ten years serving on the Mortgage Committee, Audit and Finance Committee and also the Planning and Development Committee, Westchester County Association (a business development organization represented by such companies as IBM, PepsiCo, Chase Bank and many other large publicly traded corporations) and Westchester Business Partnership. He was also a member of the B.P.O. Elks, Scarsdale Chapter, a prior president and chairman of the Builders Institute of Westchester and Putnam Counties (a 2,400 member organization), a New York State Commissioner of the Hudson River Valley Commission, founder and first President of the Exchange Club of the Town of Greenburgh, past member of the board of trustees of Elizabeth Seton College and of the Advisory Board of Iona College; Westchester County Commission Christopher Columbus Quincentennial, Board Member of the American Lyme Disease Foundation, and the Real Estate Tax Review Board of the Town of Greenburgh, New York (60,000 population). Mr. Persico received a B.S. in Real Estate from New York University. We believe Mr. Persico’s significant prior experience as President of Perbar Sales Corp. and active involvement in various phases of the real estate industry makes him qualified to serve as a director.

-12-

Laura H. Pomerantz, 73, has served as one of our directors since our inception in 2007. In 2014, Ms. Pomerantz was appointed Vice Chairman and Head of Strategic Accounts at Cushman & Wakefield. Ms. Pomerantz is a Principal and founding partner of Laura Pomerantz Real Estate, LLC, founded in April of 2013, and has been an executive in the Real Estate industry for over 26 years. She was a Founding Partner and Principal at PBS Gould Venture, LLC, d/b/a PBS Real Estate, LLC (“PBS Real Estate”), a boutique firm offering commercial real estate advisory solutions to both tenants and landlords. Prior to joining PBS Real Estate in 2001, Ms. Pomerantz was a Senior Managing Director at Newmark & Company Real Estate. Prior to joining Newmark & Company Real Estate in 1996, Ms. Pomerantz was Executive Managing Director of S.L. Green (NYSE: SLG) and prior to that she was the Executive Vice President of The Leslie Fay Companies, Inc., having responsibility for supervising several of its upscale fashion divisions. She was with The Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. for over 18 years and served on the its Board of Directors. She is a director at the Richard Tucker Foundation and G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (NASDAQ: GIII) and is a former director as well as a former member of the Nomination & Governance and Compensation Committees of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (NYSE: CLI). Ms. Pomerantz received an A.B.A. in Business Administration from Miami Dade Community College. We believe Ms. Pomerantz’s significant prior experience as a Principal at PBS Real Estate and at other real estate and retail companies makes her qualified to serve as a director.

Stuart A. Tanz, 62, has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and one of our directors since 2009. Mr. Tanz was the Chief Executive Officer of United Income Properties, Inc. from 2006 to 2009 and its Chief Operating Officer and President from 1988 to 1992. United Income Properties, Inc. was a privately owned retail real estate development company in Southern California which developed, owned and operated various shopping centers in Southern California and now owns, manages and operates approximately 1,150 self-storage units and an apartment property. From 1997 to 2006, Mr. Tanz was the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc., during which period its total market capitalization increased by 795% from $447 million to over $4 billion. Mr. Tanz oversaw and administered all aspects of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc.’s business, management, finance and personnel and led its $146 million initial public offering on the NYSE and ultimately in the sale of the company for $4.1 billion to Kimco Realty Corp. (NYSE: KIM) in November 2006. From 1992 to December 1996, Mr. Tanz was a director of Revenue Properties Company Limited and was the Co-Chief Executive Officer from May 1996 to August 1997. Revenue Properties Company Limited was a publicly traded company on the Toronto Stock Exchange that was the parent company of Pan Pacific Development Corp., where Mr. Tanz was the President and Chief Operating Officer from 1992 to 1997. From 1982 to 1988, Mr. Tanz was the Director of Acquisitions of Southern California at Bramalea Limited, based in Toronto, Canada, and Bramalea California Inc. Mr. Tanz is a member of the Advisory Council for the University of Southern California Lusk Center for Real Estate and Chairman of the Advisory council for the Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mr. Tanz is a member of International Council of Shopping Centers and Young Presidents Organization. In 1998, National Real Estate Investors named Mr. Tanz as one of the country’s top real estate executives under the age of 40 and in 2001 Mr. Tanz was awarded San Diego’s Ernst & Young Real Estate Entrepreneur of the Year in real estate. Mr. Tanz received a B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Southern California, Marshall School of Business. We believe Mr. Tanz’s significant prior public company experience as the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. makes him qualified to serve as a director.

Eric S. Zorn, 72, has served as one of our directors since March, 2012. Mr. Zorn is currently Chairman of ESZ LLC, which is an International Real Estate Consulting Firm. It performs work for clients around the globe. From 2012 to 2015, Mr. Zorn served as a consultant to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and was engaged in Walmart’s Asian growth strategy. Until retiring in 2012, Mr. Zorn had served as President of Walmart Realty since 2002 and as an Executive Vice President of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. since 2005. He led teams responsible for new store growth, store remodeling and property management, merchandise planning, procurement and allocation of capital among markets targeted for growth. Over a 15-year period, Mr. Zorn oversaw the opening of more than 3,200 Walmart stores in the United States, and also oversaw the strategy for disposition of excess real estate. Mr. Zorn joined Walmart in 1993 as Regional Vice President of Operations, becoming a Senior Vice President of Walmart Realty in 1995, after spending 22 years at the Jamesway Corporation, including nine years as Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Zorn is on the Executive Committee of the Board of Visitors for MD Anderson Cancer Center. Mr. Zorn previously served as Trustee of the International Council of Shopping Centers, and has served several other organizations in various capacities, including the Foundation Board of Trustees for Mercy Hospital in Rogers, Arkansas, Professional Women in Construction (New York chapter) and the Susan G. Komen Foundation (NWA Chapter). Mr. Zorn studied history at Fairleigh Dickinson University. We believe that Mr. Zorn’s extensive experience, including leadership of real estate acquisitions and property management for Walmart Realty, makes him qualified to serve as a director.

-13-

Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR the election of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Meyer, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Mses. Ho and Pomerantz as directors.

A plurality of all of the votes cast in the election of directors at the Annual Meeting is necessary to elect a director. Proxies solicited by our board of directors will be voted FOR the election of Messrs. Baker, Indiveri, Neibart, Persico, Tanz and Zorn, and Mses. Ho and Pomerantz, unless otherwise instructed. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote on this proposal, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

We have a majority voting policy for the election of directors. In an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election is required to tender his or her resignation to our board of directors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is required to promptly consider the resignation and make a recommendation to our board of directors with respect to the tendered resignation. Our board of directors is required to take action with respect to this recommendation. Any director who tenders his or her resignation to our board of directors will not participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration or action by our board of directors regarding whether to accept such tendered resignation. The policy is more fully described below under “Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Guidelines—Majority Voting Policy.”

In accordance with our Charter and Bylaws, vacancies occurring on our board of directors, as a result of death, resignation, removal of a director, an increase in the authorized number of directors or otherwise, may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy shall serve for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor is elected and qualifies.

There are no family relationships, as defined under Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regulations, among any of our directors or executive officers.

-14-

PROPOSAL 2

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF the company’s
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our board of directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. Our board of directors is requesting that our stockholders ratify this appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.

The report of Ernst & Young LLP on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

Neither our Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of our board of directors’ appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, our board of directors is submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event that ratification of this appointment of independent registered public accounting firm is not approved at the Annual Meeting, our board of directors will review its future appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, our board of directors, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests.

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be provided with an opportunity to make a statement if so desired and to respond to appropriate inquiries from stockholders.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees (including related expenses) billed to us for professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

  Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
  2020(3) 2019(3)
Audit Fees(1) $772,000  $850,906 
Audit-Related Fees  —   — 
Tax Fees(2)  326,400   274,930 
All Other Fees  —   — 
Total $1,098,400  $1,125,836 

_______________________

(1)2020 and 2019 Audit Fees include fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP in respect of: (i) the audit of the consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K and services attendant to, or required by, statute or regulation; (ii) reviews of the interim consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; (iii) consents and other services related to SEC and other regulatory filings and communications; and (iv) accounting consultation attendant to the audit.

(2)2020 and 2019 Tax Fees include tax compliance, tax planning, tax advisory and related tax services provided by Ernst & Young LLP.

(3)Does not include fees relating to the audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting of $122,450 and $126,931 paid to Berdon LLP in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The charter of the Audit Committee of our board of directors (the “Audit Committee”) provides that the Audit Committee shall review and pre-approve the engagement fees and the terms of all auditing and non-auditing services to be provided by our external auditors which audit our financial statements and evaluate the effect thereof on the independence of such external auditors. All audit, tax and other services provided to us by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, were reviewed and pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by Ernst & Young LLP was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.

A majority of all of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting is required for its approval. Proxies solicited by our board of directors will be voted FOR this proposal, unless otherwise instructed. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote on this proposal, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

-15-

PROPOSAL 3

ApprovAL, on an advisory basis, OF the
compensation of the Company’s named executive officers

As required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote on the resolution to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with SEC rules in this Proxy Statement. This proposal is commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal. The compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement includes the disclosures under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosure in this Proxy Statement, as required by SEC rules.

In considering their vote, stockholders may wish to carefully review the information presented on our compensation policies and decisions regarding our named executive officers, as disclosed in detail in this Proxy Statement under “Executive Compensation.” Our board of directors believes that our long-term success depends in large measure on the talents of our management team and other employees and, as described below under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” we, through our executive compensation programs, seek to attract, motivate and retain top-quality senior executives who are committed to our core values of excellence and integrity. The fundamental philosophy of the Compensation Committee of our board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) is to closely align these compensation programs with the achievement of clear annual and long-term performance goals tied to our financial success and the creation of stockholder value. The Compensation Committee believes that it is important to create a compensation program that appropriately balances short-term, equity-based or cash-based compensation with long-term, equity-based compensation.

Our board of directors has determined that the best way to allow stockholders to vote on the compensation of our named executive officers is through the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company advise that they approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including the disclosure under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosure in the Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with SEC rules in this Proxy Statement. Although this vote is advisory and non-binding, our board of directors and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding compensation of our named executive officers.

Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR the resolution to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with SEC rules in this Proxy Statement, including the disclosure under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosure in this Proxy Statement.

A majority of all of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting is required for its approval. Proxies solicited by our board of directors will be voted FOR this proposal, unless otherwise instructed. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote on this proposal, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

-16-

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEE MATTERS

Board of Directors

Our board of directors is responsible for overseeing our affairs. Our board of directors conducts its business through meetings and actions taken by written consent in lieu of meetings. The policy of our board of directors, as set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), is to encourage and promote the attendance by each director at all scheduled meetings of our board of directors and all meetings of our stockholders. During the year ended December 31, 2020, our board of directors held eight meetings. During the year ended December 31, 2020, all of our directors attended at least 90% of the meetings of our board of directors including meetings of the committees of our board of directors of which they were members. In 2020, all directors then serving on our board of directors attended our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Committees of our Board of Directors

Our board of directors has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Audit Committee. Michael J. Indiveri (Chair), Angela K. Ho and Eric S. Zorn are the current members of the Audit Committee. Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent as required by NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, SEC rules governing the qualifications of audit committee members, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards (as defined below) and the written charter of the Audit Committee. Our board of directors has also determined, based upon its qualitative assessment of their relevant levels of knowledge and business experience (see “Proposal 1: Election of Directors—Nominees for Election as Directors” in this Proxy Statement for a description of their respective backgrounds and experience), that Ms. Ho and Mr. Indiveri each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of, and as defined by, SEC rules and has the requisite accounting or related financial management expertise required by NASDAQ corporate governance requirements. In addition, our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are financially literate as required by NASDAQ corporate governance requirements. The Audit Committee, which met four times during 2020, among other responsibilities, acts on behalf of our board of directors to discharge our board of directors’ responsibilities relating to our and our subsidiaries’ corporate accounting and reporting practices, the quality and integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the performance, qualifications and independence of our external auditors, the performance of our internal audit function and our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee is also responsible for approving and reviewing with management and external auditors the interim and audited annual financial statements, meeting with officers responsible for certifying our annual report on Form 10-K or any quarterly report on Form 10-Q prior to any such certification and reviewing with such officers disclosures related to any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls. The Audit Committee is charged with periodically discussing with our external auditors such auditors’ judgments about the quality, not just the acceptability, of our accounting principles as applied in our consolidated financial statements. The specific responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its written charter, a copy of which is available for viewing on our website at www.roireit.net.

Compensation Committee. Laura H. Pomerantz (Chair), Michael J. Indiveri and Charles J. Persico are the current members of the Compensation Committee. Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Compensation Committee are independent as required by NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, SEC rules governing the independence of compensation committee directors, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards and the written charter of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, which met three times during 2020, is responsible for, among other things, overseeing the approval, administration and evaluation of our compensation plans, policies and programs, and reviewing the compensation of our directors and our named executive officers. The specific responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its written charter, a copy of which is available for viewing on our website at www.roireit.net.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Eric S. Zorn (Chair), Michael J. Indiveri and Charles J. Persico are the current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent as required by NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, the Guidelines, the Independence Standards and the written charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which met two times during 2020, is responsible for, among other things, reviewing and making recommendations to our board of directors on the range of qualifications that should be represented on our board of directors and eligibility criteria for individual board membership, seeking, considering and recommending to our board of directors qualified candidates for election as directors and approving and recommending to the full board of directors succession plans for each of our named executive officers. It reviews and makes recommendations on matters involving the general operation of our board of directors and our corporate governance, and recommends to our board of directors nominees for each committee of our board of directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also annually facilitates the assessment of our board of directors’ performance as a whole and of the individual directors, and reports thereon to our board of directors. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing our ESG strategy development and taking our stockholders’ and other stakeholders’ perspectives into consideration when formulating ESG practices. The specific responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are set forth in its written charter, a copy of which is available for viewing on our website at www.roireit.net.

-17-

We will provide the written charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and/or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, free of charge, to stockholders who request them. Requests should be directed to Michael B. Haines, our Chief Financial Officer, at Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92130. The written charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and/or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are also available for viewing on our website at www.roireit.net.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee has furnished the following report for the 2020 fiscal year.

The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our system of internal controls, our risk management, the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, and our compliance with related legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to select, determine the compensation of, evaluate and, when appropriate, replace our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our board of directors.

Management is primarily responsible for our financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls, for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and for the report on our internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, was responsible for performing an independent audit of (i) our annual consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and (ii) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and expressing an opinion with respect thereto. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to oversee and review the financial reporting process and to review and discuss management’s report on our internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is not, however, professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing and does not provide any expert or other special assurance as to such financial statements concerning compliance with laws, regulations or accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or as to auditor independence. The Audit Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to it and on the representations made by our management and our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee held four meetings during 2020. The meetings were designed, among other things, to facilitate and encourage communication among the Audit Committee, management and Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed our ongoing compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard No. 5 regarding the audit of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the overall scope and plans for its audit. The Audit Committee reviewed reports and memoranda prepared by Ernst & Young LLP with respect to its audit of our internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee met with Ernst & Young LLP, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations and their evaluations of our internal controls.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, and the related report prepared by Ernst & Young LLP, with management and Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP management’s annual report on our internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP the process used to support certifications by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that are required by the SEC and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to accompany our periodic filings with the SEC and the processes used to support management’s annual report on our internal control over financial reporting. As a result of these discussions, the Audit Committee believes that we maintain an effective system of accounting controls that allows us to prepare consolidated financial statements that fairly present our financial position and results of our operations. Management represented to the Audit Committee that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

-18-

The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with Ernst & Young LLP their audit plan for us. The Audit Committee also discusses with Ernst & Young LLP matters that independent accounting firms must discuss with audit committees under generally accepted auditing standards and standards of the PCAOB, including, among other things, matters related to the conduct of the audit of our consolidated financial statements and the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC, which includes a discussion of Ernst & Young LLP’s judgments about the quality (not just the acceptability) of our accounting principles as applied to financial reporting.

The Audit Committee also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from us. Ernst & Young LLP provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence and represented that it is independent from us. When considering the independence of Ernst & Young LLP, the Audit Committee considered if services they provided to us, beyond those rendered in connection with their audit of our consolidated financial statements, their reviews of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and their audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, were compatible with maintaining their independence. The Audit Committee also reviewed and approved, among other things, the tax and other professional services performed by, and the amount of fees paid for such services to, Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee also received regular updates on the amount of fees and scope of audit, tax and other professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP.

Based on the Audit Committee’s review and these meetings, discussions and reports, and subject to the limitations on the Audit Committee’s role and responsibilities referred to above and in its written charter, the Audit Committee recommended to our board of directors that our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 be included in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The Audit Committee has also recommended the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 and is presenting this selection to our stockholders for ratification.

Michael J. Indiveri, Chair

Lee S. Neibart

Eric S. Zorn

The foregoing Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, to be (i) “soliciting material” or “filed” or (ii) incorporated by reference by any general statement into any filing made by us with the SEC, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such report by reference.

-19-

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

For the year ended December 31, 2020, each non-employee member of our board of directors was entitled to receive compensation for his or her services as a director as follows: (i) an annual cash retainer of $60,000 per year in cash; (ii) an annual equity award of $100,000 in value of restricted shares of Common Stock (“Restricted Shares”); (iii) a fee of $1,500 for each meeting of our board of directors attended in person or by teleconference; (iv) a fee of $1,500 for each meeting of a committee of our board of directors attended in person or by teleconference; and (v) annual chair fees of $20,000, $15,000 and $12,500 per year to each non-employee director acting as the Chair of the Audit Committee, Chair of the Compensation Committee and Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, respectively. Our board of directors has determined to increase the annual chair fees for the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to $20,000 each for the year ending December 31, 2021. Directors who are also our employees are not entitled to receive additional compensation for serving on our board of directors.

During 2020, the Compensation Committee engaged FTI Consulting Inc. (“FTI”) to serve as its compensation consultant in reviewing and evaluating our officer and director compensation levels and program, with the goal of creating a fair, reasonable and balanced compensation program that closely aligns the interest of our board of directors with those of our stockholders and reflect current practices in the marketplace. FTI received instructions from, and reported to, the Compensation Committee on an independent basis. FTI’s services to the Compensation Committee are discussed further below. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” Other than as described herein, FTI did not provide other services to us or any of our affiliates during 2020.

The following table summarizes the annual compensation received by our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2020.

2020 Director Compensation
Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) Stock Awards ($)(2)(3) Total ($)
Michael J. Indiveri  98,500   99,997   198,497 
Edward H. Meyer  86,500   99,997   186,497 
Lee S. Neibart  77,000   99,997   176,997 
Charles J. Persico  77,000   99,997   176,997 
Laura H. Pomerantz  90,500   99,997   190,497 
Eric S. Zorn  77,000   99,997   176,997 

______________________

(1)Amounts in this column represent annual retainer, board of directors meeting fees and Committee meeting and Chair fees paid to non-employee directors for service in 2020.

(2)Amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of such awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). The grant date fair values of awards have been determined based on the assumptions and methodologies set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (Note 8, Stock Compensation and Other Benefit Plans for ROIC).

(3)As of December 31, 2020, each of our non-employee directors held 5,662 unvested Restricted Shares. All of such Restricted Shares vested on January 1, 2021.

On April 25, 2018, the stockholders of the Company approved and the Company adopted the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan”) which replaced the original Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Original 2009 Equity Incentive Plan”). During 2020, non-employee directors were eligible to receive grants of stock options (“Options”), Restricted Shares, long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) units, which represent a class of partnership interests in our operating partnership, Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, L.P. (our “operating partnership”), share appreciation rights, phantom shares, dividend equivalents and other equity-based awards under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.

-20-

INFORMATION REGARDING OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our President and Chief Executive Officer is Stuart A. Tanz. The non-Executive Chairman of our board of directors is Richard A. Baker. Our Chief Financial Officer is Michael B. Haines. Our Chief Operating Officer is Richard K. Schoebel. For Messrs. Tanz’s and Baker’s biographies, please see “Proposal 1: Election of Directors—Nominees for Election as Directors.” The following sets forth the biographical information for Messrs. Haines and Schoebel as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Michael B. Haines, 59, has served as our Chief Financial Officer since December 2012. Prior to December 2012, Mr. Haines served as Chief Accounting Officer at Pacific Office Properties Trust, Inc., a publicly traded real estate investment trust that owns and operates institutional quality office properties in Hawaii and Southern California. From September 2009 until joining Pacific Office Properties Trust, Inc. in October 2010, Mr. Haines was Chief Accounting Officer at American Realty Advisors, an SEC-registered investment advisor and provider of real estate investment management services to institutional investors. From January 2007 to September 2008, he was Chief Financial Officer at Hopkins Real Estate Group, a firm that specializes in retail shopping center development and re-development. Prior to January 2007, for approximately 12 years, he held various financial and accounting positions, including Vice President, Finance, at Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc., a real estate investment trust that specialized in the acquisition, ownership and management of community and neighborhood shopping centers for everyday essentials. Prior to joining Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc., Mr. Haines was Director of Internal Audit for The Hahn Company, a developer and owner of regional shopping malls throughout the United States, and a Senior Auditor at Deloitte & Touche, LLP. Mr. Haines received a Bachelors in Business Administration from San Diego State University. Mr. Haines is a California-licensed Certified Public Accountant and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the California Society of Certified Public Accountants.

Richard K. Schoebel, 55, has served as our Chief Operating Officer since 2009. Prior to 2009, Mr. Schoebel served as the Vice President, Property Management for the West Region of Centro Properties Group (US). In this role, he was responsible for 8.9 million square feet of community and neighborhood shopping centers. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Schoebel was a Principal and Managing Member of Pacific Spectrum Properties, LLC, a brokerage firm providing leasing, management and consulting services to shopping center owners. Prior to that, for 12 years he held numerous positions at Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc., ultimately serving as Vice President, Operations, where he directed the leasing and property management for a portfolio of 38 shopping centers, encompassing five million leasable square feet. Mr. Schoebel has over 26 years of real estate industry experience, specializing in shopping centers. Mr. Schoebel received a B.S. in Management with a minor in Applied Computer Science from Keene State College in New Hampshire.

-21-

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Role and Leadership Structure of our Board of Directors and Risk Oversight

Pursuant to our Charter, Bylaws and the Maryland General Corporation Law, our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors. Our board of directors has the responsibility for establishing broad corporate policies and for our overall performance and direction, but is not involved in our day-to-day operations. Members of our board of directors keep informed of our business by participating in meetings of our board of directors and its committees, by reviewing analyses, reports and other materials provided to them and through discussions with the Chairman of our board of directors, President and Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers.

We maintain separate roles for our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board of directors.

Our board of directors believes that the composition of our board of directors protects stockholder interests and provides sufficient independent oversight of our management. A majority of our current directors are “independent” under NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, as more fully described under “—Director Independence.” The independent directors meet separately from our management on a regular basis at the conclusion of our board of directors’ regularly scheduled meetings. The independent directors oversee such critical matters as the integrity of our financial statements, the evaluation and compensation of our directors and executive officers and the selection and evaluation of directors.

Each independent director has the ability to add items to the agenda of board of directors meetings or raise subjects for discussion that are not on the agenda for that meeting. In addition, our board of directors and each committee of our board of directors has complete and open access to our executive officers.

Our board of directors believes that its majority independent composition and the roles that our independent directors perform provide effective corporate governance at the board of directors level and independent oversight of both our board of directors and our executive officers. The current leadership model, when combined with the functioning of the independent director component of our board of directors and our overall corporate governance structure, strikes an appropriate balance between strong and consistent leadership and independent oversight of our business and affairs.

In connection with their oversight of risk to our business, our board of directors and the Audit Committee consider feedback from our executive officers concerning the risks related to our business, our operations and strategies. Our executive officers regularly report to our board of directors on risks relating to our property acquisitions, our leverage and hedging policies, our capital availability and our internal control and procedures. Members of our board of directors routinely meet with our executive officers, as appropriate, in connection with their consideration of matters submitted for the approval of our board of directors and the risks associated with such matters.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Conduct was designed to assist directors, officers and employees in complying with the law, and in resolving moral and ethical issues that may arise in complying with our policies and procedures. Among the areas addressed by the Code of Conduct are compliance with applicable laws, conflicts of interest, use and protection of our assets, confidentiality, communications with the public, internal accounting controls, improper influence of audits, records retention, fair dealing, discrimination and harassment, money laundering, human rights and health and safety. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for monitoring our board of directors’ governance process and will make recommendations, as appropriate, to the Chairman of our board of directors on governance and related matters. The Code of Conduct is available for viewing on our website at www.roireit.net. We will also provide the Code of Conduct, free of charge, to stockholders who request it. Requests should be directed to Michael B. Haines, our Chief Financial Officer, at Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92130.

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

Our board of directors has adopted the Guidelines, which address significant issues of corporate governance, and set forth procedures by which our board of directors carries out its responsibilities. Among the areas addressed by the Guidelines are the composition of our board of directors, functions and responsibilities of our board of directors, the committees of our board of directors, director qualification standards, access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, management succession, director orientation and continuing education and the annual performance evaluation review of our board of directors and the committees of our board of directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing the Guidelines and will make recommendations, as appropriate, to the Chairman of our board of directors on governance and related matters.

 

 -17--22- 

 

Majority Vote Policy

 

The Guidelines provide for a majority voting policy for the election of directors. Pursuant to this policy, in any uncontested election of directors, any nominee who, of the votes cast in such election with respect to such nominee, receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall promptly tender his or her resignation to our board of directors following certification of the stockholder vote. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall promptly consider the resignation and make a recommendation to our board of directors with respect to the tendered resignation. In considering whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall consider all factors it deems relevant, which may include the stated reasons, if any, why stockholders withheld votes from the director, any alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes, the length of service and qualifications of the director, the director’s past and expected future contributions to ourthe Company, the composition of our board of directors, and such other information and factors as members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall determine are relevant.

 

Our board of directors will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation no later than 90 days after the certification of the stockholder vote. Any director who tenders his or her resignation to our board of directors will not participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration or board action regarding whether to accept such tendered resignation.

 

We will promptly disclose our board of director’s decision whether to accept the resignation as tendered (providing a full explanation of the process by which the decision was reached and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation) in a press release, a filing with the SEC or in another broadly disseminated means of communication.

 

The Guidelines are available for viewing on our website at www.roireit.net. We will also provide the Guidelines, free of charge, to stockholders who request them. Requests should be directed to Michael B. Haines, our Chief Financial Officer, at Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92130.

 

Director Independence

 

The Guidelines provide that a majority of the directors serving on our board of directors must be independent as required by NASDAQ corporate governance requirements. As permitted under the Guidelines, our board of directors has adopted certain categorical standards (the “Independence Standards”) to assist it in making determinations with respect to the independence of directors. Based upon its review of all relevant facts and circumstances, our board of directors has affirmatively determined that sixseven of our eightnine current directors, Angela K. Ho, Michael J. Indiveri, Edward H. Meyer, Lee S. Neibart, Charles J. Persico, Laura H. Pomerantz and Eric S. Zorn, qualify as independent directors under NASDAQ corporate governance requirements and the Independence Standards. The Independence Standards are available for viewing on our website at www.roireit.net.

 

Policy Concerning Hedging and Pledging Transactions

 

Our Corporate Policy Regarding Equity Transactions (the “Policy”) contains policies that prohibit our officers, directors, employees and consultants from engaging in transactions of a speculative nature involving our securities. The Policy prohibits short sales and hedging transactions, and also generally prohibits transactions involving derivative securities, such as options, warrants, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights or similar rights whose value is derived from the value of our equity securities. The Policy prohibits all of our directors and officers from margining our securities, holding our securities in a margin account or pledging our securities as collateral for a loan, and also prohibits all other persons subject to the Policy from engaging in such activities unless they have been approved in writing by our compliance officer. No such approvals have been granted to date.

 

-18-

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

To align the interests of our senior executives and stockholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee expects our executive officers to acquire significant ownership of equity in the Company (“Company Equity”). Accordingly, we have adopted stock ownership guidelines (the “Stock Ownership Guidelines”) requiring each executive officer to achieve a Company Equity ownership level equal to a specified multiple of his or her base salary. The minimum equity ownership levels as a multiple of base salary are as follows: six times for the Chief Executive Officer; three times for the non-Executive Chairman of our board of directors; and three times for other executive officers.

 

-23-

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has also adopted a guideline for directors to achieve significant ownership of Company Equity. Our directors are expected to achieve a Company Equity ownership level equal to a minimum of three times their annual cash retainer.

 

Company Equity owned by a spouse of an executive officer or a director shall count toward the executive officer or director achieving the applicable Company Equity ownership level. Company Equity held in a trust established by an executive officer or director (and/or his or her spouse) shall count toward the executive officer or director achieving the applicable Company Equity ownership level if the trust is revocable by the executive officer or director (and/or his or her spouse) or is for the benefit of the executive officer or director, the spouse of the executive officer or director, and/or the family members of the executive officer or director.

 

Executive officers and directors have a five-year grace period to comply with the Stock Ownership Guidelines, commencing on the date which is the later of the adoption of the Stock Ownership Guidelines and upon appointment to a new position. If, at the end of the five-year grace period, any executive officer or director does not achieve the requisite Company Equity ownership level, we will require such executive officer or director to hold all vested awards of Company Equity and derivatives exercisable for Company Equity, other than awards withheld to pay withholding taxes or the exercise price of options or other derivative securities, until the required ownership level has been satisfied. Additionally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reserves the right to provide exceptions for extenuating personal circumstances on a case-by-case basis.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviewed the holdings of the persons serving as our executive officers and directors at December 31, 2020 in light of the Stock Ownership Guidelines as of the end of the year ended December 31, 2017 and determined that all of our executive officers and directors met the Stock Ownership Guidelines as required.

 

Review and Approval of Related-Party Transactions

 

Our board of directors has adopted written policies and procedures for review, approval and ratification of transactions involving us and “related parties” (directors, executive officers or stockholders beneficially owning 5% or greater of our outstanding Common Stock, or their immediate family members). The policies and procedures cover any related-party transaction that meets the minimum threshold for disclosure in the Proxy Statement under the relevant SEC rules (generally, transactions involving amounts exceeding $120,000 in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest). A summary of these policies and procedures is set forth below:

 

Policies

 

·Any covered related-party transaction must be approved by our board of directors or by a committee of our board of directors consisting solely of disinterested directors. In considering the transaction, our board of directors or such committee will consider all relevant factors, including, as applicable, (i) our business rationale for entering into the transaction; (ii) the available alternatives; (iii) whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those available to or from third parties; (iv) the potential for the transaction to lead to an actual or apparent conflict of interest; and (v) the overall fairness of the transaction to us.

 

·On at least an annual basis, our board of directors or a committee thereof will monitor the transaction to assess whether it is advisable for us to amend or terminate the transaction.

 

 -19--24- 

 

Procedures

 

·Management or the affected director or executive officer will bring the matter to the attention of the Chair of the Audit Committee or, if the Chair of the Audit Committee is the affected director, to the attention of the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

 

·The appropriate Chair shall determine whether the matter should be considered by our board of directors or by a committee of our board of directors consisting solely of disinterested directors.

 

·If a director is involved in the transaction, he or she will be recused from all discussions and decisions about the transaction, except that the director shall provide all material information concerning the transaction.

 

·The transaction must be approved in advance whenever practicable and, if not practicable, must be ratified as promptly as practicable.

 

·If the transaction will be ongoing, our board of directors or a committee of our board of directors consisting solely of disinterested directors may establish guidelines for our management to follow in its ongoing dealings with the related party. Thereafter, our board of directors or a committee of our board of directors consisting solely of disinterested directors, on at least an annual basis, will review and assess ongoing relationships with the related party to see that they are in compliance with the guidelines and that the transaction remains appropriate.

 

·All related-party transactions will be disclosed in our applicable filings with the SEC as required under SEC rules.

 

Identification of Director Candidates

 

In accordance with the Guidelines and its written charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying director candidates for our board of directors and for recommending director candidates to our board of directors for consideration as nominees to stand for election at our annual meetings of stockholders.stockholder meetings. Director candidates are recommended for nomination for election as directors in accordance with the procedures set forth in the written charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

 

We seek to have a board of directors representing diverse educational backgrounds and different work and life experiences that provide a range of insights into the financial, governmental or legal matters that are relevant to our business and to our status as a publicly owned company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews the appropriate skills and characteristics required of our directors in the context of the current composition of our board of directors, our operating requirements and the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also evaluates the length of service of members of our board of directors with a view towards periodically adding new members that can bring fresh insights and perspectives to our strategic thinking and enhance the manner in which our business and affairs are supervised by our board of directors. We also believe that the nominees have developed unique and valuable expertise, knowledge and insights about our company,the Company, our operations, our market and our industry during their tenure as directors. In accordance with the Guidelines, directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, exercise good business judgment and be committed to representing the long-term interests of ourthe Company and our stockholders. Directors should also have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews director candidates with the objective of assembling a slate of directors that can best fulfill and promote our goals, regardless of gender, age or race, and recommends director candidates based upon contributions they can make to our board of directors and management and their ability to represent our long-term interests and those of our stockholders.

 

When our board of directors considers adding a member to fill an existing vacancy or newly created position, or any other time the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes our board of directors should consider adding a member, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies and assesses director candidates and makes recommendations to our board of directors based upon the results of such search. In conducting this assessment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers knowledge, experience, skills, diversity and such other factors as it deems appropriate in light of our current needs and those of our board of directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives input on such director candidates from other directors, and recommends director candidates to our board of directors for nomination. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not solicit director nominations, but will consider recommendations by stockholders with respect to elections to be held at an annual meeting, so long as such recommendations are sent on a timely basis and in accordance with our Bylaws and applicable law. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate nominees recommended by stockholders against the same criteria that it uses to evaluate other nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may, in its sole discretion, engage one or more search firms and/or other consultants, experts or professionals to assist in, among other things, identifying director candidates or gathering information regarding the background and experience of director candidates. If the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee engages any such third party, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will have sole authority to approve any fees or terms of retention relating to these services.

 

 -20--25- 

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our board of directors identified the need for another director that could bring additional accounting and finance expertise and diversity to our board of directors. On February 23, 2021, our board of directors elected Angela K. Ho to become a new independent director effective March 1, 2021. Ms. Ho has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of OceanFirst Bank since 2016. Ms. Ho previously served as Vice President and Controller at Northfield Bank, Accounting Policy Manager at Signature Bank and worked at KPMG in the New York Financial Services Practice. Ms. Ho has been awarded American Banker’s 2020 Most Powerful Women in Banking: Next List, Asian American Business Development Center’s 2018 Outstanding 50 Asian Americans in Business, and New Jersey Bankers Association’s 2015 New Leaders in Banking.

Our stockholders of record who comply with the current advanced notice procedures set forth in our Bylaws and outlined under the “Submission of Stockholder Proposals” section of this Proxy Statement may nominate director candidates for election to our board of directors. StockholderNotice of stockholder nominations of director candidates at our annual meeting of stockholders must be received by our Secretary not earlier than the 150th day nor later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, in the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the 150th day prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the later of the 120th day prior to the date of such annual meeting, as originally convened, or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. The public announcement of a postponement or adjournment of an annual meeting will not commence a new time period for the giving of a stockholder’s notice as described above. Accordingly, to submit a director candidate for consideration for nomination at our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholders must submit the nomination, in writing, by November 26, 2018,2021, but in no event earlier than October 26, 2018.27, 2021. The written notice must set forth the information required by our Bylaws. The advanced notice procedures set forth in our Bylaws do not affect the right of stockholders to request the inclusion of proposals in our proxy statement pursuant to SEC rules. See the “Submission of Stockholder Proposals” section of this Proxy Statement for information regarding providing timely notice of stockholder proposals under SEC rules.

 

Personal Loans to Executive Officers and Directors

 

We comply with, and operate in a manner consistent with, applicable law prohibiting extensions of credit in the form of personal loans to or for the benefit of our directors and executive officers.

 

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders

 

We have scheduled a meeting of our board of directors in conjunction with the Annual Meeting and, as set forth in the Guidelines, our policy is to encourage and promote the attendance by each director at all scheduled meetings of our board of directors and all meetings of our stockholders.

 

Stockholder Outreach and Engagement

 

We believe that fostering long-term relationships with our stockholders and maintaining their trust is a key ROIC objective, and we recognize the value of listening to and understanding their views about our business. We conduct stockholder outreach throughout the year, dialoguing and meeting with key institutional stockholders, in an effort to proactively address important issues. Our Chief Executive Officer, Stuart A. Tanz, and other members of our senior management team were in regular contact with stockholders during 20172020 and conducted in excess of 200139 scheduled investor meetings on important topics including ROIC’s strategy, performance, corporate governance, executive compensation and other related matters. Our management provides regular updates to our board of directors regarding these discussions and stockholder feedback. Our board of directors takes our stockholders’ and other stakeholders’ perspectives into consideration when overseeing ourthe Company’s strategy, formulating governance and ESG practices and designing executive compensation programs. For example, in response to feedback received from our stockholder engagement activities, we introduced modifications to our executive compensation program in February 2016 that included increasing the portion of annual incentive cash bonuses that was based solely on the achievement of objective performance criteria and decreasing the discretionary component, adjusting the weighting levels of such performance criteria to emphasize the achievement of operating metrics such as growth in FFO per share and dividend growth and, with respect to long-term equity-based awards, adjusting the performance-based vesting criteria and measurement periods. Also, in February 2017, the Compensation Committee took into account feedback received from stockholder engagement activities during the prior year and made several modifications to the employment agreements of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer to reflect best practices in the marketplace. These modifications included, among others, incorporating “double trigger” provisions for severance payments upon a change in control of the Company rather than “modified single trigger” provisions and, with respect to our Chief Executive Officer, eliminating excise tax gross-up provisions on severance paid in connection with a termination following a change in control of the Company. The employment agreements of our other executive officers do not contain such excise tax gross-up provisions. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” We are pleased that stockholders strongly supported our executive compensation program in the 20172020 advisory “say on pay” vote, with approximately 97%97.5% of the votes cast approving our advisory resolution.

 

 -21--26- 

 

We believe that our outreach program ensures that our management and our board of directors understand our stockholders’ views and concerns and are able to address the issues that are important to them. We are continuing our stockholder outreach efforts in 2018,2021, in addition to our customary participation at industry conferences, investor roadshows and meetings with analysts, and remain committed to this ongoing initiative.

 

Communications with our Board of Directors

 

Our board of directors has established a process by which stockholders or other interested parties may communicate in writing with the Chairchair of any committee of our board of directors or the independent directors of our board of directors as a group. Any such communication sent by e-mail should be sent to stockholdercommunications@roireit.net. Any such communications sent by U.S. mail or overnight delivery should be directed to the attention of the Independent Directors, the Chair of the Audit Committee, the Chair of the Compensation Committee, or the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as the case may be, in each instance in care of the Company, at Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92130. Our representative will forward them to the intended recipient(s). We reserve the right to disregard any communication that our Chief Executive Officer determines is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal, does not reasonably relate to us or our business, or is similarly inappropriate. Our Chief Executive Officer has the authority to disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any such inappropriate communications. Our board of directors has approved this communication process.

 

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

 

It is the policy of our board of directors, in accordance with the Guidelines, that the independent directors serving on our board of directors meet separately without management (including management directors) in executive session at least four times per year at regularly scheduled meetings of our board of directors.

 

Amendments to Charter

 

Amendments to our Charter generally require the affirmative vote of holders of shares entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. The affirmative vote of holders of shares entitled to cast at least two-thirds of votes entitled to be cast on a matter is only required (a) to remove a member of the board of directors, (b) to amend certain Charter provisions established to enable our qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or (c) to amend the sentence in our Charter providing for the affirmative vote requirements described in (a) and (b).

 

-22-

Other Governance Matters

 

In overseeing our corporate policies and our overall performance and direction, our board of directors has adopted the approach of operating in what it believes are the long-term best interests of ourthe Company and our stockholders. In operating under these principles, our board of directors continuously reviews our corporate governance and considers whether any changes are necessary or desirable. As part of this review our board of directors considered an amendment to our Bylaws to allow our stockholders (without the concurrence of our board of directors) to implement bylaw amendments. Our board of directors initially considered this matter when stockholders approved our redomiciliation as a Maryland corporation at the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders and we explained to our stockholders the changes that would result to the way amendments to our bylaws would be implemented as a result of the redomiciliation. After careful consideration of this matter, our board of directors concluded that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and ourthe Company if authority to amend our bylaws is vested exclusively in our board of directors because, under Maryland law, our directors must act with a reasonable belief that their actions are in the best interests of ourthe Company. On the other hand, under Maryland law, stockholders are not bound by any such legal duty and are permitted to take or to recommend actions that are in their own individual interests as stockholders without taking into account the broader interests of other stockholders or the interests of ourthe Company. Beyond this factor, a significant percentage of our stockholders at any given time could consist of exchange traded or index funds that do not normally exercise independent judgment on matters presented to stockholders. As a result of these factors, we continue to believe that our directors are in the best position to determine whether to enact possible future bylaw amendments (including those proposed by our stockholders). We remain committed to engaging with our stockholders and hearing their views about our business, including corporate governance matters, and will adopt amendments to our organizational documents only after concluding that such amendments are in the best interests of ourthe Company.

 

 -23--27- 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of the compensation programs offered to our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee is responsible for the administration of our compensation plans, policies and programs and for making recommendations relating to the compensation of our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee endeavors to ensure that the compensation paid to our named executive officers is consistent with our overall philosophy on compensation and market practices.

 

Executive SummaryFiscal 2020 Performance Highlights

 

Fiscal 2017 Performance

ROICDuring 2020, in the face of extraordinary circumstances due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company delivered another year of strong operating performance in 2017.and financial performance. We achieved significant growth incontinued the disciplined execution of our portfolio across ourstrategy focused on necessity-based community and neighborhood shopping centers on the West Coast, markets and continued to produce strong operating results and financial performance while maintaining a flexible and conservative financial position. Key highlights includewhich resulted in the following:

 

·Exceptional operational performance in the retail REIT industry:

-$32.0 million of net income attributable to common stockholders ($0.27 per diluted share)

-$132.5 million in FFO(1)

-90.6% of total billed base rent during pandemic has been paid as of February 18, 2021 (2Q’20 - 4Q’20)

-96.8% of our gross leasable area (including 100% of anchor space) was leased at December 31, 2020, the 8th consecutive year above 96.0%

-1.2 million square feet of leases were executed, representing the 10th consecutive year of leasing approximately double the square footage originally scheduled to expire

-Achieved growth in fundssame-space cash rents on new leases of 12.5% and 7.9% growth on renewals

-Awarded investment grade rating and stable outlook from operations (“FFO”Fitch Ratings, Inc.

-Awarded Best Retail REIT (U.S.)(1) of 5.6% to $1.14 per diluted share 2020 by CFI.co

 

·Completed ten acquisitions totaling approximately $357.6 millionMaintained our strong balance sheet:

 

·-Increased annual dividend by 4.2% to $0.75 from $0.72 per share

·97.5% of our gross leasable area was leased at December 31, 2017

·Increased size of our shopping center property portfolio by 11% to 10.4 million square feet

·Achieved same-store net operating income (“NOI”)(1) growth of 3.1%

·Raised $408.8 million of capital to fund our growth through the issuance of shares of common stock, operating partnership units, senior unsecured notes and an increase in borrowing capacity under our credit facility

·Approximately 90%96.5% of our total outstanding indebtedness was effectively fixed-rate(2) at year-end, a record for the Company, and approximately 92%94.5% of our gross leasable area was unencumbered at December 31, 20172020

______________

-Maintained 3.4x interest coverage

-Reduced outstanding debt by $36.6 million

·Continued execution of strategic growth:

-Continued focus on densification initiatives

-Continued development of our ESG programs

-Continued focus on acquiring shopping centers where our team has the opportunity to build value

____________________________

(1)For a description of FFO, market capitalization and NOI, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.“—Elements of Executive Compensation.”

 

(2)Represents indebtedness that bears interest at a fixed-rate or is subject to interest rate swap agreements pursuant to which the Company makes fixed-rate payments.

 

We believe that the value creation produced from an investment in real estate should be assessed over a long-term period and our strategy has focused on and continues to focus on long-term value creation. During 2017,2020, in the face of challenging business conditions in the broader retail market,addition to creating value through our property operations and leasing activities, we continued to enhance the disciplined executionlong-term competitive position and intrinsic value of our strategy focused onportfolio through the implementation of strategic initiatives. These initiatives include our densification initiatives and development of our ESG programs. The economic benefits of our activities in these areas during 2020 will not be realized until subsequent years. However, we believe these initiatives, when combined with the strength of our in-place portfolio of necessity-based community and neighborhood shopping centers on the West Coast. We increasedCoast that we have assembled over the size of our portfolio by selectively acquiring ten additional shopping centers located in our target markets, strengthened our already sound balance sheet and, through our operating and leasing initiatives, continued our track record of producing strong operating results while enhancing the long-term, intrinsic value of our properties. Our operational success has translated into strong total and relativepast decade, will help position us to continue to generate attractive returns for stockholders over the long-term. The following table sets forth our stockholders, as indicated inTSR performance over the table below.one, three, five and seven-year periods ended December 31, 2020.

 

-28-

Total Stockholder Return(1)ROIC:

ROIC:        Retail Opportunity

Investments Corp.

SNL:          SNL U.S. REIT Retail Index

MSCI:        MSCI US REIT Index

Peers(2):   Executive Compensation Peer Group Median

1-Year 3-Year 5-Year 7-Year     SNL:SNL US REIT
 Retail Index
MSRI 5.07% ROIC 33.0% ROIC 89.2% ROIC 165.3%MSRI:Morgan Stanley
 ROICMSCI -2.0%-7.57%  MSRI 17.0%MSCI 10.99%  MSRI 56.3%MSCI 26.65%  MSRI 100.6%MSCI 69.29% 
ROIC -22.97%REIT IndexROIC -25.56%ROIC -10.82%ROIC 17.66%
SNL-5.0%-26.07%SNL -27.07%SNL 0.0%-30.60%SNL 31.8% SNL 86.4%Peers(2):Executive Compensation-7.65%
Peers-7.8%-33.05%Peers-7.6%-41.65%Peers -48.90%Peers 20.3% Peers 30.1%Peer Group Median-26.14%

_______________

_______________________

(1)The table above compares the cumulative total return on our Common Stock over the one, three, five and seven-year periods ended December 31, 20172020 to the cumulativetotal return of comparable indices and our executive compensation peer group, assuming a $100 investment on January 1, 20112013 and assuming all dividends werehave been reinvested.

(2)For more information about our executive compensation peer group, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—“—Setting Executive Compensation—Peer Group.”

 

-24-

Stockholder Outreach and Engagement.

 

We believe that fostering long-term relationships with our stockholders and maintaining their trust is a key ROIC objective, and we recognize the value of listening to and understanding their views about our business. During 2017,2020, we continued our stockholder outreach activities, dialoguing and meeting with key institutional stockholders, in an effort to proactively address important issues.

 

·Our Chief Executive Officer, Stuart A. Tanz, and other members of our senior management team were in regular contact with stockholders during 20172020 and conducted in excess of 200139 scheduled investor meetings to discuss a broad range of topics, including executive compensation.

 

·We considered the modifications that the Compensation Committee implemented to our executive compensation program in 2016 and 2017implemented by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) and the results of last year’srecent non-binding, advisory votevotes on the compensation of our named executive officers. At each of our 2016 and 2017 Annual Meetings,last four annual stockholder meetings, stockholders showed strong support for our executive compensation program, with approximately 97%more than 97.5% of the votes cast approving our advisory resolution at each meeting.

 

·Based on feedback received during the year and the strong support that stockholders showed for our executive compensation program in the 20172020 advisory “say on pay” vote, the Compensation Committee maintained the principal elements of our executive compensation program when setting compensation for 2017.2021 while making certain adjustments in response to market dynamics for retail REITs.

 

Executive Compensation Guidelines Highlights.

 

We are pleased that stockholders strongly supported our executive compensation program in the 20172020 advisory “say on pay” vote, with approximately 97%97.5% of the votes cast approving our advisory resolution. We attribute this result to the Compensation Committee’s commitment to designing and implementing an executive compensation program that aligns executive compensation with Company performance and the creation of sustainable stockholder value, and view it as an indication that stockholders are supportive of the Compensation Committee’s approach to executive compensation and our responsiveness to investor concerns.

 

Our executive compensation program includes the following key features which have been implemented by the Compensation Committee as follows:

What We DoHighlights
Formulaic cash bonus program tied to rigorous objective performance criteria

-        85% of our Chief Executive Officer’s incentive cash bonus opportunity is based solely on the achievement of objective Company performance criteria, with 15% determined at the Compensation Committee’s discretion based on a subjective review of overall Company and individual performance

-        For the 2018 performance year, the objective Company performance criteria will represent 90% of our Chief Executive Officer’s incentive cash bonus opportunity

-        Use Company performance criteria that emphasize the achievement of operating and financial metrics that drive stockholder value creation, including FFO per share and dividend growth
Equity compensation program linked to long-term performance and promote retention-        Allocate 50% of stock grants to performance-based equity awards and 50% to time-based equity awards
-        Performance-based equity awards require the achievement of both absolute and relative TSR performance measures in order for the maximum amount of awards to be earned
-        In order to earn the maximum award amount, in respect of the absolute and relative TSR components, the Company must achieve absolute TSR equal to or greater than 30% and TSR must rank at or above the 70th percentile of the performance peer group, respectively, in each case measured over a three-year cumulative period
 -25--29- 

 

Each component of compensation plays a role in supporting our compensation goals and objectives consisting of the following key components:

What We DoElements of PayHighlightsFormLinks to PerformancePurposes
StrongBase SalaryFixed Cash

Determined based on:

·   Evaluation of individual’s experience 

·   Current performance 

·   Internal pay equity and a comparison to the executive compensation peer group

·   Recognize ongoing performance of job responsibilities and contributions to Company success 

·   Attract and retain executive talent

Annual Cash IncentivesVariable Incentive Cash

Our Chief Executive Officer’s annual cash incentive bonus opportunity for 2021 is 80% based on pre-established objective Company performance metrics, with 20% based on the Compensation Committee’s review of the Company’s and each named executive officer’s individual performance. For 2021, the incentive bonus structure contains four key corporate governance standardsmetrics:

·   FFO per share (20%)

·   Capital Raising (20%)

·   Year-End Leased Occupancy (20%)

·   Same-Center NOI Growth (20%)(1)

·   Discretionary (20%)

The above represents the weightings for our Chief Executive Officer, while the weightings for our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer also include additional role-specific objective criteria see “—Elements of Executive Compensation—Annual Cash Incentives.”

-        Require·   Reward the achievement of short-term corporate operating and financial objectives and individual contributions on an annual-basis 

·   Drive stockholder value creation 

·  Chosen for alignment with the Company’s strategic goals for the year

Long-Term Equity-Based AwardsTime-Based Equity Awards

Represents 50% of the overall equity award, which is determined based on:

·   TSR performance

·   Execution of the Company’s long-term strategic plan

·   Named executive officers’ compensation levels compared to our executive compensation peer group

Shares vest ratably over a three-year period, subject to continued service

·   Support the retention of executives

·   Subject recipients to the same market fluctuations as stockholders

·   Motivate management to create long-term stockholder value

·   Reinforce our named executive officers’ alignment of interests with our stockholders’ interests over the long-term

·   Ensure that our named executive officers maintain a long-term focus that serves the best interests of the Company

Performance-Based Equity Awards

Represents 50% of the overall equity award and is subject to the achievement of performance goals over a three-year period. For performance-based equity awards for 2020, the performance criteria are aligned with the Company’s long-term strategic goals and will be earned at the end of year three based on:

·   ESG Milestone Achievements (25%)

·   Average Year-End Occupancy (25%)

·   Average Year-End Same-Center NOI Growth (25%)

·   Relative TSR (25%)

·   Enhance pay-for-performance structure and stockholder alignment

·  Motivate and reward management to successfully execute on the Company’s long-term strategy

·   Motivate and reward our named executive officers for delivering stockholder returns exceeding those of our performance comparison peer group companies

(1)For a description of net operating income (“NOI”), see “—Elements of Executive Compensation.”

Our executive compensation program also incorporates strong corporate governance standards designed to promote the interests of our stockholders, including:

·requiring a “double trigger” for severance payments upon a change in controlcontrol;

-        No
·no excise tax gross-up provisionsprovisions;

-30-

-        Prohibit
·prohibiting hedging or pledging of Company securitiessecurities;

-        Maintain
·maintaining stock ownership guidelines for our named executive officers and directorsdirectors;

-        Employ
·employing a majority voting policy for the election of directors in uncontested electionselections;

-        Use
·using an independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directorsdirectors; and

-        Prohibit
·prohibiting the repricing of stock options without stockholder approval

approval.

 

For a detailed description of these modifications, see “—2017 Compensation Strategy” and “—Equity Grants.”

Overview. On October 20, 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with Richard A. Baker, the Chairman of our board of directors.  On April 2, 2012, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Baker which provided that he would transition from Executive Chairman to non-executive Chairman of our board of directors and amended Mr. Baker’s compensation arrangements.  On March 21, 2017, we entered into new employment agreements with each of Stuart A. Tanz, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Richard K. Schoebel, our Chief Operating Officer and Michael B. Haines, our Chief Financial Officer. The new employment agreements modified the terms of such executive officers’ previous employment agreements to reflect best practices in the marketplace, as described in detail under “—Setting Executive Compensation.” Each of Messrs. Tanz, Schoebel and Haines is referred to herein as a “named executive officer.” In addition, although Mr. Baker, the Chairman of our board of directors, does not hold any executive office with our Company, due to the nature of his letter agreement and the compensation he is entitled to earn under such agreement, we also refer to Mr. Baker herein as a “named executive officer.” See “—Employment and Letter Agreements and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements.”

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives.

We, through our executive compensation program, seek to attract, motivate and retain top-quality senior executives who are committed to our core values of excellence and integrity. The Compensation Committee’s fundamental philosophy is to closely align our compensation programs with the achievement of clear annual and long-term performance goals tied to our financial success and the creation of stockholder value.

 

The Compensation Committee’s objectives in developing and administering the executive compensation programs are to:

 

·attract, retain and motivate a highly skilledhighly-skilled senior executive team that will contribute to the successful performance of ourthe Company;

 

·align the interests of the senior executive team with the interests of our stockholders by motivating executives to increase long-term stockholder value;

 

·provide compensation opportunities that are competitive within industry standards, thereby reflecting the value of the position in the marketplace;

 

·set clear performance goals and objectives which provide accountability for our named executive officers;

 

·appropriately reward stockholder returns in light of the level of risk that was taken to generate those returns to ensure that compensation decisions neither encourage nor reward excessive or inappropriate risk taking;

 

·support a culture committed to paying for performance where compensation is commensurate with the level of performance achieved; and

 

·maintain flexibility and discretion to allow us to recognize the unique characteristics of our operations and strategy, and our prevailing business environment, as well as changing employment market dynamics.

 

-26-

The Compensation Committee believes that it is important to create a compensation program that appropriately balances short-term, equity-based or cash-based compensation with long-term, equity-based compensation. Our named executive officer compensation program includes the following primary components:

 

·base salaries paid in cash which recognize the unique role and responsibilities of a position as well as an individual’s performance in that role;

 

·annual awards, which may be paid in cash or stock, which are meant to motivate and reward our short-term financial and operational performance, as well as individual performance; and

 

·long-term equity-based awards which are designed to support our objectives of aligning the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders, promoting our long-term performance and value creation, and retaining our named executive officers.

 

It is the Compensation Committee’s view that compensation decisions are complex and best made after a deliberate review of Company and individual performance, as well as industry compensation levels. Consistent with this view, the Compensation Committee generally assesses our performance within the context of the industry’s overall performance and our internal performance standards and evaluates individual performance orof our named executive officers relative to the performance expectations for their respective positions and roles within ourthe Company. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews our policies and compensation practices to determine whether the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. We have not identified any risks arising from our compensation policies and practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

 

-31-

The Compensation Committee consults with compensation consultants, outside counsel, and other advisors as appropriate, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, to assist in discharging its duties. Specifically, the Compensation Committee has engaged FTI as its independent compensation consultant to assist on a range of executive compensation matters. FTI’s services to the Compensation Committee are discussed further below.

 

Setting Executive Compensation.  The compensation arrangements with Stuart A. Tanz, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Richard A. Baker, the Chairman of our board of directors, were initially negotiated in October 2009.  In November 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with Richard K. Schoebel, our Chief Operating Officer.  Mr. Baker’s compensation arrangements were modified by a letter agreement dated April 2, 2012 in connection with his transition from Executive Chairman to non-executive Chairman of our board of directors.  In November 2012, we entered into an employment agreement with Michael B. Haines, our Chief Financial Officer. Subsequently, on March 21, 2017, we modified the terms of the employment agreements of each of Messrs. Tanz, Schoebel and Haines and entered into new employment agreements with such named executive officers.

 

The compensation arrangements with our existing executive management team were approved by the Compensation Committee, taking into consideration each individual’s value to ourthe Company, and in consultation with FTI and Clifford Chance US LLP, our outside counsel. The focus of the Compensation Committee in approving these employment and letter agreements was to (i) align our senior executive compensation programs and policies with our financial performance and, accordingly, the creation of stockholder value and (ii) see that the compensation terms of our executive management team reflected current practices in the marketplace. Information with respect to the current employment and letter agreements of our named executive officers can be found under “—Employment and Letter Agreements and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements.”

 

The Compensation Committee will, on an ongoing basis, continue to examine and assess our executive compensation practices relative to our compensation philosophy and objectives, as well as competitive market practices, and will make or recommend to our board of directors modifications to the compensation programs, as deemed appropriate. The Compensation Committee engaged FTI as its independent compensation consultant in respect of calendar year 20172020 to assist the Compensation Committee in developing and evaluating our executive compensation program, including objective performance standards for annual cash incentive bonuses and long-term equity-based awards.awards, and COVID-19 related adjustments to our 2020 compensation program. FTI’s services to us have been limited to compensation relatedcompensation-related services. FTI met with the Compensation Committee on several occasions in 20172020 and in the first quarter of 20182021 to discuss guiding principles, competitive market trends, peer group pay practices, compensation strategy and other compensation considerations, including our performance during 2017.2020. Specifically, FTI was engaged to assist the Compensation Committee in considering the framework for our named executive officers’ total compensation for 2017,2020, taking into account the base salaries specified in existing employment and letter agreements, the objective performance criteria and weighting levels originally established for annual cash incentive cash bonusesbonus awards and makinglong-term equity-based awards and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on such performance criteria and our compensation strategy, and to make recommendations relating to base salaries, annual cash incentive bonus awardsaward and long-term equity-based awards.

 

-27-

Executive Compensation Peer Group.

In evaluating the Company’s executive compensation program and financial performance for 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee reviewed our pay levels and performance compared to aan executive compensation peer group.Our executive compensation peer group (the “executive compensation peer group”) is comprised solely of publicly traded REITs that have the following characteristics:

 

·an investment focus concentrated on the retail real estate sector;

·compete with the Company for talent and/or investment opportunities; and

 

·range from approximately one-third to three times the Company’s implied equity market capitalization.

 

Our executive compensation peer group used to evaluate market compensation structures and levels comprised the following REITs:

 

Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR)CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (NYSE:CBL)
DDR Corp. (NYSE:DDR)Kite Realty Group Trust (NYSE:KRG)
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (NYSE:PEI)Ramco-Gershenson Property Trust (NYSE:RPT)
Retail Properties of America, Inc. (NYSE:RPAI)RPT Realty (NYSE:RPT)
Seritage Growth Properties (NYSE:SRG)SITE Centers Corp. (NYSE:SITC)
StoreSTORE Capital Corporation (NYSE:STOR)Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. (NYSE:SKT)
Urban Edge Properties (NYSE:UE)Washington Prime Group Inc. (NYSE:WPG)
Weingarten Realty Investors (NYSE:WRI) 

 

-32-

Factors Considered in Setting Executive Compensation.

The Compensation Committee considers Company and individual named executive officer performance as the most important factors in determining an executive’sa named executive officer’s compensation. With respect to its evaluation of Company performance, the Compensation Committee believes that an evaluation of our financial and operating performance provides an appropriate measure of Company performance in relation to our business objectives and for setting named executive officer compensation. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee utilizes certain objective criteria for evaluation of the Company’s and each named executive officer’s performance.  The objective metrics considered byperformance as established in our annual incentive compensation programs. In addition to the pre-established performance objectives (detailed in the “—Elements of Executive Compensation—Annual Cash Incentives” and “—Elements of Executive Compensation— Long-Term Equity-Based Awards” sections below), the Compensation Committee in respect of 2017 Company performance included:also considers:

 

·Funds from operations per shareother Company performance factors, including one, three, five and seven-year TSR, balance sheet management, execution of strategic plan and operational performance (including “Fiscal 2020 Performance Highlights” listed above);

 

·Asset growthcomparative benchmarking information;

 

·Absolute total return to stockholderscurrent compensation governance standards and guidelines;

 

·Relative total return to stockholdersindividual performance evaluations; and

 

·Capital raising

·Dividend growth

·Year-end leased occupancy

·Same store net operating income growthrelative value provided by each of our named executive officers towards our success in 2020.

 

The Compensation Committee selected each

Impact of the above operating metrics because they believe that these metrics are the critical drivers of overall fundamental performance that will over time leadCOVID-19 Pandemic

In February 2020, just prior to the creationonset of sustainable stockholder value.  In addition to these operating metrics,the COVID-19 pandemic, the Compensation Committee considered additional role-specificapproved objective criteriaperformance metrics for the 2020 annual cash incentive bonus program. In March 2020, in evaluatinglight of the rapid development, fluidity and uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the Company’s business, our board of directors approved a resolution authorizing the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, to dispose of the objective performance metrics approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2020 and to instead authorize the grant of annual cash incentive bonuses and long-term equity-based awards based on an assessment of the performance and compensation of Mr. Haines, our Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Schoebel, our Chief Operating Officer. See “—Annual Cash Incentives.”

We believe that the operating metrics described above may not necessarily reflect the totality of the challenges faced, and the goals accomplished, by ourCompany’s senior management team in 2017steering the Company through the COVID-19 crisis, in continuingpositioning the Company for the next phase in its business life after the country emerges from the crisis and other factors to grow our Company, our balance sheetbe determined by the Compensation Committee.

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States in March 2020 had a sudden and significant impact on the global economy, the U.S. economy, the economies of the local markets throughout the west coast in which the Company’s properties are located, and the broader financial markets. The pandemic, and the preventative measures taken by local, state and federal authorities to alleviate the public health crisis including mandatory business closures, quarantines, restrictions on travel, restrictions on gatherings and social distancing practices, have severely impacted the U.S. retail market, the operations of the Company’s tenants and the Company’s operations.

In response to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s management and our investor base.  In particular, comparisonsboard of these metrics against those of our executive compensation peer group tenddirectors significantly changed the Company’s near-term strategy to understate our management team’s performance, given that manyfocus on, among other things, protecting the health and safety of the companiesCompany’s employees and tenants (as well as their customers), working with and supporting tenants to manage delinquencies and remain open for business and bolstering the Company’s liquidity position. The onset of the pandemic, and the Company’s shift in our executive compensation peer group are fully-mature companies with much longer operating histories.  As a consequence,near-term strategy in additionresponse to these objective metrics,the COVID-19 pandemic, occurred after the Compensation Committee also tookhad approved the objective performance metrics for the 2020 annual cash incentive bonus program and, as a result, such performance metrics did not take into account among others, the following additional factors: diversificationimpacts of our investor base, investor relations activities,the COVID-19 pandemic or the change in the Company’s near-term strategy.

The Company’s financial results for the year ended December 31, 2020 were significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, including reductions in property operating income and non-GAAP performance measures from changes in projected uncollectible rental revenue, reductions in occupancy and reductions in rental revenue resulting from rent deferrals and lease concessions. While the Company continued to make progress on the objective performance metrics underpinning the 2020 annual cash incentive bonus program as originally contemplated, with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, overall performance was generally below the “threshold” level required for payout under such metrics.

In February 2021, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with FTI, determined that the formulaic 2020 annual cash incentive award program that was established prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the maintenance of an investment grade ratingresulting incentive bonus amounts for our senior unsecured debt.named executive officers that would have been generated thereunder, would not achieve the annual cash incentive bonus program’s goals of motivating and retaining key executives. As a result, the Compensation Committee, as previously authorized by our board of directors, determined it was appropriate to dispose of the performance metrics established by the Compensation Committee in February 2020 and to instead exercise its discretion in awarding annual cash incentive bonuses to our named executive officers for the 2020 performance year.

 

 -28--33- 

 

TheBased on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of (i) management’s handling of the COVID-19 crisis during 2020, and (ii) the Company’s performance against its revised strategic priorities during 2020, as further described below, the Compensation Committee also reviews individual performance evaluations conducted by each named executive officer.  The Compensation Committee also considered the relative value provided by each ofawarded annual bonuses to our named executive officers towards our success in 2017, including Mr. Tanz’samounts that represented between approximately 90% and Mr. Haines’s contribution100% of the “target” bonus levels that would have been earned under the 2020 annual cash incentive bonus program as originally established prior to the achievementCOVID-19 pandemic. These awards represented decreases of approximately 10% from the 2019 annual cash incentive bonus program awards to our financial goals, Mr. Schoebel’s contribution with respect tonamed executive officers.

More details regarding these payments and the properties we acquired during 2017 and Mr. Baker’s contribution tofactors that the achievementCompensation Committee considered can be found below under “—Elements of our overall business goals during 2017.Executive Compensation—Annual Cash Incentives.”

 

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions.

The Compensation Committee implements all compensation decisions related to our named executive officers and approves recommendations related to incentive compensation for our other employees. When implementing compensation for our named executive officers (other than Mr. Tanz), the Compensation Committee seeks and considers the advice and counsel of Mr. Tanz, our Chief Executive Officer, given his direct day-to-day working relationship with these senior executives, and Mr. Baker, the Chairman of our board of directors.

 

Elements of Executive Compensation.

The key elements of our executive compensation program include:

 

·base salary;

 

·annual cash incentives;incentive bonuses;

 

·long-term equity-based awards; and

 

·perquisites and other benefits.

 

Base Salary

 

Pursuant to their employment and letter agreements, we provide our named executive officers with annual base salaries to compensate them for services provided during the term of their employment or service. The Compensation Committee believes that the annual base salary paid in 20172020 to each of our named executive officers reflected the scope of the role and responsibilities of the applicable position, individual performance and experience, and competitive market practices.

 

The annual base salaries for each of our named executive officers at December 31, 20172020 were as follows:

 

Executive 2017 Base Salary 2020 Base Salary
Stuart A. Tanz $850,000  $875,000 
Michael B. Haines  331,000   395,000 
Richard A. Baker  275,000   275,000 
Richard K. Schoebel  390,000   470,000 

 

Pursuant to their employment and letter agreements, the amount of annual compensation paid to each of our named executive officers may be increased during the term of employment at the discretion of our board of directors. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee annually reviews the amount of the annual base salary paid to our named executive officers each year, based upon individual roles and performance and the overall financial and operating performance of ourthe Company, and may provide for increases as it may, in its discretion, deem appropriate. The Compensation Committee approved increases in the base salaries of Messrs. Haines and Schoebel of $25,000 and $30,000, respectively, for 2018. ChangesThere were no changes made to the base salaries of our named executive officers for 2018 are as follows:2021.

 

Executive 2017
Base Salary		 2018
Base Salary		 % Change 2021 Base Salary 2020 Base Salary % Change
Stuart A. Tanz $850,000  $850,000   –  $875,000  $875,000   — 
Michael B. Haines  331,000   356,000   7.6%  395,000   395,000   — 
Richard A. Baker  275,000   275,000   –   275,000   275,000   — 
Richard K. Schoebel  390,000   420,000   7.7%  470,000   470,000   — 

 

-34-

Our board of directors intends to continue to implement the terms of the employment or letter agreements, including the annual base salary provisions, and remains open to future annual base salary adjustments in the event our board of directors concludes that the circumstances warrant them. However, consistent with the Compensation Committee’s overall philosophy, we intend that the compensation programs for our named executive officers will emphasize incentive compensation in the form of annual cash incentive bonuses and long-term equity basedequity-based awards.

 

-29-

Annual Cash Incentives

 

Under the terms of their employment or letter agreements, an incentive structure was established for our named executive officers, making them eligible to receive an annual bonuscash incentive within a specified range expressed as a percentage of such named executive officer’s annual salary. The range specified for each of our named executive officers is disclosed under “—Employment and Letter Agreements and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements.”

 

In 2017, 85%February 2020, just prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Compensation Committee approved objective performance metrics for the 2020 annual cash incentive bonus program (the “Initial 2020 Program”). In March 2020, in light of the rapid development, fluidity and uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the Company’s business, our board of directors approved a resolution authorizing the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, to dispose of the objective performance metrics approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2020 and to instead authorize the grant of annual cash incentive bonuses and long-term equity-based awards based on an assessment of the performance of the Company’s senior management team in steering the Company through the COVID-19 crisis, in positioning the Company for the next phase in its business life after the country emerges from the crisis and other factors to be determined by the Compensation Committee.

Initial 2020 Program

Pursuant to the Initial 2020 Program, 80% of the annual cash incentive cash bonus opportunities for our named executive officersMr. Tanz were based on the achievement of certain objective Company performance criteria and, in the case of Messrs. Haines and Schoebel, 85% of the annual cash incentive bonus opportunities were based on the achievement of such objective performance criteria as well as certain role-specific objective criteria. In addition, the plan for 2017Initial 2020 Program also contained a discretionary component with a weighting of 20% for Mr. Tanz and 15%, for each of Messrs. Haines and Schoebel, which was determined by the Compensation Committee. For the 2018 performance year, we have increased the portion of Mr. Tanz’s annual incentive cash bonus opportunity that is based solely on the achievement of objective performance criteria to 90%.

 

The following table shows the objective metrics and weightings of the 2017 annual incentive cash bonus opportunitiesInitial 2020 Program for our named executive officers:

 

       2017 Annual Incentive Targets       Initial 2020 Program Bonus Targets
Performance Criteria Weighting for
Stuart A. Tanz		 Weighting for
Michael B. Haines		 Weighting for
Richard K. Schoebel		 Threshold Target Maximum Actual Weighting for Stuart A. Tanz Weighting for Michael B. Haines Weighting for Richard K. Schoebel Threshold Target Maximum Actual
FFO per share (diluted)(1)  20%  15%  15% $1.08  $1.10  $1.12  $1.14   20%  15%  15% $1.06  $1.08  $1.10  $1.05 
Asset growth  5%  3.75%  3.75%  $150 million   $250 million   $350 million   $357.6 million 
Absolute total return to stockholders  7.5%  5.625%  5.625%  4%  5%  6%  -2.0%
Relative total return to stockholders(2)  7.5%  5.625%  5.625%  50th percentile   60th percentile   70th percentile   81.3 percentile 
Capital raising  10%  7.5%  7.5%  $100 million   $150 million   $200 million   $408.8 million   20%  15%  15%  $50 million   $75 million   $100 million   — 
Dividend growth  15%  11.25%  11.25%  2% increase   3% increase   4% increase   4.2%
Year-end lease occupancy(3)  10%  7.5%  7.5%  95%  96%  97%  97.4%
Same Store NOI growth(4)  10%  7.5%  7.5%  2.0% increase   2.5% increase   3.0% increase   3.1%
Year-end leased occupancy(2)  20%  15%  15%  94%  95%  96%  96.8%
Same-center NOI growth(3)  20%  15%  15%  1.0% increase   1.5% increase   2.0% increase   4.6% decrease 
Discretionary  15%  11.25%  11.25%  N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   20%  15%  15%  N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Role specific criteria  0%  25%(5)  25%(5)  N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   0%  25%(4)  25%(4)  N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Total  100%  100%  100%  N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   100%  100%  100%  N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 

_______________

_____________________________

(1)FFO is a widely recognized non-GAAP financial measure for REITs that we believe, when considered with financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, provides additional and useful means to assess our financial performance. We define FFO and provide a reconciliation of actual FFO for the year ended December 31, 20172020 to net income applicable to stockholders in accordance with GAAP, in Item 7 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.

 

(2)See “—Peer Group” for the REITs comprising the peer group against which relative total stockholder return was measured.

(3)Year-end leased occupancy excludes acquisitions in the last six months of 2017.2020.

 

(4)(3)Represents the percentage increase in cash NOI (calculated as operating revenues (base rent and recoveries from tenants), less property and related expenses (property operating expenses and property taxes), adjusted for non-cash revenue and operating expense items such as straight-line rent and amortization of lease intangibles, debt-related expenses, and other adjustments) for those properties owned by us for the entirety of 20172020 and 2016.  Cash2019. Same-center NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe, when considered with financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, provides additional and useful means to evaluate and compare the operating performance of the Company’s properties. We provide a reconciliation of same-center cash NOI to consolidated operating income in accordance with GAAP for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, in Item 7 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.

 

(5)(4)Described in greater detail below.

 

The operating metrics set under our executive compensation program are used for that limited purpose and should not be understood to be statements of management’s expectations of our future results or other guidance. Investors should not apply these metrics in any other context.

 

-35-

In addition to the Company performance criteria described above, the Initial 2020 Program for Mr. Haines’s and Mr. Schoebel’s cash bonuses for 2017 were also based in part onincluded additional role-specific objective criteria. In the case of Mr. Haines, these criteria and their weighting levels included:

 

·integration of acquired properties / divestiture of sold properties (5%),

 

·expansion of infrastructure as required by asset growth and mentoring of current staffcapital markets management (5%),

 

-30-

·implementation of positive pay for cash disbursementscybersecurity assessment management (5%),

 

·maintain public and internal accounting controls in accordance with PCAOB and auditor standards (5%), and

 

·the timely completion of the budget, CAM reconciliationcommon area maintenance (“CAM”) reconciliations and periodic tenant billings (5%).

 

In the case of Mr. Schoebel, the role-specific objective criteria and weighting levels included:

 

·capital and environmental projectprojects management (5%),

 

·same-space re-leasing spreads (5%),

 

·tenant retention rate (5%),

 

·achievement of budget assumptions as they related to leasing/delivery and rent commencementcybersecurity assessment management (5%), and

 

·the timely completion of the budget, CAM reconciliationreconciliations and periodic tenant billings (5%).

The Compensation Committee determined that the additional role-specific objective criteria for each of Messrs. Haines and Schoebel were achieved in 2017.

In addition to the Company and role-specific objective criteria described above, a discretionary component was evaluated by the Compensation Committee. In evaluating the discretionary component, the Compensation Committee focused on the achievement of the objective measures described above, as well additional factors such as, among others, the diversification of our investor base, investor relations activities, the maintenance of an investment grade rating for our senior unsecured debt, individual performance evaluations and the relative value provided by each of our named executive officers towards our success in 2017.

 

The following table shows the threshold, target and maximum annual cash incentive cash bonus opportunities that were available to each named executive officer for 2017under the Initial 2020 Program as a percentage of their base salary, assalary.

  Initial 2020 Program Payout Levels as a Percentage of Base Salary
Executive Threshold Target Maximum
Stuart A. Tanz  75%  125%  175%
Michael B. Haines  75%  100%  125%
Richard K. Schoebel  75%  100%  125%

Revised 2020 Cash Bonuses

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States in March 2020 had a sudden and significant impact on the global economy, the U.S. economy, the economies of the local markets throughout the west coast in which the Company’s properties are located, and the broader financial markets. The pandemic, and the preventative measures taken by local, state and federal authorities to alleviate the public health crisis including mandatory business closures, quarantines, restrictions on travel, restrictions on gatherings and social distancing practices, have severely impacted the U.S. retail market, the operations of the Company’s tenants and the Company’s operations.

In response to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s management and our board of directors significantly changed the Company’s near-term strategy to focus on, among other things, protecting the health and safety of the Company’s employees and tenants (as well as their customers), working with and supporting tenants to manage delinquencies and remain open for business and bolstering the actual bonus earnedCompany’s liquidity position. The onset of the pandemic, and the Company’s shift in near-term strategy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, occurred after the Compensation Committee had approved the objective performance metrics for the Initial 2020 Program and, as a result, such performance metrics did not take into account the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic or the change in the Company’s near-term strategy.

The Company’s financial results for the year ended December 31, 2017.  Whether any2020 were significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, including reductions in property operating income and non-GAAP performance measures from changes in projected uncollectible rental revenue, reductions in occupancy and reductions in rental revenue resulting from rent deferrals and lease concessions. While the Company continued to make progress on the objective performance metrics underpinning the Initial 2020 Program, with the impact of the threshold, target or maximumCOVID-19 pandemic, overall performance was generally below the “threshold” level required for payout under such metrics.

In February 2021, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with FTI, determined that the Initial 2020 Program that was established prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the resulting incentive bonus levels were attainedamounts for our named executive officers that would have been generated thereunder, would not achieve the annual cash incentive bonus program’s goals of motivating and retaining key executives. As a result, the Compensation Committee, as previously authorized by our board of directors, determined it was determinedappropriate to dispose of the performance metrics established by the Compensation Committee basedin February 2020 and to instead exercise its discretion in awarding annual cash incentive bonuses to our named executive officers for the 2020 performance year.

-36-

Based on achievementthe Compensation Committee’s assessment of (i) management’s handling of the criteriaCOVID-19 crisis during 2020, and (ii) the Company’s performance against its revised strategic priorities during 2020, as further described above,below, the Compensation Committee awarded annual bonuses to our named executive officers in amounts that represented between approximately 90% and 100% of the “target” bonus levels that would have been earned under the Initial 2020 Program as originally established prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. These awards represented decreases of approximately 10% from the 2019 annual cash incentive bonus program awards to our named executive officers.

Handling of the COVID-19 Crisis

Throughout the disruption caused by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, our named executive officers responded to the unprecedented challenges facing the Company quickly and effectively. The Compensation Committee considered such actions taken during 2020 in awarding annual cash bonuses to our named executive officers including the discretionary component,following:

·Safety: Established new safety protocols and procedures at all of our properties, including increasing cleaning protocols, addressing the protection of tenants during cleaning, establishing physical distancing procedures, requiring facial coverings, providing personal protective equipment and cleaning supplies for employees who needed to be onsite, and adding an ultraviolet system to all HVAC units at our offices.

·Employees: Asked all employees to begin working from home beginning March 16th, 2020 and following health and safety stay-at-home orders per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.

·Tenants: Commenced rent deferment discussions with our tenants and assisted tenants in identifying local, state and federal resources that may be available to support their businesses and employees during the pandemic, including stimulus funds that may be available under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 or additional stimulus or relief packages implemented by local, state or federal governments. Additionally, in order to assist our tenants in remaining open and operating, we offered aid to expand outdoor operations (in accordance with state guidelines), utilizing shaded and broad sidewalk areas, existing courtyard space, and converting lawn and parking stalls into private, umbrellaed spaces for tenants to operate all while procuring key items needed to create outdoor usable spaces for tenants, including umbrellas, partitions, space heaters and wind barriers.

·Operations: Successfully executed our business continuity plan with no disruption to our core financial, operational and IT systems.

·Liquidity: Successfully managed the Company’s liquidity and maintained financial flexibility by borrowing $130.0 million under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility during March and April of 2020 (which was later repaid) and temporarily suspended quarterly dividend distributions.

Company Performance

The Compensation Committee also considered the Company’s performance against its strategic priorities during 2020 in awarding annual cash bonuses to our named executive officers including the following:

·$32.0 million of net income attributable to common stockholders ($0.27 per diluted share);

·$132.5 million in FFO;

·90.6% of total billed base rent during pandemic has been paid as of February 18, 2021 (2Q’20 - 4Q’20), among the highest versus our performance comparison peer group;

·96.8% of our gross leasable area (including 100% of anchor space) was leased at December 31, 2020, the 8th consecutive year above 96.0%;

·1.2 million square feet of leases were executed, representing the 10th consecutive year of leasing approximately double the square footage originally scheduled to expire;

·achieved growth in same-space cash rents on new leases of 12.5% and 7.9% growth on renewals;

-37-

·awarded investment grade rating and stable outlook from Fitch Ratings, Inc.;

·96.5% of our total outstanding indebtedness was effectively fixed-rate at year-end, a record for the Company, and 94.5% of our gross leasable area was unencumbered at December 31, 2020;

·maintained 3.4x interest coverage;

·reduced outstanding debt by $36.6 million;

·advanced the densification entitlement process at Crossroads Shopping Center, The Village at Novato, and Pinole Vista Shopping Center;

·established a comprehensive Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) program (achieved a number of milestones ahead of Company’s 3-year goal); and

·awarded Best Retail REIT (U.S.) 2020 by CFI.co (London-based financial news organization) in recognition of management’s strategic vision, long-term success, corporate culture and ESG-focused initiatives.

The table below shows the actual 2019 annual cash incentive bonus awards, the 2020 target awards under the initial 2020 program, and the weighting of each criterion.actual 2020 bonus award payouts for our named executive officers:

 

 2017 Incentive Cash Bonus Percentage Levels Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Awards
Executive Threshold Target Maximum Actual ($) Actual as a Percentage of Base Salary Actual 2019 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Award ($) Target 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Award ($) Actual 2020 Bonus Award ($)
Stuart A. Tanz  75%  125%  175%  1,375,938   162%  1,225,000   1,093,750   1,093,750 
Michael B. Haines  75%  100%  125%  390,477   118%  398,438   395,000   355,800 
Richard K. Schoebel  75%  100%  125%  460,078   118%  472,813   470,000   423,500 

 

The Compensation Committee’s evaluation of Mr. Baker’s performance during 20172020 focused on his contribution to the achievement of our overall business goals during 20172020 and other factors as described above under “—Factors Considered.Setting Executive Compensation.” In addition, theThe Compensation Committee also considered, in consultation with FTI, the compensation practices of our executive compensation peer group and recommended a bonus of $200,000$180,000 for Mr. Baker in respect of the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.

 

Equity Grants2021 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Program

In February 2021, the Compensation Committee approved specific performance metrics relating to the annual cash incentive bonus program for our named executive officers for the performance year ending December 31, 2021. The specific performance metrics and weightings approved at this meeting are as follows:

  2021 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Performance Criteria Weightings
Performance Criteria Weighting for
Stuart A. Tanz		 Weighting for
Michael B. Haines		 Weighting for
Richard K. Schoebel
FFO per share (diluted)  20%  15%  15%
Capital raising  20%  15%  15%
Year-end leased occupancy  20%  15%  15%
Same-center NOI growth  20%  15%  15%
Discretionary  20%  15%  15%
Role specific criteria  0%  25%  25%
Total  100%  100%  100%

Long-Term Equity-Based Awards

 

The Compensation Committee believes that equity-based incentives are an effective means of motivating and rewarding long-term Company performance and value creation. In addition, equity-based incentives appropriately align the interests of management with those of stockholders. During the fourth quarter of 2009, we adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, as approved by our stockholders.  In accordance with the terms of the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, employees, non-employee directors, executive officers and other key personnel and our service providers and any of our subsidiaries are eligible to be granted Options, Restricted Shares, LTIP units, share appreciation rights, phantom shares, dividend equivalents and other equity-based awards under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. These equity-based awards willare intended to be designed to link executive compensation to our long-term Common Stock performance.performance as well as the achievement of operational goals.

 

 -31--38- 

 

In February 2016,2019, the Compensation Committee, based on a comprehensive review of our performance-based equity compensation program, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with FTI, introduced modificationsrestructured such equity compensation to performance-based equity awards as compared to prior performance-based equity awards. The Compensation Committee determined that performance-based equity awards requiredemphasize the achievement of overall market-based performance measures, including absolute TSRfinancial and TSR relativeoperational metrics that were better aligned with the Company’s long-term strategic goals and more directly correlated to a peer group, measured over a cumulative three-year period. In addition, as described below, the awards incorporate levels of opportunity – “threshold,” “target” and “maximum” – which determine the amount of awards that will earned by our named executive officers.

performance. With respect to the Restricted Shares awardedequity awards granted to Messrs. Tanz, Haines, Schoebel and Baker in respect of 2017 performance for the year ended December 31, 2019 (granted in 2018)2020), the Compensation Committee retained this revised structure but incorporated the achievement of ESG milestones into the vesting criteria for the performance-based equity awards, as follows:

·Allocation of Awards: Year-end equity-based awards are allocated 50% to time-based equity awards that vest based on continued employment or service over a three-year vesting period and 50% to performance-based equity awards that remain at risk and are subject to forfeiture subject to the achievement pre-established metrics over a three-year performance period.

·Performance-Based Vesting Criteria: Metrics for performance-based equity awards would be adjusted to consist of the number of ESG milestones achieved, average year-end occupancy, average same-center NOI growth and TSR relative to a performance comparison peer group listed below under “—Performance Peer Group”, each measured over a cumulative three-year period (each weighted 25%).

·Payout Opportunities: The performance-based equity awards of our named executive officers would incorporate four levels of opportunity – “threshold,” “target,” “high” and “exceptional” – which determine the amount of the performance-based equity awards that will be earned.

Throughout 2020 and during the first quarter of 2021, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with FTI, continued to evaluate the Company’s performance-based equity award structure together with the Company’s long-term strategic goals. The Compensation Committee determined the performance measures, weightings and levels of opportunity would remain the same for the performance-based equity awards in respect of performance for the year ended December 31, 2020 (granted in 2021). The Compensation Committee believes that the performance goals for the year-end 2020 performance-based equity awards (granted in 2021) are aligned with the Company’s strategic business plan, directly correlated to executive performance, continue to be sensitive to the Company’s TSR performance and are consistent with the long-term objectives that have been communicated to the Company’s investors.

Year-End 2020 Long-Term Equity-Based Awards (Granted in 2021)

In February 2021, the Compensation Committee approved long-term equity-based awards for our named executive officers in respect of performance for the year ended December 31, 2020, including the specific performance metrics, weightings and levels of opportunity for performance-based equity awards as described below. In determining the long-term equity-based awards to our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee focused on the objective measures and other factors as described above under “—Setting Executive Compensation.” Based upon these considerations, the Compensation Committee recommended long-term equity-based awards as follows in respect of performance for the year ended December 31, 2020, subject to the forward-looking vesting criteria described herein:

Executive Restricted Shares Awarded (#)(1) Value based on Grant Date Closing Price ($)
Stuart A. Tanz  231,338   3,749,989 
Michael B. Haines  70,326   1,139,984 
Richard A. Baker  24,676   399,998 
Richard K. Schoebel  77,112   1,249,986 

_______________________

(1)Granted on February 23, 2021, 50% of the shares awarded are time-based Restricted Share awards and 50% of the shares awarded are performance-based Restricted Share awards. The number of performance-based Restricted Shares included in this amount reflects vesting at a “target” payout percentage as shown in the table under “Key Terms of the Year-End 2020 Performance-Based Equity Awards (Granted in 2021).”

Key Terms of the Year-End 2020 Performance-Based Equity Awards (Granted in 2021)

With respect to the long-term equity-based awards to Messrs. Tanz, Haines, Schoebel and Baker in respect of performance for the year ended December 31, 2020 (granted in 2021), 50% of such awards were time-based Restricted Share awards that vest based solely on continued employment or service over a three-year vesting period. Dividends are paid on all time-based equity awards, vested and non-vested.

-39-

The remaining 50% of such long-term equity-based awards remain at risk and are subject to forfeiture through December 2020, subject to the achievement of absolute and relative TSR for the three-year forward-looking performance period ending December 31, 2020.

Thewere performance-based Restricted Share awards granted for 2017 performance were allocated 65% to awards that vest based on our absolute TSR for the three-year forward-looking period endingyear ended December 31, 2020 and 35% to awards thatwere allocated as follows: (i) 25% of the award will vest based on the number of ESG milestones achieved over the performance period, (ii) 25% of the award will vest based on average year-end occupancy rates over the performance period, (iii) 25% of the award will vest based on average year-end same-center NOI growth over the performance period, and (iv) 25% of the award will vest based on our TSR for such three-year forward-looking performance period relative to the performance comparison peer group described below.listed under “—Performance Peer Group.” Dividends payable in connection with performance-based equity awards granted for 2017 performance for the year ended December 31, 2020 will only be paid to the extent that the performance-based vesting conditions are satisfied and such awards are earned and vest. The Compensation Committee believes that that above allocation is appropriate given that stockholder wealth creation is ultimately tied to absolute returns, while also being sensitive to relative TSR performance. The performance criteria, weightings and levels of opportunity for each of Messrs. Tanz, Haines, Baker and Schoebel for the performance-based equity awards, which were approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2021, are as follows:

 

  

Three Year Absolute TSR(1)(3)

 

Three Year Relative TSR(2)(3)

  18% TSR 24% TSR 30% TSR 

40th Percentile

 

55th Percentile

 

70th Percentile

Executive Percent of Award Earned Percent of Award Earned
Stuart A. Tanz  50%  100%  150%  50%  100%  150%
Michael B. Haines  50%  100%  150%  50%  100%  150%
Richard K. Schoebel  50%  100%  150%  50%  100%  150%
Richard A. Baker  50%  100%  150%  50%  100%  150%
Performance Measure Weighting Threshold Target High Exceptional
ESG Milestones Achieved(1)  25%  2   3   4   6 
Average Year-End Occupancy(2)  25%  92%  94%  96%  97%
Average Year-End Same-Center NOI Growth(3)  25%  1.5%  2.0%  2.5%  3.5%
Three Year Relative TSR(4)  25%  30th percentile   40th percentile   50th percentile   70th percentile 
Payout Percentage:  50%  100%  150%  200%

_______________

_____________________

(1)ESG milestones achieved shall be the sum of the number of goals related to our ESG program as determined by our board of directors achieved during the period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023 (the “2021 Grant Performance Period”). In the event the Absolute TSRESG milestones achieved fall between 4 and 6, the ESG milestones achieved vesting percentage will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 150.0% and 200.0%.

(2)In the event average year-end occupancy falls between 18.0%92% and 24.0%94%, average year-end occupancy vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 50.0% and 100.0%, in the Absoluteevent average year-end occupancy falls between 94% and 96%, average year-end occupancy vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 100.0% and 150.0%, and in the event average year-end occupancy falls between 96% and 97%, average year-end occupancy vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 150.0% and 200.0%. The occupancy measurement at December 31 of each year during the 2021 Grant Performance Period excludes any properties acquired during the last six months of such year and properties that are being prepared for densification as of the respective measurement date.

(3)In the event average same-center NOI growth falls between 1.5% and 2.0%, average same-center NOI growth vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 50.0% and 100.0%, in the event average same-center NOI growth falls between 2.0% and 2.5%, average same-center NOI growth vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 100.0% and 150.0%, and in the event average same-center NOI growth falls between 2.5% and 3.5%, average same-center NOI growth vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 150.0% and 200.0%. Same-center NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe, when considered with financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, provides additional and useful means to evaluate and compare the operating performance of the Company’s properties. We provide a reconciliation of same-center NOI to consolidated operating income in accordance with GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, in Item 7 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

(4)In the event the Relative TSR percentile falls between the 30th percentile and the 40th percentile, Relative TSR vesting percentage is determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 50.0% and 100.0% and, in the event that the AbsoluteRelative TSR percentagepercentile falls between 24.0%the 40th percentile and 30.0%, Absolute50th percentile, the Relative TSR vesting percentage isshall be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 100.0% and 150.0%, and in the event that the Relative TSR percentile falls between the 50th percentile and 70th percentile, the Relative TSR vesting percentage shall be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 150.0% and 200.0%.

Key Terms of the Year-End 2019 Performance-Based Equity Awards (Granted in 2020)

With respect to the long-term equity-based awards to Messrs. Tanz, Haines, Schoebel and Baker in respect of performance for the year ended December 31, 2019 (granted in 2020), 50% of such awards were time-based Restricted Share awards that vest based solely on continued employment or service over a three-year vesting period. Dividends are paid on all time-based equity awards, vested and non-vested.

The remaining 50% of such long-term equity-based awards were performance-based Restricted Share awards granted for performance for the year ended December 31, 2019 and were allocated as follows: (i) 25% of the award will vest based on the number of ESG milestones achieved over the performance period, (ii) 25% of the award will vest based on average year-end occupancy rates over the performance period, (iii) 25% of the award will vest based on average year-end same-center NOI growth over the performance period, and (iv) 25% of the award will vest based on our TSR for such three-year forward-looking performance period relative to the performance comparison peer group listed under “—Performance Peer Group.” Dividends payable in connection with performance-based equity awards granted for performance for the year ended December 31, 2019 will only be paid to the extent that the performance-based vesting conditions are satisfied and such awards are earned and vest. The performance criteria, weightings and levels of opportunity for each of Messrs. Tanz, Haines, Baker and Schoebel for the performance-based equity awards, which were approved by the Compensation Committee at its meeting held on February 18, 2020, are as follows:

-40-

Performance Measure Weighting Threshold Target High Exceptional
ESG Milestones Achieved(1)  25%  2   3   4   6 
Average Year-End Occupancy(2)  25%  92%  94%  96%  98%
Average Year-End Same-Center NOI Growth(3)  25%  1.5%  2.0%  2.5%  3.5%
Three Year Relative TSR(4)  25%  40th percentile   55th percentile   70th percentile   80th percentile 
Payout Percentage:  50%  100%  150%  200%

______________________

(1)ESG milestones achieved shall be the sum of the number of goals related to our ESG program as determined by our board of directors achieved during the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 (the “2020 Grant Performance Period”). In the event the ESG milestones achieved fall between 4 and 6, the ESG milestones achieved vesting percentage will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 150.0% and 200.0%.

 

(2)In the event average year-end occupancy falls between 92% and 94%, average year-end occupancy vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 50.0% and 100.0%, in the event average year-end occupancy falls between 94% and 96%, average year-end occupancy vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 100.0% and 150.0%, and in the event average year-end occupancy falls between 96% and 98%, average year-end occupancy vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 150.0% and 200.0%. The occupancy measurement at December 31 of each year during the 2020 Grant Performance Period excludes any properties acquired during the last six months of such year and properties that are being prepared for densification as of the respective measurement date.

(3)In the event average same-center NOI growth falls between 1.5% and 2.0%, average same-center NOI growth vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 50.0% and 100.0%, in the event average same-center NOI growth falls between 2.0% and 2.5%, average same-center NOI growth vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 100.0% and 150.0%, and in the event average same-center NOI growth falls between 2.5% and 3.5%, average same-center NOI growth vesting will be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 150.0% and 200.0%. Same-center NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe, when considered with financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, provides additional and useful means to evaluate and compare the operating performance of the Company’s properties. We provide a reconciliation of same-center NOI to consolidated operating income in accordance with GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, in Item 7 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

(4)In the event the Relative TSR percentile falls between the 40th percentile and the 55th percentile, Relative TSR vesting percentage is determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 50.0% and 100.0% and, in the event that the Relative TSR percentile falls between the 55th percentile and 70th percentile, the Relative TSR vesting percentage shall be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 100.0% and 150.0%.

(3)The awards are allocated 65% to awards, and in the event that vest based on Absolute TSR performance and 35% that vest based onthe Relative TSR performance.percentile falls between the 70th percentile and 80th percentile, the Relative TSR vesting percentage shall be determined using a straight line linear interpolation between 150.0% and 200.0%.

 

Performance Peer Group

In connection with the vesting of performance-based equity awards subject to relative TSR performance goals, the Company uses a group of competitors that are most closely aligned from an investment and asset-type perspective, but may be too large or small from a size perspective to be considered appropriate peers from an executive compensation standpoint. The performance comparisonfollowing group of peer groupcompanies is used to calculated the Relativemeasure our relative TSR vesting percentage include the companies listed below. The below peer group varies fromperformance for our executive compensation peer group due to the fact that the performance comparison peer group is more closely aligned with the underlying assets owned by each company, while the executive compensation peer group is more sensitive to the size of each company.outstanding performance-based equity awards:

 

Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR)Brixmor Property Group Inc. (NYSE:BRX)
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (NYSE:CBL)Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE:CDR)
DDR Corp. (NYSE:DDR)Federal Realty Investment Trust (NYSE:FRT)
Kimco Realty Corporation (NYSE:KIM)
Kite Realty Group Trust (NYSE:KRG)
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (NYSE:PEI)Ramco-Gershenson Property Trust (NYSE:RPT)
Regency Centers Corporation (NYSE:REG)Retail Properties of America, Inc. (NYSE:RPAI)
RPT Realty (NYSE:RPT)SITE Centers Corp. (NYSE:SITC)
Urban Edge Properties (NYSE:UE)Weingarten Realty Investors (NYSE:WRI)
Washington Prime Group Inc. (NYSE:WPG)
Weingarten Realty Investors (NYSE:WRI) 

 

In determiningCompensation for our Chairman

Mr. Baker, the equity grantsChairman of our board of directors, does not hold any executive office with the Company. However, due to our namedthe nature of his letter agreement and the compensation he is entitled to thereunder, we include Mr. Baker in this Proxy Statement as a “named executive officersofficer.” The Board’s determination of compensation for Mr. Baker recognizes his importance to the Company and its business given his unique experience and leadership capabilities. Mr. Baker brings to the Company a distinguished reputation, valuable retail and real estate relationships and contacts, and significant experience in respecta number of 2017,critical areas, including real estate, finance, leasing and strategy. Mr. Baker also has regular interactions with the Compensation Committee focused on the objective measuresCompany’s executive management team regarding retail industry trends, strategic acquisitions and other high-level matters. Based on those factors as described above under “—Factors Considered.”  Based upon these considerations, the Compensation Committee recommended equity awards as follows in respectand a review of performancecompensation paid to other similar chairpersons in the year 2017, subject toREIT industry, the forward-looking vesting criteria described above:Board believes that Mr. Baker’s compensation is appropriate and is as follows:

 

 -32--41- 

 

Executive Shares Awarded Value based on
Grant Date
Closing Price
Stuart A. Tanz  203,044  $3,599,910 
Michael B. Haines  64,296   1,139,968 
Richard A. Baker  22,560   399,989 
Richard K. Schoebel  70,500   1.249,965 
Element 2020 2019 % Change
Base Salary $275,000  $275,000   —% 
Cash Bonus  180,000   200,000   (10.0%)
Equity Awards  399,998(1)  399,990(2)  —% 
Total $854,998  $874,990   (2.3)%

_________________________

(1)Represents the value of the award based on the closing price of the Common Stock reported on NASDAQ on February 23, 2021, the grant date of the award.

 

As of December 31, 2017, our named executive officers held an aggregate of 561,643 unvested Restricted Shares and 245,000 Options.

(2)Represents the value of the award based on the closing price of the Common Stock reported on NASDAQ on February 18, 2020, the grant date of the award.

 

Perquisites and Other Benefits

 

In general, it is the Compensation Committee’s practice to provide limited perquisites and other benefits to our named executive officers. We provide each of Messrs. Tanz, Haines and Schoebel with an automobile allowance of $1,500 per month and Mr. Haines with an automobile allowance of $750 per month, but do not reimburse our named executive officers for clubs, financial planning or items of a similar nature. In March 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an increase to Mr. Haines’ automobile allowance to $1,500 per month.

 

Messrs. Tanz, Haines and Schoebel are eligible to participate in our employee health and welfare benefit programs.The attributed costs of these benefits for our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2020 are included in the Summary Compensation Table under the column entitled “All Other Compensation” and the related footnote. Further, in accordance with the Code of Conduct, we do not make any loans to, or guarantee any personal loans of, any of our employees, including our named executive officers.

 

As discussed above in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we have entered into employment or letter agreements with each of our named executive officers. These employment and letter agreements are designed to promote our stability and continuity of senior leadership. Information with respect to applicable severance payments under these agreements for our named executive officers is provided under “—Employment and Letter Agreements and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements.”

 

Deductibility of Executive Compensation. The Compensation Committee has determined, where practical, to maximize the tax deductibility of compensation payments to our executive officers under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”) and the regulations thereunder. Section 162(m) imposes an annual individual limit of $1 million on the deductibility of our compensation payments to executives. Historically, compensation paid for achieving pre-established and objective performance goals pursuant to a plan that has been approved by our stockholders has not been subject to this limit. Although the performance-based exemption under Section 162(m) was recently repealed for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, performance-based awards that were granted on or before November 2, 2017 or compensation to be paid pursuant to binding written contracts that were in effect on November 2, 2017 will, in many circumstances, remain eligible for the performance-based exemption. OurThe Original 2009 Equity Incentive Plan iswas designed so that performance-based Restricted Share awards granted to our named executive officers under the plan on or before November 2, 2017 can bewere exempt from the compensation deduction limitation described above. Going forward, whenFor performance-based awards granted to our executive officers after November 2, 2017, the Company determines whether to use performance-based awards in its grants to our named executive officers, it will no longer be taking into account the potential tax deduction with respect to compensation for a named executive officer in excess of $1,000,000 a year, which will no longer be available, and the Company’s performance-based pay practices may change accordingly in the future.accordingly. Time-based awards are subject to the compensation deduction limitation. The Compensation Committee may authorize payments to executives that may not be fully deductible if it believes such payments are in our interests and that of our stockholders.

 

Other Tax and Accounting Implications. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 affects the tax rules applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. We believe that we are operating in good faith compliance with these statutory provisions and all subsequent regulatory authority and that the employment agreements of all of our executive officers and the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

Say-on-Pay Vote.At our 20172020 annual meeting of stockholders, we provided our stockholders with the opportunity to vote on a resolution to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee reviewed the results of this advisory “say-on-pay” vote. Our stockholders showed strong support for our executive compensation program with approximately 97%97.5% of the votes cast approving our advisory resolution. We attribute this result to the Compensation Committee’s commitment to designing and implementing an executive compensation program that aligns executive compensation with Company performance and the creation of sustainable stockholder value and its responsiveness to feedback received from our stockholders.

 

 -33--42- 

 

Compensation Committee Report

 

The Compensation Committee evaluates and establishes compensation for our named executive officers and administers the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. While management has the primary responsibility for our financial reporting process, including the disclosure of executive compensation, the Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee is satisfied that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis fairly represents the philosophy, intent and actions of the Compensation Committee with regard to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee recommended to our board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement for filing with the SEC.

 

Laura H. Pomerantz, Chair

Edward H. Meyer

Charles J. Persico

 

The foregoing Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act to be (i) “soliciting material” or “filed” or (ii) incorporated by reference by any general statement into any filing made by us with the SEC, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such report by reference.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -34--43- 

 

Compensation of Executive Officers

 

The following table summarizes the annual compensation received by our named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019 and 2015.2018.

 

20172020 Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and Principal Position Year 

Salary

($)(1)

 

Bonus

($)(1)(2)

 

Stock Awards

($)(1)(3)

 

All Other Compensation

($)(4)

 Total
($)		  Year   Salary
($)(1)		   Bonus
($)(1)(2)		   Stock
Awards
($)(1)(3)		   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(1)(4)		   All Other
Compensation
($)(5)		   Total
($)		 
Stuart A. Tanz,  2017   850,000   1,375,938   3,059,910   52,090   5,337,938   2020   875,000   1,093,750   3,801,797   —   51,430   5,821,977 
President and Chief Executive  2016   800,000   1,389,100   2,373,536   50,149   4,612,785   2019   875,000   —   3,853,887   1,225,000   47,249   6,001,136 
Officer  2015   775,000   1,344,625   2,042,170   40,390   4,202,185   2018   850,000   —   3,018,405   1,024,548   51,461   4,944,414 
                                                    
Michael B. Haines,  2017   331,000   390,477   920,430   25,465   1,667,552   2020   395,000   355,800   1,155,742   —   51,838   1,958,380 
Chief Financial Officer  2016   310,000   385,916   716,444   24,747   1,437,107   2019   375,000   —   1,220,371   398,438   48,536   2,042,345 
  2015   290,000   360,325   598,000   20,130   1,268,455   2018   356,000   —   955,811   359,774   46,437   1,718,022 
                                                    
Richard A. Baker,  2017   275,000   200,000   287,100   514   762,614   2020   275,000   180,000   405,516   —   546   861,062 
Chairman of our board of directors  2016   275,000   200,000   197,233   515   672,748   2019   275,000   200,000   428,199   —   518   903,717 
  2015   275,000   200,000   169,683   515   645,198   2018   275,000   175,000   335,371   —   516   785,887 
                                                    
Richard K. Schoebel,  2017   390,000   460,078   1,012,091   43,929   1,906,098   2020   470,000   423,500   1,267,264   —   49,492   2,210,256 
Chief Operating Officer  2016   365,000   454,385   797,360   42,389   1,659,134   2019   445,000   —   1,338,140   472,813   46,285   2,302,238 
  2015   340,000   422,450   696,670   37,514   1,496,634   2018   420,000   —   1,048,030   424,452   44,910   1,937,392 

________________________________________

(1)Material terms of the employment and letter agreements of our named executive officers are provided under “—Employment and Letter Agreements and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements.”

 

(2)Amounts in this column represent the cash component of the 2017 bonus awards that were paid to our named executive officersMessrs. Tanz, Haines, Baker and Schoebel, as applicable, on each of March 8, 2021, February 24, 2020 and February 28, 2018.2019. A substantial majority of the annual cash incentive bonus payments to Messrs. Tanz, Haines and Schoebel for 2019 and 2018 were based on certain performance criteria being met and as such those annual cash incentive bonus payments are included under the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of this table.

 

(3)Amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of such awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair values of awards have been determined based on the assumptions and methodologies set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172020 (Note 8, Stock Compensation and Other Benefit Plans for ROIC). Amounts in this column were granted on each of February 18, 2020, March 12, 2019 and March 14, 2018 in respect of named executive officer performance for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

 

(4)Amounts in this column were annual cash incentive bonuses paid to our named executive officers on each of February 24, 2020 and February 28, 2019.

(5)Amounts in this column represent all other compensation received by our named executive officers during each of 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, as itemized in the tables below.

 

The following table sets forth for each of our named executive officers the description and amount of each item comprising each officer’s total compensation appearing in the “All Other Compensation” column for the year ended December 31, 2017:2020:

 

Name Car Allowance
($)		 Health Insurance
($)		 401(k) Plan Company Match
($)		 Dental Insurance
($)		 Total
($)		 Car Allowance
($)		 Health Insurance
($)		 401(k) Plan
Company Match
($)		 Dental
Insurance
($)		 Total
($)
Stuart A. Tanz  18,000   25,863   5,400   2,827   52,090   18,000   25,678   5,700   2,052   51,430 
                                        
Michael B. Haines  9,000   10,016   5,400   1,229   25,645   18,000   26,086   5,700   2,052   51,838 
                                        
Richard A. Baker  –   –   –   514   514   —   —   —   546   546 
                                        
Richard K. Schoebel  18,000   17,702   5,400   2,827   43,929   18,000   22,829   5,700   2,963   49,492 

 

 -35--44- 

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

The following table summarizes certain information regarding all plan-based awards granted during the 20172020 fiscal year to our named executive officers.

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20172020

 

   Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards Target (#)(1) All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards  Grant   Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards ($)(1)		   Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards Target (#)(2)		   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(3)		   Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(4)		 
Name Grant Date Threshold Target Maximum (#)(2) ($)(3)  Date   Threshold   Target   Maximum   Threshold   Target   High   Exceptional         
Stuart A. Tanz 2/22/2017  40,475   80,950   121,425       1,333,675   —   656,250   1,093,750   1,531,250   —   —   —   —   —   — 
 2/22/2017              80,950   1,724,235   2/18/2020   —   —   —   55,113   110,229   165,342   220,458   110,229   3,801,797 
                                        
Michael B. Haines 2/22/2017  12,175   24,350   36,525       401,775   —   296,250   395,000   493,750   —   —   —   —   —   — 
 2/22/2017              24,350   518,665   2/18/2020   —   —   —   16,753   33,509   50,262   67,018   33,510   1,155,742 
                                        
Richard A. Baker 2/22/2017  8,700   17,400   26,100       287,100   —   —   —   —   —   —   —   —   —   — 
  2/18/2020   —   —   —   5,877   11,757   17,634   23,514   11,758   405,516 
                                        
Richard K. Schoebel 2/22/2017  13,387   26,775   40,162       441,783   —   352,500   470,000   587,500   —   —   —   —   —   — 
 2/22/2017              26,775   570,308   2/18/2020   —   —   —   18,371   36,743   55,114   73,486   36,743   1,267,264 

_____________________________________

(1)Represents the 2020 annual cash incentive bonus opportunities for each of our named executive officers. For a detailed discussion of the performance thresholds and methodology underlying the cash incentive bonus opportunities, see “—Elements of Executive Compensation— Annual Cash Incentives.”

(2)Vest on January 1, 20202023 based upon the achievement of specified performance criteria over a three-year vesting period. For a detailed discussion of the performance thresholds and methodology underlying the equity grants,awards, see “—Equity Grants.Elements of Executive Compensation— Long-Term Equity-Based Awards.” The awards were allocated 50% to awards that vest based on Absolute TSR performance and 50% that vest based on Relative TSR performance.

 

(2)(3)Vest ratably over a three-year vesting period beginning on January 1, 20182020 based solely on continued employment.

 

(3)(4)Amounts in this column represent the aggregate value of the Restricted Share and Option awards granted in 20172020 based upon the aggregate grant date fair value of such awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair values of awards have been determined based on the assumptions and methodologies set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172020 (Note 8, Stock Compensation and Other Benefit Plans for ROIC).

 

-45-

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End 20172020

 

The following table summarizes all outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers on December 31, 2017.2020.

 

 Option Awards Stock Awards Option Awards Stock Awards
Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) (Exercisable) Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(1)

 Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
(Exercisable)		 Option
Exercise Price
($)		 Option
Expiration
Date		 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Shares or Units of Stock
That Have Not Vested (#)		 

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested ($)(1)

Stuart A. Tanz  100,000   10.25   10/20/2019   –   –   —   —   —   135,362(2)  1,812,497 
  –   –   –   45,532(2)  908,363   —   —   —   175,850(3)  2,354,632 
  –   –   –   117,333(3)  2,340,793   —   —   —   220,458(4)  2,951,933 
  –   –   –   161,900(4)  3,229,905                     
Michael B. Haines  25,000   12.41   12/1/2022   –   –   —   —   —   42,864(2)  573,949 
  –   –   –   13,332(2)  265,973   —   —   —   55,685(3)  745,622 
  –   –   –   35,416(3)  706,549   —   —   —   67,019(4)  897,384 
  –   –   –   48,700(4)  971,565                     
Richard A. Baker  50,000   10.25   10/20/2019   –   –   —   —   —   15,040(2)  201,386 
  –   –   –   3,782(2)  75,451   —   —   —   19,538(3)  261,614 
  –   –   –   9,750(3)  194,513   —   —   —   23,515(4)  314,866 
  –   –   –   17,400(5)  347,130                     
Richard K. Schoebel  35,000   10.40   12/9/2019   –   –   35,000   10.88   3/11/2021   —   — 
  35,000   10.88   3/11/2021   –   –   —   —   —   47,000(2)  629,330 
  –   –   –   15,532(2)  309,863   —   —   —   61,058(3)  817,567 
  –   –   –   39,416(3)  786,349   —   —   —   73,486(4)  983,978 
  –   –   –   53,550(4)  1,068,323 

______________________________________

(1)For purposes of this table, the market value of the Restricted Shares is deemed to be $19.95$13.39 per share, the closing price of the Common Stock reported on NASDAQ on December 29, 201731, 2020 (the last trading day of the year).

 

-36-

(2)Comprised of Restricted Share awards granted on February 24, 2015.March 14, 2018. 50% of such Restricted Share awards vestwere time-based and vested ratably over a three-year period based solely on continued employment or service and 50% of such Restricted Share awards vestwere performance-based and vested based upon the achievement of specified performance criteria.  Thesecriteria over a three-year period. 33.33% of such time-based Restricted Share awards vested on each of January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2020 and the remaining 33.34% of such time-based Restricted Share awards vested on January 1, 2018.2021 and a portion of such performance-based Restricted Share awards vested on January 1, 2021.

 

(3)Comprised of Restricted Share and LTIP unit awards granted on February 23, 2016.March 12, 2019. 50% of such awards are time-based Restricted Share awards and vest ratably over a three-year period based solely on continued employment or service and 50% of such awards are performance-based LTIP unit awards and vest based upon the achievement of specified performance criteria over a three-year period. 16.67%33.33% of such time-based Restricted Share awards vested on each of January 1, 20172020 and assumingJanuary 1, 2021. Assuming continued employment or service and the achievement of specified performance criteria, the remaining 16.67%33.34% of such awardstime-based Restricted Share award will vest on January 1, 20182022 and 66.67%100% of such awardsperformance-based LTIP unit award will vest on January 1, 2019.2022.

 

(4)Comprised of Restricted Share awards granted on February 22, 2017.18, 2020. 50% of such Restricted Share awards are time-based and vest ratably over a three-year period based solely on continued employment or service and 50% of such Restricted Share awards are performance-based and vest based upon the achievement of specified performance criteria over a three-year period. 16.67%33.33% of such time-based Restricted Share awards vested on January 1, 2018 and, assuming2021. Assuming continued employment or service and the achievement of specified performance criteria, the remaining 16.67%66.67% of such time-based Restricted Share awards will vest ratably on January 1, 2022 and January 1, 2023 and 100% of such performance-based Restricted Share awards will vest on January 1, 2019 and 66.67% of such awards will vest on January 1, 2020.

(5)Comprised of a Restricted Share award granted on February 22, 2017.  100% of such award vests based upon the achievement of specified performance criteria over a three-year period.  Assuming continued employment or service and the achievement of specified performance criteria, 100% of such award will vest on January 1, 2020.2023.

 

As of December 31, 2020, our named executive officers held an aggregate of 749,596 unvested Restricted Shares, 187,279 LTIP units and 35,000 Options. As of the Record Date, under the Original 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, there were outstanding Options to acquire a total of 67,000 shares of Common Stock at a weighted average purchase price of $11.60 per share, and no Restricted Shares still subject to forfeiture. During 2020, no Options were exercised and no outstanding Options for any of our named executive officers were repriced. As of the Record Date, 1,861,048 shares of Common Stock remained available for grant to eligible participants under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, and a total of 1,158,953 Restricted Shares and 187,279 LTIP units remained subject to forfeiture.

-46-

Option Exercises and StockEquity Vested

 

The following table summarizes certain information regarding options exercised and shareequity awards vested with respect to our named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.

 

 Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2017 Option Exercises and Equity Vested in 2020
 Option Awards Stock Awards  Option Awards   Equity Awards 
Name Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) Value Realized on Exercise
($)		 Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) Value Realized on Vesting
($)		  Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)		   Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)		   Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)		   Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)		 
Stuart A. Tanz  –   –   119,001   2,514,491   —   —   139,312   1,865,388 
Michael B. Haines  –   –   32,084   677,935   —   —   43,650   584,474 
Richard A. Baker  –   –   8,234   173,984   —   —   15,317   205,095 
Richard K. Schoebel  –   –   38,418   811,772   —   —   47,862   640,872 

Chief Executive Officer Compensation Pay Ratio

 

We believe our executive compensation program must be equitable to motivate our employees to create stockholder value. We monitor the relationship between the compensation of our executive officers and the compensation of our other employees. For 2017,2020, the total compensation of Stuart A. Tanz, our President and Chief Executive Officer of $5,337,938,$5,821,977, as shown in the Summary Compensation Table above, (our “CEO Compensation”), was approximately 4642 times the total compensation of a median employee, which was calculated in the same manner, and was $116,307.$138,156.

 

We identified the median employee using the annual base salary as of December 31, 2017,2020, plus any annual cash bonusesincentive bonus received during 20172020 and any long termlong-term incentive shareequity awards vested in 20172020 for all individuals, excluding our Chief Executive Officer, who were employed by us on December 31, 2017,2020, the last day of our payroll year (whether employed on a full-time, part-time, or seasonal basis). If such median employee’s total compensation was not comparable to the CEO Compensation, for example, because such median employee was hired at the end of the year and thus did not receive long term incentive sharelong-term equity-based awards in 2017,2020, we used the next lower employee who was comparable as the median employee. After identifying the median employee, we calculated annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology we use for our CEO Compensation.

 

Pension Benefits

 

Our named executive officers received no benefits in 20172020 from us under defined pension or defined contribution plans.

 

Employment and Letter Agreements and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements

We have employment and letter agreements with each of our named executive officers.  As described below, these employment and letter agreements provide our named executive officers with, among other things, base salary, bonus and certain payments at, following and/or in connection with certain terminations of employment or a change in control involving the Company.  As used below, the terms “Cause,” “Change in Control,” “Disability” and “Good Reason” shall have the respective meanings set forth in the applicable employment or letter agreements, as applicable.

-37-

Stuart A. Tanz.  Mr. Tanz’s employment agreement, which became effective as of March 21, 2017 and has an initial term scheduled to expire on March 21, 2021, provides that he will serve as our Chief Executive Officer and President for an initial term of four years, with automatic renewal for additional one-year terms unless we give prior written notice of non-renewal at least six months prior to the endSummary of the then current term.  Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Tanz is entitled to an annual base salary of $850,000, subject to annual review and upward adjustment, and an annual bonus between 0% and 175% of his then annual base salary, as determined in the sole discretion of our board of directors and based on Mr. Tanz’s performance and the performance of the Company.  Mr. Tanz is entitled to participate in all of our employee benefit plans and programs or other welfare benefit programs as made generally available to other senior executives.  Mr. Tanz is also entitled to (i) reimbursement for reasonable business expenses; and (ii) an automobile allowance of $1,500 per month.

Mr. Tanz’s employment agreement provides that if his employment is terminated (i) by us without Cause, (ii) by Mr. Tanz for Good Reason, (iii) upon non-renewal of the employment term by us, or (iv) by reason of Mr. Tanz’s death or Disability, (and provided Mr. Tanz executes and delivers a general release of claims in favor of the Company) he will be entitled to receive (A) a lump sum payment equal to (i) annual salary, annual bonus and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of termination, and (ii) (x) two times annual salary and (y) two times the average of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years immediately preceding the year of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to two times 50% of Mr. Tanz’s then annual salary), and (B) continuing medical and dental benefits for 24 months under the Company’s health plans and programs applicable to senior executives as he would have received in the absence of such termination.  In addition to the foregoing, all outstanding unvested equity-based incentives and awards will vest and become free from restrictions and be exercisable in accordance with their terms.  Mr. Tanz’s employment agreement also provides that if his employment is terminated by us without Cause or by Mr. Tanz for Good Reason within the 12 month period following a Change in Control, he will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to the benefits listed above, except that he will receive three times annual salary and three times the average of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years immediately preceding the year of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to three times 50% of Mr. Tanz’s then annual salary). To the extent that any of the foregoing payments so made constitutes an “excess parachute payment” under certain tax laws, rules and regulations, we will pay to Mr. Tanz (i) in full as provided above or (ii) in such lesser amount as would result in no portion of any payments or benefits being subject to the excise tax under the Internal Revenue Code, whichever of the foregoing options (i) or (ii) results in the Mr. Tanz’s receipt, on an after-tax basis, of the greater amount of payments and benefits.

Mr. Tanz has also agreed that he will not (i) compete with us; (ii) solicit our employees, agents or independent contractors; or (iii) solicit or intentionally interfere with our customer or client relationships for the period commencing on the date of the agreement and ending one year following the date upon which Mr. Tanz ceases to be an employee of the Company and our affiliates.  His employment agreement also contains customary provisions relating to confidentiality and mutual non-disparagement.

Michael B. HainesAmended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.Mr. Haines’s employment agreement, which became effective as of March 21, 2017 and has an initial term scheduled to expire on March 21, 2021, provides that he will serve as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary for an initial term of four years, with automatic renewal for additional one-year terms unless we give prior written notice of non-renewal at least six months prior to the end of the then current term.  Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Haines is entitled to a base salary of $331,000, subject to review and upward adjustment, and an annual bonus between 0% and 125% of his then annual base salary, as determined in the sole discretion of our board of directors and based on Mr. Haines’ performance and the performance of the Company.  Mr. Haines is also entitled to participate in all of our employee benefit plans and programs on substantially the same terms and conditions as other senior executives.  Mr. Haines is entitled to (i) reimbursement for reasonable business expenses; and (ii) an automobile allowance of $750 per month. In March 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an increase to Mr. Haines’ automobile allowance to $1,500 per month.

-38-

Mr. Haines’ employment agreement provides that if Mr. Haines’ employment is terminated by reason of his death or Disability, he will be entitled to receive (i) a lump sum payment equal to (A) annual salary, annual bonus and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of termination, and (B) (x) his annual salary and (y) an amount equal to the average of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years immediately preceding the year of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to one times 50% of Mr. Haines’ then annual salary), and (ii) continuing medical and dental benefits for 12 months under the Company’s health plans and programs applicable to senior executives as he would have received in the absence of such termination.  In addition to the foregoing, all outstanding unvested equity-based incentives and awards will vest and become free from restrictions and be exercisable in accordance with their terms.  Additionally, if Mr. Haines’ employment is terminated (A) by us without Cause, (B) by Mr. Haines for Good Reason, (C) upon non-renewal of the employment term by us, or (D) by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Haines for Good Reason within the 12-month period following a Change in Control, (and provided Mr. Haines executes and delivers a general release of claims in favor of the Company) he will be entitled to receive (i) a lump sum payment equal to (A) annual salary, annual bonus and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of termination, and (B) (x) two times annual salary and (y) two times the average of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years immediately preceding the year of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to two times 50% of Mr.  Haines’ then annual salary), and (ii) continuing medical and dental benefits for 18 months under the Company’s health plans and programs applicable to senior executives as he would have received in the absence of such termination.  In addition to the foregoing, all outstanding unvested equity-based incentives and awards will vest and become free from restrictions and be exercisable in accordance with their terms. To the extent that any of the foregoing payments so made constitutes an “excess parachute payment” under certain tax laws, rules and regulations, we will pay to Mr. Haines (i) in full as provided above or (ii) in such lesser amount as would result in no portion of any payments or benefits being subject to the excise tax under the Internal Revenue Code, whichever of the foregoing options (i) or (ii) results in the Mr. Haines’ receipt, on an after-tax basis, of the greater amount of payments and benefits.

Mr. Haines has also agreed that he will not, for the period commencing on the date of the agreement and ending one year following the date upon which Mr. Haines ceases to be an employee of the Company and our affiliates, (i) compete with us, (ii) solicit our employees, agents or independent contractors, or (iii) solicit or intentionally interfere with our customer or client relationships.  Mr. Haines’ employment agreement also contains customary provisions relating to confidentiality and mutual non-disparagement.

Richard A. Baker.  On April 2, 2012, we entered into an amendment to Mr. Baker’s letter agreement with us, providing for his transition from Executive Chairman to non-executive Chairman of our board of directors, effective following our 2012 Annual Meeting.  The term of the amended letter agreement is through October 20, 2015, unless Mr. Baker is not re-elected as one of our directors or his service as Chairman of our board of directors is discontinued by our board of directors or by Mr. Baker prior to such date. Mr. Baker continues to serve as non-executive Chairman of our board of directors and the Company and Mr. Baker are in discussions regarding a further extension of his agreement.

The amendment to the letter agreement provides that Mr. Baker continued to receive the annual base salary and bonus specified in his prior letter agreement through October 19, 2012, which is the date of the expiration of the initial term of his prior agreement.  The amended letter agreement provides that during the balance of the term of the amended letter agreement Mr. Baker will receive annual compensation at a rate of $275,000.  However, such compensation shall not extend beyond the date of Mr. Baker’s termination as non-executive Chairman of our board directors, unless such termination results from a decision taken by our board of directors without Mr. Baker’s approval to discontinue his service.  Mr. Baker’s base salary is subject to annual review and upward adjustment in the discretion of the Compensation Committee.  Mr. Baker is eligible for an annual bonus to be determined in the sole discretion of our board of directors and based on Mr. Baker’s performance and our performance.  Mr. Baker is also entitled to reimbursement for reasonable business expenses and a travel allowance determined annually by the Compensation Committee together with Mr. Baker.

Under the amendment to the letter agreement, Mr. Baker has agreed that during the period he serves as Chairman of our board of directors, and (unless the board of directors elects not to continue Mr. Baker as Chairman without Mr. Baker’s approval to discontinue his service) for a one-year period following such service, he will not become a senior executive officer of a U.S.-based, publicly traded, necessity-based, retail REIT nor will he solicit our employees, agents or independent contractors to leave their employment or other service with us.  Mr. Baker’s letter agreement also contains customary provisions relating to confidentiality and mutual non-disparagement.  In addition, under the amendment to the letter agreement, we and Mr. Baker agreed, with effect from October 20, 2012, to terminate his commitment to first offer to us retail properties located in the United States that he may discover prior to taking any interest in such property directly or indirectly for his own account or offering such property to other persons or entities.

-39-

Richard K. Schoebel.  Mr. Schoebel’s employment agreement, which became effective as of March 21, 2017 and has an initial term scheduled to expire March 21, 2021, provides that he will serve as our Chief Operating Officer for an initial term of four years, with automatic renewal for additional one-year terms unless we give prior written notice of non-renewal at least six months prior to the end of the then current term.  Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Schoebel is entitled to a base salary of $390,000, subject to review and upward adjustment, and an annual bonus between 0% and 125% of his then annual base salary, as determined in the sole discretion of our board of directors and based on Mr. Schoebel’s performance and the performance of the Company.  Mr. Schoebel is also entitled to participate in all of our employee benefit plans and programs on substantially the same terms and conditions as other senior executives.  Mr. Schoebel is also entitled to (i) reimbursement for reasonable business expenses; and (ii) an automobile allowance of $1,500 per month.

Mr. Schoebel’s employment agreement provides that if Mr. Schoebel’s employment is terminated by reason of his death or Disability, he will be entitled to receive (i) a lump sum payment equal to, (A) annual salary, annual bonus and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of termination, and (B) (x) his annual salary and (y) an amount equal to the average of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years immediately preceding the year of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to one times 50% of Mr. Schoebel’s then annual salary), and (ii) continuing medical and dental benefits for 12 months under the Company’s health plans and programs applicable to senior executives as he would have received in the absence of such termination.  In addition to the foregoing, all outstanding unvested equity-based incentives and awards will vest and become free from restrictions and be exercisable in accordance with their terms.  Additionally, if Mr. Schoebel’s employment is terminated (A) by us without Cause, (B) by Mr. Schoebel for Good Reason, (C) upon non-renewal of the employment term by us, or (D) by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Schoebel for Good Reason within the 12-month period following a Change in Control, (and provided Mr. Schoebel executes and delivers a general release of claims in favor of the Company) he will be entitled to receive (i) a lump sum payment equal to (A) annual salary, annual bonus and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of termination, and (B) (x) two times annual salary and (y) two times the average of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years immediately preceding the year of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to two times 50% of Mr. Schoebel’s then annual salary), and (ii) continuing medical and dental benefits for 18 months under the Company’s health plans and programs applicable to senior executives as he would have received in the absence of such termination.  In addition to the foregoing, all outstanding unvested equity-based incentives and awards will vest and become free from restrictions and be exercisable in accordance with their terms. To the extent that any of the foregoing payments so made constitutes an “excess parachute payment” under certain tax laws, rules and regulations, we will pay to Mr. Schoebel (i) in full as provided above or (ii) in such lesser amount as would result in no portion of any payments or benefits being subject to the excise tax under the Internal Revenue Code, whichever of the foregoing options (i) or (ii) results in the Mr. Schoebel’s receipt, on an after-tax basis, of the greater amount of payments and benefits.

Mr. Schoebel has also agreed that he will not, for the period commencing on the date of the agreement and ending one year following the date upon which Mr. Schoebel ceases to be an employee of the Company and our affiliates, (i) compete with us, (ii) solicit our employees, agents or independent contractors, or (iii) solicit or intentionally interfere with our customer or client relationships.  Mr. Schoebel’s employment agreement also contains customary provisions relating to confidentiality and mutual non-disparagement.

Potential Payments upon a Change in Control or Termination

 

The following table sets forthis a summary of the cash amounts, accelerated vesting of equity awards and other payments and benefits that our named executive officers would be entitled to receive under various circumstances pursuant to the terms of theAmended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the grant agreements made underForm 8-K filed with the SEC on May 1, 2018, and which is incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement. This summary and the summaries of the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and their respective employment agreementselsewhere in the event that the employment termination scenarios described above under “—Employment and Letter Agreements and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements” were to have occurred on December 31, 2017. The actual amounts that would be paid on any termination of employment can only be determined at the time of any actual separation from the Company.

-40-

Event Stuart A. Tanz Michael B. Haines Richard A. Baker Richard K. Schoebel

By Company without Cause,

by Employee for Good Reason or upon non-renewal of employment by the Company, and with no Change in Control:(*)

                
Cash Severance(1)    4,465,038   1,488,393   –   1,754,463 
Equity Awards(4)  6,479,061   1,944,087   –   2,164,535 
Other Benefits(5)  57,380   16,868   –   30,794 
Total  11,001,479   3,449,348   –   3,949,792 
                 
By Company without Cause, by Employee for Good Reason, and following a Change in Control:(*)                
Cash Severance(2)  6,697,557   1,488,393   –   1,754,463 
Equity Awards(4)  6,479,061   1,944,087   617,094   2,164,535 
Other Benefits(5)  57,380   16,868   –   30,794 

Total(6)

  13,233,998   3,449,348   617,094   3,949,792 
                 
Death or Disability:(*)                
Cash Severance(3)    4,465,038   744,197   –   877,232 
Equity Awards(4)  6,479,061   1,944,087   617,094   2,164,535 
Other Benefits(5)  57,380   11,245   –   20,529 
Total  11,001,479   2,699,529   617,094   3,062,296 
                 
By Company with Cause or by Employee without Good Reason:(7)                  
Cash Severance  –   –   –   – 
Equity Awards  –   –   –   – 
Other Benefits  –   –   –   – 
Total  –   –   –   – 

_______________

(*)All amounts are in dollars.

(1)Reflects the aggregate of (i) 2.0 times base salary (using base salaries as of the date of this Proxy Statement) and (ii) 2.0 times the average of the cash bonuses earned for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Amounts assume any accrued base salary and bonus have been paid up to the date of calculation.

(2)Reflects the aggregate of (i) 2.0 times (3.0 times for Mr. Tanz) base salary (using base salaries as of the date of this Proxy Statement) and (ii) 2.0 times (3.0 times for Mr. Tanz) the average of the cash bonuses earned for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

(3)Reflects the aggregate of (i) 1.0 times (2.0 times for Mr. Tanz) base salary (using base salaries as of the date of this Proxy Statement) and (ii) 1.0 times (2.0 times for Mr. Tanz) the average of the cash bonuses earned for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

(4)Reflects the number of shares received pursuant to equity awards that had not vested as of December 31, 2017 (see “—Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2017”) multiplied by $19.95 per share, the closing price of the Common Stock reported on NASDAQ on December 29, 2017 (the last trading day of the year). For unvested performance-based equity awards subject to “threshold,” “target” and “maximum” bonus opportunity levels, amounts have been calculated assuming a “target” bonus opportunity level payout.

(5)Reflects continuing medical and dental benefits for 18 months (24 months for Mr. Tanz, and in the case of Messrs. Haines and Schoebel in the event of death or disability, 12 months) calculated using the amounts received during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Amounts assume any accrued benefits have been paid up to the date of calculation.

(6)To the extent that any of the payments made upon a change in control constitute an “excess parachute payment” under certain tax laws, rules and regulations, we will pay (i) the total in full or (ii) such lesser amount as would result in no portion of any payments or benefits being subject to such excise tax, whichever of the foregoing options (i) or (ii) results in the receipt, on an after-tax basis, of the greater amount of payments and benefits.

(7)Amounts assume any accrued base salary, bonus and other benefits have been paid up to the date of calculation.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors: Laura H. Pomerantz (Chair), Edward H. Meyer and Charles J. Persico.  No memberthis Proxy Statement may not contain all of the Compensation Committee is or was an employee or officer ofinformation about the Company or had any relationships requiring disclosure under the rules and regulations of the Exchange Act.  There are no Compensation Committee interlocks and no insider participation in compensation decisions that are required to be reported under the rules and regulations of the Exchange Act.

-41-

PROPOSAL 4

APPROVAL OF Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan

General

that is of importance to you and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the complete text of the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. We are asking stockholdersencourage you to approveread the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Amended Plan”), which is an amendmentcarefully and restatementin its entirety for a more complete understanding of the Company’s existingAmended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. On March 20, 2018, our board of directors approved the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Amended Plan”), subject to stockholder approval.

 

Our board of directors believes the Amended Plan is essential to the Company’s ability to continue to attract, retain and motivate talented individuals critical to the growth and long-term success of the Company. Equity-based incentives are an important part of the Company’s overall compensation program as they align the interests of our management and non-employee directors with those of our stockholders and help ensure a pay-for-performance linkage. The Company’s existing 2009 Equity Incentive Plan expires in August 2019 and, as of the date of this Proxy Statement, 589,779 shares of Common Stock remained available for grant under the existing 2009 Equity Incentive plan.

The Amended Plan includes the following key changes:

·implements a fungible unit system that counts the number of shares of Common Stock used in the issuance of full-value awards, such as Restricted Share awards, differently from the number of shares used in the issuance of stock options;

·establishes the number of fungible units available as 22,500,000 fungible units, which will be depleted at different rates, depending on whether full-value awards, such as Restricted Share awards, or option awards are granted;

·the fungible units represent a maximum of 3,600,000 shares of Common Stock that could be granted as full-value awards, such as Restricted Share awards, which amount includes the 589,779 shares of Common Stock that remain available for grant under the existing 2009 Equity Incentive Plan as of the date of this Proxy Statement and will be included in the fungible unit limit;

·imposes a $500,000 limit on the total aggregate value of cash compensation and equity-based awards granted under the Amended Plan for any non-employee director during any calendar year;

·extends the term of the plan until April 25, 2028; and

·revises the performance-based pay sections of the plan to reflect the repeal of the performance-based pay exception to the Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) deduction limit.

If the Amended Plan is approved, it will become effective on the date of the Annual Meeting.

Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of the Amended Plan.

A copy of the Amended Plan is included as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

Proposed Share Reserve Increase

We are asking our stockholders to approve the Amended Plan because we believe the availability of an adequate reserve of shares under an incentive compensation plan is important to our continued growth and success. The purpose of the Amended Plan is to assist us in attracting, motivating and retaining talented individuals who serve as our employees, non-employee directors and consultants, whose judgment, interest and special effort is critical to our long-term success. The ability to grant incentive awards is an important part of our executive compensation program as they help ensure a pay for performance linkage and align the interests of our management team, as well as other recipients, with those of our stockholders by motivating our management team to increase long-term stockholder value. We believe that our long-term success depends in large measure on the talents of our management team and other employees, and grants of incentive awards are necessary to enable us to continue to retain and attract top talent. If the Amended Plan is not approved, we believe our recruitment and retention capabilities will be adversely affected.

-42-

Shares Available for Issuance

 

The Amended Plan establishes 22,500,000 fungible units under the Amended Plan. The fungible units represent the baseline for the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Amended Plan from which, as described in more detail below, different types of awardsWe are counted differently against a fungible unit limit. By establishing a fungible unit pool, we will be able to continue to use equity awards to attract, retain and motivate employees. We believe that having an incentive compensation plan in place with a sufficient number of shares is critical to our ability to attract, retain and motivate employees in a highly competitive marketplace and ensure that our executive compensation program is structured in a manner that aligns our executives’ interests with our success and the creation of stockholder value.

Burn Rate

The following table sets forth information regarding historical awards granted and earned under the Amended Plan for the period 2015 through 2017, and the corresponding burn rate, which is defined as the number of shares subject to share awards granted (or, for awards subject to performance-based vesting, earned) in a fiscal year divided by the weighted average shares of Common Stock outstanding for that fiscal year, for each of the last three fiscal years:

Year 

Total Full-Value Awards Granted or Earned(1)

 

Burn Rate Conversion Factor(2)

 

Total Granted or Earned = Adjusted Full-Value Shares(3)

 Weighted Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding 

Current Adjusted Burn Rate(4)

2017  349,261   3.0   1,047,783   109,400,123   0.96%
2016  337,556   3.0   1,012,668   104,072,222   0.97%
2015  321,963   3.0   965,889   95,651,780   1.01%
3-Year Average   0.98%

_________________

(1)Total full-value awards granted is the sum of time-based awards granted during each fiscal year and performance-based full-value shares earned each fiscal year (regardless if the settlement of such earned shares was in the following year).

(2)Burn Rate Conversion Factor assumes ISS’ multiplier based on the Company’s annual stock price volatility, which is 3.0.

(3)Adjusted full-value shares are calculated by multiplying the total full-value shares granted by the burn rate conversion factor.

(4)The current burn rate is equal to the adjusted full-value shares as a percentage of the weighted average shares of Common Stock outstanding.

Background of Reasons for and the Determination of Fungible Units Under the Amended Plan

During the fourth quarter of 2009, we adopted the existing 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, as approved by our stockholders. The existing 2009 Equity Incentive Plan has not been amended since that time. As of the Record Date, we had issued and outstanding 112,544,925 shares of Common Stock. As of the Record Date, under the existing 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, there were outstanding Options to acquire a total of 278,500 shares of Common Stock at a weighted average purchase price of $10.79 per share, and a total of 660,098 Restricted Shares remained subject to forfeiture.  As of the Record Date, 950,179 shares of Common Stock remained available for use in grants to eligible participants under the existing 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. On March 14, 2018, we granted a total of 360,400 Restricted Shares in respect of 2017 performance, including the awards granted to our named executive officers as described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Equity Grants.” Accordingly, as of the date of this Proxy Statement, 589,779 shares of Common Stock remained available for grant under the existing 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.

Our board of directors approved the Amended Plan primarily to ensure the Company will have an available pool of fungible units (which correspond to shares of Common Stock) from which to grant long-term equity incentive awards, which we believe is a critical incentive and retention mechanism for the Company’s employees, directors and consultants. Our board of directors reviewed and took into consideration the Compensation Committee’s recommendations, which were based on an analysis prepared by and recommendations of FTI Consulting, Inc., the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, and then determined the number of fungible units to reserve under the Amended Plan.

-43-

This review included consideration of the following key metrics, factors and philosophies:

Reasonable Plan Cost

·Permits continued alignment of interests of our key employees and non-employee directors through use of equity compensation.

·Reasonable number of additional shares requested: 22,500,000 fungible units represents a maximum of 3,600,000 full-value awards, which amount includes 589,779 shares of Common Stock that remain available for grant under the existing 2009 Equity Incentive Plan as of the date of this Proxy Statement and will be included in the fungible unit limit.

Responsible Grant Practices

·The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant has advised us that our 0.98% historic three-year average burn rate is well below the ISS Real Estate industry benchmark for the Russell 3000 Index of 2.82%.

·Our current practice is to provide that full-value equity awards vest over a period of three years or subject to a three-year forward-looking performance period.

·Robust stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and non-employee directors.

Stockholder-Friendly Plan Features

·No repricing permitted without stockholder approval.

·No cash buyouts of stock options without stockholder approval.

·Stockholder approval required to increase the share reserve (i.e., no “evergreen” feature).

In light of the factors described above, and the fact that the ability to continue to grant equity compensation is vital to our ability to continue to attract and retain employees in the competitive industry in which we compete, our board of directors has determined that the size of the fungible unit reserve under the Amended Plan is reasonable and appropriate at this time.

If the stockholders approve this Proposal 4, then under the Amended Plan we will be authorized to issue a total number of fungible units equal to 22,500,000 fungible units (the “Fungible Pool Limit”). Fungible units represent the baseline for the number of shares available for issuance under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. Different types of awards granted under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan following the effective date of the Amended Plan will beare counted differently against the Fungible Pool Limit, as follows:

 

-47-

·Each share issued or to be issued in connection with an award, other than an option, right or other award that does not deliver the full-value at grant of the underlying shares will be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 6.25 fungible units; and

 

·Options and other awards that do not deliver the full-value at grant of the underlying shares will be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 1.0 fungible unit.

 

The 22,500,000 fungible units represent a maximum of 3,600,000 shares of Common Stock that could be granted pursuant to the Amended Plan as full-value awards, following the effective date of the Amended Plan, based on the 6.25 to 1.0 fungible unit-to-full-value award conversion ratio. Based solely on the closing price of the Common Stock as reported by NASDAQ on March 22, 2018 of $17.29, the aggregate market value of those 3,600,000 shares of Common Stock was $62,244,000.

The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted as Incentive Stock Options under the Amended Plan following the effective date of the Amended Plan pursuant to Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code is 22,500,000.

 

In light of the factors described above, our board of directors believes this number represents reasonable potential equity dilution and provides a significant incentive for officers, employees, non-employee directors and consultants to increase the value of the Company for all stockholders.

-44-

The Amended Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee. The Amended Plan will permit the granting of stock options, Restricted Shares, share appreciation rights, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights and other equity-based awards.

Summary of the Amended Plan

The following is a summary of the Amended Plan, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement. This summary and the summaries of the Amended Plan elsewhere in this Proxy Statement may not contain all of the information about the Amended Plan that is of importance to you and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the complete text of the Amended Plan. We encourage you to read the Amended Plan carefully and in its entirety for a more complete understanding of the Amended Plan.

Administration

 

The Compensation Committee has been appointeddelegated by our board of directors to administer the Amended Plan and will have the full authority to administer and interpret the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, to authorize the granting of awards, to determine the eligibility of directors, officers, consultants and other key personnel and service providers, to determine the number of shares of Common Stock to be covered by each award (subject to the individual participant limitations provided in the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan), to determine the terms, provisions and conditions of each award (which may not be inconsistent with the terms of the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan), to prescribe the form of instruments evidencing awards and to take any other actions and make all other determinations that it deems necessary or appropriate in connection with the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan or the administration or interpretation thereof. In connection with this authority, the Compensation Committee may, among other things, establish performance goals that must be met in order for awards to be granted or to vest, or for the restrictions on any such awards to lapse. The Compensation Committee consists solely of non-employee directors, each of whom is intended to be, to the extent required by Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, a non-employee director.

 

Eligibility

 

All of our employees, non-employee directors, executive officers, consultants and other key personnel and service providers as well as our subsidiaries and any of our affiliates are eligible to receive awards under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.

 

Because the grant of awards under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan is within the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and possibly subject to various performance factors which cannot, as yet, be determined, the Company cannot determine the dollar value or number of shares of Common Stock that will in the future be received by or allocated to any participant in the Amended Plan.

New Plan Benefits

The future benefits or amounts that would be received pursuant to the Amended Plan are discretionary and are therefore not determinable at this time. Similarly, the benefits or amounts which would have been received by or allocated to the Company’s executive officers and other employees for the last completed fiscal year if the Amended Plan had been in effect cannot be determined. All awards granted in the last completed fiscal year pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan to our named executive officers are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table for 2017 in this Proxy Statement. For additional information regarding the size and structure of past awards, please see the disclosures in this Proxy Statement under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2017” and “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End 2017.”Plan.

-45-

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table presents certain information about the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017:

Plan Category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column of this table)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders(1)  278,500   10.79   1,103,418 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders  —   —   — 
Total  278,500   10.79   1,103,418 

_________________

(1)Amounts are under the existing 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.

 

Options

 

The terms of specific options, including whether options shall constitute “incentive stock options” for purposes of Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, shall be determined by the Compensation Committee. The exercise price of an option shall be determined by the Compensation Committee and reflected in the applicable award agreement. The exercise price with respect to incentive stock options may not be lower than 100% (110% in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% stockholder, if permitted under the plan) of the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant. Each option will be exercisable after the period or periods specified in the award agreement, which will generally not exceed ten years from the date of grant (or five years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% stockholder, if permitted under the plan). Options will be exercisable at such times and subject to such terms as determined by the Compensation Committee.

 

Share Awards

 

The Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan also provides for the grant of share awards. A Restricted Share award is an award of shares of Common Stock that is subject to restrictions on transferability and such other restrictions, if any, as the Compensation Committee may impose at the date of grant. Grants of Restricted Shares will be subject to vesting schedules as determined by the Compensation Committee. The restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, including, without limitation, a specified period of employment or the satisfaction of pre-established criteria, in such installments or otherwise, as the Compensation Committee may determine. A participant granted Restricted Shares has all of the rights of a stockholder, including, without limitation, the right to vote and the right to receive dividends on the Restricted Shares. Although dividends may be paid on Restricted Shares, whether or not vested, at the same rate and on the same date as on shares of our Common Stock, holders of Restricted Shares are prohibited from selling such shares until they vest.

 

-48-

Share Appreciation Rights

 

Share appreciation rights, when issued, will reduce the number of shares available for grant under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and will vest as provided in the applicable award agreement. Share appreciation rights represent a right to receive the fair market value of a share of Common Stock, or, if provided by the Compensation Committee, the right to receive the fair market value of a share of Common Stock in excess of a base value established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Share appreciation rights may generally be settled in cash or by transfer of shares of Common Stock (as may be elected by the participant or the Compensation Committee, as may be provided by the Compensation Committee at grant). The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion and under certain circumstances, permit a participant to receive as settlement of the share appreciation rights installments over a period not to exceed ten years.

 

Phantom Shares

 

Phantom shares, when issued, will reduce the number of shares available for grant under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and will vest as provided in the applicable award agreement. A phantom share represents a right to receive the fair market value of a share of Common Stock, or, if provided by the Compensation Committee, the right to receive the fair market value of a share of Common Stock in excess of a base value established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Phantom shares may generally be settled in cash or by transfer of shares of Common Stock (as may be elected by the participant, in accordance with procedures established by the Compensation Committee, or us, as may be provided by the Compensation Committee at grant).

 

-46-

Dividend Equivalents

 

A dividend equivalent is a right to receive (or have credited) the equivalent value (in cash or shares of Common Stock) of dividends paid on shares of Common Stock otherwise subject to an award. The Compensation Committee may provide that amounts payable with respect to dividend equivalents shall be converted into cash or additional shares of Common Stock. The Compensation Committee will establish all other limitations and conditions of awards of dividend equivalents as it deems appropriate.

 

Other Equity-Based Awards

 

The Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan authorizes the granting of other awards based upon shares of our Common Stock (including the grant of securities convertible into shares of Common Stock and share appreciation rights and LTIP units), subject to terms and conditions established at the time of grant.

 

LTIP units are a special class of partnership interests in our subsidiaries or our operating partnership. Each LTIP unit awarded under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, other than LTIP units that are intended to be “appreciation-only” LTIP units, will be equivalent to an award of one share of Common Stock under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, reducing the number of shares available for other equity awards on a one-for-one basis. We will not receive a tax deduction for the value of any LTIP units granted under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. The vesting period for any LTIP units, if any, will be determined at the time of issuance. Initially, LTIP units whether vested orwill not have full parity with OP units (as defined in our Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of our operating partnership) with respect to liquidating distributions. Under the terms of the LTIP units, our operating partnership will receiverevalue its assets upon the same peroccurrence of certain specified events, and any increase in valuation from the time of the preceding revaluation event until such event will be allocated first to the holders of LTIP units to equalize the capital accounts of such holders with the capital accounts of OP unit profit distributions asholders. Upon equalization of the capital accounts of the holders of LTIP units with other holders of OP units, the LTIP units will achieve full parity with OP units of our operating partnership which profit distribution will generallyfor all purposes, including with respect to liquidating distributions. If such parity is reached, vested LTIP units may be converted into an equal per share distributions on sharesnumber of Common Stock.OP units, and thereafter enjoy all the rights of OP units.

 

Change of Control

 

Upon a Change of Control (as defined in the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan), the Compensation Committee may make such adjustments as it, in its discretion, determines are necessary or appropriate in light of the Change of Control, but only if the Compensation Committee determines that the adjustments do not have a substantial adverse economic impact on the participants (as determined at the time of the adjustments) and may among other things accelerate vesting or forfeiture of unvested awards in connection with such event.

 

-49-

Amendment; Termination

 

If the Amended Plan is approved, weWe will be able to grant awards until the 10th anniversary of the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan’s approval.approval, April 25, 2028. Our board of directors may amend, suspend, alter or discontinue the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan but cannot take any action that would impair the rights of a participant without such participant’s consent. To the extent necessary and desirable (including as required by law or any stock exchange rules), the board of directors must obtain approval of our stockholders for any amendment that would:

 

·other than through adjustment as provided in the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, increase the total number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan; or

 

·change the class of officers, directors, employees, consultants and advisors eligible to participate in the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.

 

The Compensation Committee or our board of directors may amend the terms of any award granted under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, prospectively or retroactively, except that no amendment may adversely affect the rights of any participant with respect to awards previously granted unless such amendments are in connection with applicable laws without his or her consent.

 

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax ConsequencesSecurities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table presents certain information about the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2020:

Plan Category  Number of
securities to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights(1)		   Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights(1)		   Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in the first column of
this table)(2)		 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders  68,500  $11.58   2,499,776 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders  —   —   — 
Total  68,500  $11.58   2,499,776 

_________________

(1)Amounts are under the Original 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.

(2)Amounts are under the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and assume the issuance of only full-value awards.

Non-Qualified Stock OptionsEmployment and Letter Agreements and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements

 

In general, no incomeWe have employment and letter agreements with each of our named executive officers. As described below, these employment and letter agreements provide our named executive officers with, among other things, base salary, bonus and certain payments at, following and/or in connection with certain terminations of employment or a change in control involving the Company. As used below, the terms “Cause,” “Change in Control,” “Disability” and “Good Reason” shall have the respective meanings set forth in the applicable employment or letter agreements, as applicable.

Stuart A. Tanz. Mr. Tanz’s employment agreement, which became effective as of March 21, 2017, provides that he will be recognized byserve as our Chief Executive Officer and President for an option holderinitial term of four years, with automatic renewal for additional one-year terms unless we give prior written notice of non-renewal at the time a non-qualified stock option is granted. Ordinary compensation income will generally be recognized by an option holder, however, at the time a non-qualified stock option is exercised in an amount equalleast six months prior to the excessend of the fair market valuethen current term. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Tanz is entitled to an annual base salary of $850,000, subject to annual review and upward adjustment, and an annual bonus between 0% and 175% of his then annual base salary, as determined in the sole discretion of our board of directors and based on Mr. Tanz’s performance and the performance of the underlying Common Stock on the exercise date over the exercise price. We will generally beCompany. Mr. Tanz is entitled to a deduction for U.S. federal income tax purposesparticipate in the same amount as the amount included in ordinary income by the option holder with respect to his or her non-qualified stock option. Gain or loss on a subsequent saleall of our employee benefit plans and programs or other dispositionwelfare benefit programs as made generally available to other senior executives. Mr. Tanz is also entitled to (i) reimbursement for reasonable business expenses; and (ii) an automobile allowance of the shares acquired upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option will be measured by the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the tax basis of such shares, and will generally be long-term or short-term capital gain depending on the holding period involved. The tax basis of the shares acquired upon the exercise of any non-qualified stock option will be equal to the sum of the exercise price of the non-qualified stock option and the amount included in income with respect to the option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that exercise of the option is permitted other than by cash payment of the exercise price, various special tax rules may apply.$1,500 per month.

 

 -47--50- 

 

Incentive Stock Options

Mr. Tanz’s employment agreement provides that if his employment is terminated (i) by us without Cause, (ii) by Mr. Tanz for Good Reason, (iii) upon non-renewal of the employment term by us, or (iv) by reason of Mr. Tanz’s death or Disability, (and provided Mr. Tanz executes and delivers a general release of claims in favor of the Company) he will be entitled to receive (A) a lump sum payment equal to (i) annual salary, annual bonus and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of termination, and (ii) (x) two times annual salary and (y) two times the average of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years immediately preceding the year of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to two times 50% of Mr. Tanz’s then annual salary), and (B) continuing medical and dental benefits for 24 months under the Company’s health plans and programs applicable to senior executives as he would have received in the absence of such termination. In general, neitheraddition to the grant norforegoing, all outstanding unvested equity-based incentives and awards will vest and become free from restrictions and be exercisable in accordance with their terms. Mr. Tanz’s employment agreement also provides that if his employment is terminated by us without Cause or by Mr. Tanz for Good Reason within the exercise12 month period following a Change in Control, he will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to the benefits listed above, except that he will receive three times annual salary and three times the average of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years immediately preceding the year of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to three times 50% of Mr. Tanz’s then annual salary). To the extent that any of the foregoing payments so made constitutes an incentive stock option“excess parachute payment” under certain tax laws, rules and regulations, we will pay to Mr. Tanz (i) in full as provided above or (ii) in such lesser amount as would result in taxable incomeno portion of any payments or benefits being subject to an option holder or a deduction for us. To receive specialthe excise tax treatment as an incentive stock option under the Internal Revenue Code, as to shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option, an option holder must neither disposewhichever of the shares withinforegoing options (i) or (ii) results in the Mr. Tanz’s receipt, on an after-tax basis, of the greater amount of payments and benefits.

Mr. Tanz has also agreed that he will not (i) compete with us; (ii) solicit our employees, agents or independent contractors; or (iii) solicit or intentionally interfere with our customer or client relationships for the period commencing on the date of the agreement and ending one year following the date upon which Mr. Tanz ceases to be an employee of the Company and our affiliates. His employment agreement also contains customary provisions relating to confidentiality and mutual non-disparagement.

Michael B. Haines. Mr. Haines’s employment agreement, which became effective as of March 21, 2017 provides that he will serve as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary for an initial term of four years, with automatic renewal for additional one-year terms unless we give prior written notice of non-renewal at least six months prior to the end of the then current term. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Haines is entitled to a base salary of $356,000, subject to review and upward adjustment, and an annual bonus between 0% and 125% of his then annual base salary, as determined in the sole discretion of our board of directors and based on Mr. Haines’ performance and the performance of the Company. Mr. Haines is also entitled to participate in all of our employee benefit plans and programs on substantially the same terms and conditions as other senior executives. Mr. Haines is entitled to (i) reimbursement for reasonable business expenses; and (ii) an automobile allowance of $1,500 per month.

Mr. Haines’ employment agreement provides that if Mr. Haines’ employment is terminated by reason of his death or Disability, he will be entitled to receive (i) a lump sum payment equal to (A) annual salary, annual bonus and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of termination, and (B) (x) his annual salary and (y) an amount equal to the average of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years afterimmediately preceding the incentive stock optionyear of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to one times 50% of Mr. Haines’ then annual salary), and (ii) continuing medical and dental benefits for 12 months under the Company’s health plans and programs applicable to senior executives as he would have received in the absence of such termination. In addition to the foregoing, all outstanding unvested equity-based incentives and awards will vest and become free from restrictions and be exercisable in accordance with their terms. Additionally, if Mr. Haines’ employment is granted nor within one year after the transferterminated (A) by us without Cause, (B) by Mr. Haines for Good Reason, (C) upon non-renewal of the shares to the option holder pursuant to exercise of the option. In addition, the option holder must be employedemployment term by us, or (D) by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Haines for Good Reason within the 12-month period following a qualified subsidiary at all times betweenChange in Control, (and provided Mr. Haines executes and delivers a general release of claims in favor of the Company) he will be entitled to receive (i) a lump sum payment equal to (A) annual salary, annual bonus and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of granttermination, and (B) (x) two times annual salary and (y) two times the date threeaverage of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years immediately preceding the year of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to two times 50% of Mr. Haines’ then annual salary), and (ii) continuing medical and dental benefits for 18 months (one yearunder the Company’s health plans and programs applicable to senior executives as he would have received in the caseabsence of disability) before exercisesuch termination. In addition to the foregoing, all outstanding unvested equity-based incentives and awards will vest and become free from restrictions and be exercisable in accordance with their terms. To the extent that any of the option. (Specialforegoing payments so made constitutes an “excess parachute payment” under certain tax laws, rules applyand regulations, we will pay to Mr. Haines (i) in full as provided above or (ii) in such lesser amount as would result in no portion of any payments or benefits being subject to the case of the death of the option holder.) Incentive stock option treatmentexcise tax under the Internal Revenue Code, generally allows the sale of shares of our Common Stock received upon the exercise of an incentive stock option to result in any gain being treated as a capital gain to the option holder, but we will not be entitled to a tax deduction. The exercise of an incentive stock option (if the holding period rules described in this paragraph are satisfied), however, will give rise to income includable by the option holder in his or her alternative minimum taxable income for purposeswhichever of the alternative minimum taxforegoing options (i) or (ii) results in the Mr. Haines’ receipt, on an amount equal to the excessafter-tax basis, of the fair market value of the stock acquired on the date of the exercise of the option over the exercise price.

If the holding period rules noted above are not satisfied, gain recognized on the disposition of the shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option will be characterized as ordinary income. This gain will be equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise. (Special rules may apply to disqualifying dispositions where the amount realized is less than the value at exercise.) We will generally be entitled to a deduction equal to thegreater amount of such gain included by an option holder as ordinary income. Any excess of the amount realized upon such disposition over the fair market value at exercise will generally be long-term or short-term capital gain depending on the holding period involved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if exercise of the option is permitted other than by cash payment of the exercise price, various special tax rules may apply.

Restricted Shares

Unless a holder of Restricted Shares makes an “83(b) election” (as discussed below), there generally will be no tax consequences as a result of the grant of Restricted Shares until the Restricted Shares are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture or are transferable (free of the risk). Dividends paid on unvested shares, if retained by the grantee, will generally be treated as ordinary compensation income for U.S. federal income tax purposes (unless an 83(b) election has been made, as discussed below). Generally, when the restrictions are lifted, the holder will recognize ordinary compensation income,payments and we will be entitled to a deduction, equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares at that time and the amount, if any, paid by the holder for the Restricted Shares. Subsequently realized changes in the value of the shares generally will be treated as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on the length of time the shares are held prior to disposition of the shares. In general terms, if a holder makes an 83(b) election (under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code) upon the award of Restricted Shares, the holder will recognize ordinary compensation income on the date of the award of Restricted Shares, and we will be entitled to a deduction, equal to (i) the fair market value of the Restricted Shares as though the shares were (A) not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture or (B) transferable, minus (ii) the amount, if any, paid for the Restricted Shares. If an 83(b) election is made, there will generally be no tax consequences to the holder upon the lifting of restrictions, and all subsequent appreciation in the Restricted Shares generally would be eligible for capital gains treatment. In the event of a forfeiture after an 83(b) election is made, no deduction or loss will be available, other than with respect to amounts actually paid for the shares.

Share Appreciation Rights

There are no tax consequences to the option holder or to us upon the grant of a share appreciation right. The option holder will generally recognize ordinary compensation income upon the exercise of a share appreciation right in an amount equal to the cash or fair market value of Common Stock received, and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction at that time. Both we and the option holder are required to satisfy the applicable tax withholding requirements, unless the option holder is a non-employee director, where in such case tax withholding would not be required.benefits.

 

 -48--51- 

 

Phantom SharesMr. Haines has also agreed that he will not, for the period commencing on the date of the agreement and ending one year following the date upon which Mr. Haines ceases to be an employee of the Company and our affiliates, (i) compete with us, (ii) solicit our employees, agents or independent contractors, or (iii) solicit or intentionally interfere with our customer or client relationships. Mr. Haines’ employment agreement also contains customary provisions relating to confidentiality and mutual non-disparagement.

 

It is generally expected that any phantom shares would be designedRichard A. Baker. On April 2, 2012, we entered into an amendment to Mr. Baker’s letter agreement with the intention that there will be no tax consequences as a resultus, providing for his transition from Executive Chairman to non-executive Chairman of the granting of a phantom share until payment is made with respect to the phantom share. When payment is made, the participant generally would recognize ordinary compensation income, and we would generally be entitled to a deduction, equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock and cash, as applicable, received upon payment.

Dividend Equivalent Rights

There generally will be no tax consequences as a result of the award of a dividend equivalent right. When payment is made, the holder of the dividend equivalent right generally will recognize ordinary compensation income, and we will be entitled to a deduction, equal to the amount received in respect of the dividend equivalent right.

LTIP Units

There generally will be no tax consequences upon the issuance and vesting of an LTIP unit. Because LTIP units represent special kinds of partnership interests, the tax treatment of LTIP units can be complex and is not easily summarized here.

Consequences if the Amended Plan Proposal is not Approved

If our stockholders do not approve this proposal, we will not adopt the Amended Plan. Our board of directors, believes that it is ineffective following our best interest to have an equity incentive program.2012 Annual Meeting. The Amended Plan provides a meaningful opportunity for employees, non-employee directors, executive officers, consultants and other key personnel and service providers to acquire a proprietary interest in our Company, thereby encouraging those individuals to remain in our service and more closely align their interests with thoseterm of the stockholders.

Ouramended letter agreement was through October 20, 2015. Subject to annual review by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Mr. Baker continues to serve as non-executive Chairman of our board of directors recommends a vote FORpursuant to the approvalterms of the Amended Plan.amended letter agreement.

 

A majorityThe amended letter agreement provides that Mr. Baker will receive annual compensation at a rate of all$275,000. However, such compensation shall not extend beyond the date of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting at whichMr. Baker’s termination as non-executive Chairman of our board directors, unless such termination results from a quorum is present is required for its approval.  Proxies soliciteddecision taken by our board of directors willwithout Mr. Baker’s approval to discontinue his service. Mr. Baker’s base salary is subject to annual review and upward adjustment in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Baker is eligible for an annual bonus to be voted FOR this proposal, unless otherwise instructed.  Abstentionsdetermined in the sole discretion of our board of directors and broker non-votesbased on Mr. Baker’s performance and our performance. Mr. Baker is also entitled to reimbursement for reasonable business expenses and a travel allowance determined annually by the Compensation Committee together with Mr. Baker.

Under the amended letter agreement, Mr. Baker has agreed that during the period he serves as Chairman of our board of directors, and (unless the board of directors elects not to continue Mr. Baker as Chairman without Mr. Baker’s approval to discontinue his service) for a one-year period following such service, he will not be countedbecome a senior executive officer of a U.S.-based, publicly traded, necessity-based, retail REIT nor will he solicit our employees, agents or independent contractors to leave their employment or other service with us. Mr. Baker’s amended letter agreement also contains customary provisions relating to confidentiality and mutual non-disparagement. In addition, under the amended letter agreement, we and Mr. Baker agreed, with effect from October 20, 2012, to terminate his commitment to first offer to us retail properties located in the United States that he may discover prior to taking any interest in such property directly or indirectly for his own account or offering such property to other persons or entities.

Richard K. Schoebel. Mr. Schoebel’s employment agreement, which became effective as votes cast andof March 21, 2017, provides that he will have no effect onserve as our Chief Operating Officer for an initial term of four years, with automatic renewal for additional one-year terms unless we give prior written notice of non-renewal at least six months prior to the resultend of the votethen current term. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Schoebel is entitled to a base salary of $420,000, subject to review and upward adjustment, and an annual bonus between 0% and 125% of his then annual base salary, as determined in the sole discretion of our board of directors and based on this proposal, although they will be considered presentMr. Schoebel’s performance and the performance of the Company. Mr. Schoebel is also entitled to participate in all of our employee benefit plans and programs on substantially the same terms and conditions as other senior executives. Mr. Schoebel is also entitled to (i) reimbursement for the purposereasonable business expenses; and (ii) an automobile allowance of determining the presence of a quorum.

$1,500 per month.

 

 -49--52- 

 

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEMr. Schoebel’s employment agreement provides that if Mr. Schoebel’s employment is terminated by reason of his death or Disability, he will be entitled to receive (i) a lump sum payment equal to, (A) annual salary, annual bonus and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of termination, and (B) (x) his annual salary and (y) an amount equal to the average of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years immediately preceding the year of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to one times 50% of Mr. Schoebel’s then annual salary), and (ii) continuing medical and dental benefits for 12 months under the Company’s health plans and programs applicable to senior executives as he would have received in the absence of such termination. In addition to the foregoing, all outstanding unvested equity-based incentives and awards will vest and become free from restrictions and be exercisable in accordance with their terms. Additionally, if Mr. Schoebel’s employment is terminated (A) by us without Cause, (B) by Mr. Schoebel for Good Reason, (C) upon non-renewal of the employment term by us, or (D) by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Schoebel for Good Reason within the 12-month period following a Change in Control, (and provided Mr. Schoebel executes and delivers a general release of claims in favor of the Company) he will be entitled to receive (i) a lump sum payment equal to (A) annual salary, annual bonus and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of termination, and (B) (x) two times annual salary and (y) two times the average of the annual bonuses awarded for the last two years immediately preceding the year of termination (if no annual bonus was awarded for the year (or two years) preceding the year of termination, a minimum bonus equal to two times 50% of Mr. Schoebel’s then annual salary), and (ii) continuing medical and dental benefits for 18 months under the Company’s health plans and programs applicable to senior executives as he would have received in the absence of such termination. In addition to the foregoing, all outstanding unvested equity-based incentives and awards will vest and become free from restrictions and be exercisable in accordance with their terms. To the extent that any of the foregoing payments so made constitutes an “excess parachute payment” under certain tax laws, rules and regulations, we will pay to Mr. Schoebel (i) in full as provided above or (ii) in such lesser amount as would result in no portion of any payments or benefits being subject to the excise tax under the Internal Revenue Code, whichever of the foregoing options (i) or (ii) results in the Mr. Schoebel’s receipt, on an after-tax basis, of the greater amount of payments and benefits.

 

Section 16(a)Mr. Schoebel has also agreed that he will not, for the period commencing on the date of the agreement and ending one year following the date upon which Mr. Schoebel ceases to be an employee of the Company and our affiliates, (i) compete with us, (ii) solicit our employees, agents or independent contractors, or (iii) solicit or intentionally interfere with our customer or client relationships. Mr. Schoebel’s employment agreement also contains customary provisions relating to confidentiality and mutual non-disparagement.

Potential Payments upon a Change in Control or Termination

The following table sets forth the cash amounts, accelerated vesting of equity awards and other payments and benefits that our named executive officers would be entitled to receive under various circumstances pursuant to the terms of the Original 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, and the grant agreements made under the Original 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and the Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and their respective employment agreements in the event that the employment termination scenarios described above under “—Employment and Letter Agreements and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements” were to have occurred on December 31, 2020. The actual amounts that would be paid on any termination of employment can only be determined at the time of any actual separation from the Company.

-53-

Event Stuart A. Tanz Michael B. Haines Richard A. Baker Richard K. Schoebel

By Company without Cause,

by Employee for Good Reason or upon non-renewal of employment by the Company, and with no Change in Control:(*)

                
Cash Severance(1)  4,068,750   1,544,238   —   1,836,313 
Equity Awards(4)  7,119,062   2,216,955   777,866   2,430,875 
Other Benefits(5)  55,460   42,207   —   38,688 
Total  11,243,272   3,803,400   777,866   4,305,876 
                 
By Company without Cause, by Employee for Good Reason, and following a Change in Control:(*)                
Cash Severance(2)  6,103,125   1,544,238   —   1,836,313 
Equity Awards(4)  7,119,062   2,216,955   777,866   2,430,875 
Other Benefits(5)  55,460   42,207   —   38,688 

Total(6)

  13,277,647   3,803,400   777,866   4,305,876 
                 
Death or Disability:(*)                
Cash Severance(3)  4,068,750   772,119   —   918,157 
Equity Awards(4)  7,119,062   2,216,955   777,866   2,430,875 
Other Benefits(5)  55,460   28,138   —   25,792 
Total  11,243,272   3,017,212   777,866   3,374,824 
                 
By Company with Cause or by Employee without Good Reason: (*)                
Cash Severance  —   —   —   — 
Equity Awards  —   —   —   — 
Other Benefits  —   —   —   — 
Total  —   —   —   — 

_____________________

(*)All amounts are in dollars. All amounts assume any accrued base salary, bonus and other benefits have been paid up to the date of calculation.

(1)Reflects the aggregate of (i) 2.0 times base salary (using base salaries as of the date of this Proxy Statement) and (ii) 2.0 times the average of the cash bonuses earned for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

(2)Reflects the aggregate of (i) 2.0 times (3.0 times for Mr. Tanz) base salary (using base salaries as of the date of this Proxy Statement) and (ii) 2.0 times (3.0 times for Mr. Tanz) the average of the cash bonuses earned for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

(3)Reflects the aggregate of (i) 1.0 times (2.0 times for Mr. Tanz) base salary (using base salaries as of the date of this Proxy Statement) and (ii) 1.0 times (2.0 times for Mr. Tanz) the average of the cash bonuses earned for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

(4)Reflects the number of shares received pursuant to equity awards that had not vested as of December 31, 2020 (see “—Compensation of Executive Officers—Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2019”) multiplied by $13.39 per share, the closing price of the Common Stock reported on NASDAQ on December 31, 2020 (the last trading day of the year). For unvested performance-based equity awards subject to “threshold,” “target,” “high,” “maximum,” or “exceptional” bonus opportunity levels, amounts have been calculated assuming a “target” bonus opportunity level payout.

(5)Reflects continuing medical and dental benefits for 18 months (24 months for Mr. Tanz, and in the case of Messrs. Haines and Schoebel in the event of death or disability, 12 months) calculated using the amounts received during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

(6)To the extent that any of the payments made upon a change in control constitute an “excess parachute payment” under certain tax laws, rules and regulations, we will pay (i) the total in full or (ii) such lesser amount as would result in no portion of any payments or benefits being subject to such excise tax, whichever of the foregoing options (i) or (ii) results in the receipt, on an after-tax basis, of the greater amount of payments and benefits.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors: Laura H. Pomerantz (Chair), Michael J. Indiveri and Charles J. Persico. No member of the Compensation Committee is or was an employee or officer of the Company or had any relationships requiring disclosure under the rules and regulations of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officersAct. There are no Compensation Committee interlocks and holders of more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (“10% Holders”) to file with the SEC and NASDAQ initial reports of ownership and reports of changesno insider participation in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company.  Directors, executive officers and 10% Holderscompensation decisions that are required by the SEC’s regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms and amendments thereto filed during any given year.

Based on the review of copies of the Section 16(a) reports and amendments thereto furnished to us and/or written representations from our directors, executive officers and 10% Holders that no other reports were required to be filed, we believe that forreported under the year ended December 31, 2017 our directors, executive officersrules and 10% Holders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them withregulations of the exception noted below:Exchange Act.

 

A Form 4 for two transactions was filed late for Charles J. Persico, one of our directors.

-54-

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

Other than the transactions referred to herein, since the beginning of our last fiscal year, we have not been a party to any transaction or proposed transaction with any related person who is (i) one of our directors or executive officers, (ii) a director nominee, (iii) a beneficial owner of more than 5% of Common Stock or (iv) any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons that involves an amount exceeding $120,000 and in which any such related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -50--55- 

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table sets forth information as of the date of this Proxy Statement regarding the beneficial ownership of Common Stock by (i) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock, (ii) our named executive officers, (iii) our directors and director nominees and (iv) all of our directors, director nominees and named executive officers as a group.

 

 Common Stock Beneficially Owned   Common Stock Beneficially Owned   

Name and Business Address(1)

 

Shares(2)(3)

 

Shares Subject to Options or Warrants(4)

 Total Percent of Class  Shares(2)(3)   Shares
Subject to
Options or
Warrants(4)		   Total   Percent of
Class		 
Directors and Officers(2)                                
Richard A. Baker  260,617(5)  50,000   310,617   *   296,725(5)  —   296,725   * 
Michael B. Haines  152,601   25,000   177,601   *   260,509   —   260,509   * 
Angela K. Ho  7,468   —   7,468   * 
Michael J. Indiveri  63,275   –   63,275   *   74,302   —   74,302   * 
Edward H. Meyer  74,875   –   74,875   *   74,302   —   74,302   * 
Lee S. Neibart  98,725(5)  –   98,725   *   118,152(5)  —   118,152   * 
Charles J. Persico  24,875   –   24,875   *   31,027   —   31,027   * 
Laura H. Pomerantz  54,875   –   54,875   *   61,027   —   61,027   * 
Richard K. Schoebel  234,290   70,000   304,290   *   370,445   —   370,445   * 
Stuart A. Tanz  1,395,037   100,000   1,495,037   1.3%  1,745,123   —   1,745,123   1.5%
Eric S. Zorn  52,875   –   52,875   

*

   101,414   —   101,414   

*

 
All directors and named executive officers as a group (10 persons)  2,412,045   245,000   2,657,045   2.4%  3,140,494   —   3,140,494   2.7%
                                
5% or more beneficial owners                                

Entities affiliated with Blackrock Inc.(6)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

  17,771,594   –   17,771,594   16.2%

Entities affiliated with Invesco Ltd.(7)

1555 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1800

Atlanta, GA 30309

  5,862,550   –   5,862,550   5.3%

Entities affiliated with The Vanguard Group, Inc.(8)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

  17,635,674   –   17,635,674   16.07%

Vanguard Specialized Funds – Vanguard REIT Index Fund(9)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

  6,858,917   –   6,858,917   6.25%

Entities affiliated with Blackrock, Inc.(6)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

  21,172,289   —   21,172,289   17.9%

Entities affiliated with The Vanguard Group, Inc.(7)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

  17,590,438   —   17,590,438   14.91%

Entities affiliated with Invesco Ltd.(8)

1555 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1800

Atlanta, GA 30309

  6,577,639   —   6,577,639   5.6%

Entities affiliated with State Street Corporation(9)

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

  5,974,415   —   5,974,415   5.06%

_____________________________________

(*)Represents less than 1% of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock.

 

(1)The business address of each director and named executive officer is c/o Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92130.

 

(2)Each director and named executive officer has sole voting and investment power with respect to these shares, except that (i) the Indiveri Group LLC, a limited liability company, holds 8,400 shares whose interests are owned 50% by Mr. Indiveri and 50% by his spouse and 20,000(ii) all of the shares of Common Stockheld by Mr. Schoebel are held by the Edward H. MeyerSchoebel Family Trust of whichdated June 7, 2013 whose interests are owned 50% by Mr. Meyer is a Trustee.Schoebel and 50% by his spouse.

 

(3)Includes unvested Restricted Shares granted to our named executive officers and directors as follows: Mr. Baker – 13,23024,083 Restricted Shares subject to time-based vesting; Mr. Haines – 55,46468,640 Restricted Shares subject to time-based vesting; Mr. Tanz – 178,954224,325 Restricted Shares subject to time-based vesting; Mr. Schoebel – 60,98375,262 Restricted Shares subject to time-based vesting; Ms. Ho – 7,468; Mr. Indiveri – 5,0127,468 Restricted Shares subject to time-based vesting; Mr. Meyer – 5,0127,468 Restricted Shares subject to time-based vesting; Mr. Neibart – 5,0127,468 Restricted Shares subject to time-based vesting; Mr. Persico – 5,0127,468 Restricted Shares subject to time-based vesting; Ms. Pomerantz – 5,0127,468 Restricted Shares subject to time-based vesting; and Mr. Zorn – 5,0127,468 Restricted Shares subject to time-based vesting.  Excludes unvested Restricted Shares granted to our named executive officers as follows:  Mr. Baker – 34,530 Restricted Shares subject to performance-based vesting; Mr. Tanz – 252,872 Restricted Shares subject to performance-based vesting; Mr. Haines – 77,748 Restricted Shares subject to performance-based vesting; and Mr. Schoebel – 85,675 Restricted Shares subject to performance-based vesting.

Excludes unvested Restricted Shares granted to our named executive officers as follows: Mr. Baker – 24,095 Restricted Shares subject to performance-based vesting; Mr. Tanz – 225,898 Restricted Shares subject to performance-based vesting; Mr. Haines – 68,672 Restricted Shares subject to performance-based vesting; and Mr. Schoebel – 75,299 Restricted Shares subject to performance-based vesting.

Excludes unvested LTIP units granted to our named executive officers as follows: Mr. Baker – 11,723 LTIP units subject to performance-based vesting; Mr. Tanz – 105,510 LTIP units subject to performance-based vesting; Mr. Haines – 33,411 LTIP units subject to performance-based vesting; and Mr. Schoebel – 36,635 LTIP units subject to performance-based vesting.

 

(4)For purposes of this table, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of shares of Common Stock if that person has the right to acquire such shares within 60 days of the Record Date by the exercise of any Options or warrants. Options or warrants held by a person are deemed to have been exercised for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by such person, but shall not be deemed to have been exchanged or exercised for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by any other person.

 

-56-

(5)Includes 175,568 shares received by Mr. Baker and 68,850 shares received by Mr. Neibart as part of a pro rata distribution from NRDC Capital Management, LLC, of which William L. Mack, Robert C. Baker, and Messrs. Baker and Neibart were the sole members and managers. In prior reports, Messrs. Baker and Neibart each reported indirect beneficial ownership of 688,500 shares.

 

(6)On its Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 6) filed with the SEC on January 19, 2018,25, 2021, Blackrock, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 17,480,20220,868,037 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it, shared voting or shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it, sole dispositive power with respect to 17,771,59421,172,289 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it and aggregate beneficial ownership of 17,771,59421,172,289 shares of Common Stock. The Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 6) reports a beneficial ownership percentage of shares of Common Stock of 16.2%17.9%.

 

-51-

(7)On its Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 9)11) filed with the SEC on February 13, 2018,10, 2021, the Vanguard Group, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 0 shares of Common Stock, shared voting power with respect to 360,767 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 17,133,105 shares of Common Stock, shared dispositive power with respect to 457,333 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it and aggregate beneficial ownership of 17,590,438 shares of Common Stock. The Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 11) reports a beneficial ownership percentage of shares of Common Stock of 14.91%.

(8)On its Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 15) filed with the SEC on February 12, 2021, Invesco Ltd. reported sole voting power with respect to 4,172,1744,147,065 shares of Common Stock, shared voting or shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it, sole dispositive power with respect to 5,862,5506,577,639 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it and aggregate beneficial ownership of 5,862,5506,577,639 shares of Common Stock. The Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 9)15) reports a beneficial ownership percentage of shares of Common Stock of 5.3%5.6%.

 

(8)(9)On its Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 8) filed with the SEC on February 12, 2018, the Vanguard Group, Inc.10, 2021, State Street Corporation reported sole voting power with respect to 253,6400 shares of Common Stock, shared voting power with respect to 143,6935,275,119 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 17,370,8400 shares of Common Stock, shared dispositive power with respect to 264,8345,974,415 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it and aggregate beneficial ownership of 17,635,6745,974,415 shares of Common Stock. The Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 8) reports a beneficial ownership percentage of shares of Common Stock of 16.07%.

(9)On its Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 8) filed with the SEC on February 2, 2018, Vanguard Specialized Funds – Vanguard REIT Index Fund reported sole voting power with respect to 6,858,917 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it, shared voting power and sole or shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it, and aggregate beneficial ownership of 6,858,917 shares of Common Stock.  The Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 8) reports a beneficial ownership percentage of shares of Common Stock of 6.25%5.06%.

 

-52-

OTHER MATTERS

 

Our board of directors knows of no other business to be presented at the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof. The proxies for the Annual Meeting confer discretionary authority on the persons named therein as proxy holders to vote on any matter proposed by stockholders for consideration at the Annual Meeting. As to any other business which may properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxy holders on your proxy card will vote the shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies in their discretion.

 

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

Any stockholder intending to present a proposal at our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and have the proposal included in the proxy statement and proxy card for such meeting (pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act) must, in addition to complying with the applicable laws and regulations governing submissions of such proposals, submit the proposal in writing to us no later than November 26, 2018,2021, and must otherwise be in compliance with the requirements of the SEC’s proxy rules.

 

Our stockholders of record who comply with the current advanced notice procedures set forth in our Bylaws and outlined under this “Submission of Stockholder Proposals” section may nominate director candidates for election to our board of directors.  Stockholderdirectors or propose other business at the annual meeting. To be timely, such stockholder nominations of director candidates at our annual meetingor proposals of stockholdersother business must be received by our Secretary not earlier than the 150th day nor later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, in the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, to be timely, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the 150th day prior to the date of such annual meeting and notnor later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the later of the 120th day prior to the date of such annual meeting, as originally convened, or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. The public announcement of a postponement or adjournment of an annual meeting will not commence a new time period for the giving of a stockholder’s notice as described above. Accordingly, to submit a director candidate for consideration for nomination or propose other business for inclusion at our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholders must submit the recommendation or proposal, in writing, by November 26, 2018,2021, but in no event earlier than October 26, 2018.27, 2021. The written notice must set forth the information required by our Bylaws. The advanced notice procedures set forth in our Bylaws do not affect the right of stockholders to request the inclusion of proposals in our proxy statement pursuant to SEC rules.

 

-57-

Any such nomination or proposal should be sent to Michael B. Haines, our Secretary, at Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92130, and, to the extent applicable, must include the information required by our Bylaws.

 

Our board of directors and our management do not know of noany other matters or business to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If, however, any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournmentspostponements or postponementsadjournments thereof, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote such proxy in accordance with their discretion on any such matters. The persons named in the enclosed proxy may also, if they deem it advisable, vote such proxy to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time.

 

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

 

The SEC permits companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single set of proxy materials (i.e., the proxy statement and annual report) addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.

 

A number of brokers with account holders who are our stockholders will be “householding” our proxy materials. A single set of proxy materials may be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing the same address unless contrary instructions have been received from the impacted stockholders. Once a stockholder has received notice from its broker that they will be “householding” communications to such stockholder’s address, “householding” will continue until such stockholder revokes consent to “householding” or is notified otherwise. If, at any time, a stockholder no longer wishes to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive a separate set of our proxy materials, such stockholder should so notify us by directing written requests to: Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92130, Attn: Michael B. Haines, our Chief Financial Officer; or by calling investor relations at 858-255-4913. In addition, if so requested, we will also undertake to promptly deliver a separate set of proxy materials to any stockholder for whom such proxy materials were subject to “householding.” Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of our proxy materials at their address and would like to request “householding” of their communications should contact us, as specified above, or their respective brokers.

 

-53-

MISCELLANEOUS

 

We are bearing all costs associated with the solicitation of proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting. This solicitation is being made primarily through the internetInternet and by mail, but may also be made by our directors, executive officers and employees by telephone, telegraph, facsimile transmission, electronic transmission, internet,Internet, mail or personal interview. No additional compensation will be given to our directors, executive officers or employees for this solicitation. We will request brokers and nominees who hold shares of Common Stock in their names to furnish proxy materials to beneficial owners of such shares and will reimburse such brokers and nominees for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners.

 

A COPY OF OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (FILED WITH THE SEC AND NASDAQ), WHICH CONTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT US, IS AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE TO ANY STOCKHOLDER UPON WRITTEN REQUEST. REQUESTS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO MICHAEL B. HAINES, OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, AT OUR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES AT RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP., 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92130.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors
 
Stuart A. Tanz
President and Chief Executive Officer

By Order of the Board of Directors

Stuart A. Tanz

President and Chief Executive Officer

San Diego, California

March 26, 20182021

 

 -54--58- 

 

APPENDIX A

Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan

 

 

 

Appendix A - 1

AMENDED AND RESTATED

RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.

2009 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

1.                   PURPOSE. The Plan is intended to provide incentives to directors, officers, advisors, consultants, key employees, and others expected to provide significant services to the Company, its Subsidiaries, and its affiliates, to encourage a proprietary interest in the Company, to encourage such key personnel to remain in the service of the Company and the other Participating Companies, to attract new personnel with outstanding qualifications, and to afford additional incentives to others to increase their efforts in providing significant services to the Company and the other Participating Companies. In furtherance thereof, the Plan permits awards of equity-based incentives to key personnel, employees, officers and directors of, and certain other providers of services to, the Company or any other Participating Company.

2.                   DEFINITIONS. As used in this Plan, the following definitions apply:

“Act” shall mean the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

“Award Agreement” shall mean a written agreement evidencing a Grant pursuant to the Plan.

“Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.

“Cause” shall mean, unless otherwise provided in the Grantee’s Award Agreement, (i) engaging in (A) willful or gross misconduct or (B) willful or gross neglect, (ii) repeatedly failing to adhere to the directions of superiors or the Board or the written policies and practices of the Company, the Subsidiaries, or any of their respective affiliates, (iii) the commission of a felony or a crime of moral turpitude, or any crime involving the Company, the Subsidiaries, or any of their respective affiliates, (iv) fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement or material or repeated insubordination, (v) a material breach of the Grantee’s employment agreement (if any) with the Company, the Subsidiaries, or any of their respective affiliates (other than a termination of employment by the Grantee), or (vi) any illegal act detrimental to the Company, the Subsidiaries, or any of their respective affiliates, all as determined by the Committee.

“Change of Control” means, unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, the happening of any of the following:

(i)any “person,” including a “group” (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, but excluding the Company, any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Company, any trustee, fiduciary or other person or entity holding securities under any employee benefit plan or trust of the Company or any such entity, and, with respect to any particular Participant, the Participant and any “group” (as such term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) of which the Participant is a member), is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13(d)(3) under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 50% or more of either (A) the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities or (B) the then outstanding Shares (in either such case other than as a result of an acquisition of securities directly from the Company); or

(ii)the consummation of any consolidation or merger of the Company where the shareholders of the Company, immediately prior to the consolidation or merger, would not, immediately after the consolidation or merger, beneficially own (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, shares representing in the aggregate 50% or more of the combined voting power of the securities of the corporation issuing cash or securities in the consolidation or merger (or of its ultimate parent corporation, if any); or

(iii)there shall occur (A) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of transactions contemplated or arranged by any party as a single plan) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, other than a sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to an entity, at least 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of which are owned by “persons” (as defined above) in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to such sale or (B) the approval by shareholders of the Company of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company; or

Appendix A - 2

(iv)the members of the Board at the beginning of any consecutive 24-calendar-month period (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease for any reason other than due to death to constitute at least a majority of the members of the Board; provided that any Director whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders, was approved or ratified by a vote of at least a majority of the members of the Board then still in office who were members of the Board at the beginning of such 24-calendar-month period, shall be deemed to be an Incumbent Director.

Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in an Award Agreement or otherwise, in the event that the timing of payments in respect of any Grant (that would otherwise be considered “deferred compensation” subject to Section 409A of the Code) would be accelerated upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, no such acceleration shall be permitted unless the event giving rise to the Change of Control satisfies the definition of a change in the ownership or effective control of a corporation, or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of a corporation pursuant to Section 409A of the Code.

“Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

“Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Company as appointed by the Board in accordance with Section 4 of the Plan; provided, however, that the Committee shall at all times consist solely of persons who, at the time of their appointment, each qualified as a “Non-Employee Director” under Rule 16b-3(b)(3)(i) promulgated under the Exchange Act and, to the extent that relief from the limitation of Section 162(m) of the Code is sought, as an “Outside Director” under Section 1.162-27(e)(3)(i) of the Treasury Regulations.

“Common Stock” shall mean the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, either currently existing or authorized hereafter.

“Company” shall mean Retail Opportunities Investment Corp., a Delaware corporation.

“DER” shall mean a right awarded under Section 11 of the Plan to receive (or have credited) the equivalent value (in cash or Shares) of dividends paid on Common Stock.

“Disability” shall mean, unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the Grantee’s Award Agreement, the occurrence of an event which would entitle the Grantee to the payment of disability income under an approved long-term disability income plan or a long-term disability as determined by the Committee in its absolute discretion pursuant to any other standard as may be adopted by the Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no circumstances or condition shall constitute a Disability to the extent that, if it were, a 20% tax would be imposed under Section 409A of the Code; provided that, in such a case, the event or condition shall continue to constitute a Disability to the maximum extent possible (e.g., if applicable, in respect of vesting without an acceleration of distribution) without causing the imposition of such 20% tax.

“Eligible Persons” shall mean officers, directors, advisors, personnel and employees of the Participating Companies and other persons expected to provide significant services (of a type expressly approved by the Committee as covered services for these purposes) to one or more of the Participating Companies. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, for a Grant with respect to Shares, “Eligible Persons” shall be limited to persons who may be offered securities on Form S-8. For purposes of the Plan, a consultant, advisor, vendor, customer or other provider of significant services to the Company or any other Participating Company shall be deemed to be an Eligible Person, but will be eligible to receive Grants (but in no event Incentive Stock Options), only after a finding by the Committee in its discretion that the value of the services rendered or to be rendered to the Participating Company is at least equal to the value of the Grants being awarded.

“Employee” shall mean an individual, including an officer of a Participating Company, who is employed (within the meaning of Code Section 3401 and the regulations thereunder) by the Participating Company.

“Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“Exercise Price” shall mean the price per Share of Common Stock, determined by the Board or the Committee, at which an Option may be exercised.

“Fair Market Value” shall mean the value of one share of Common Stock, determined as follows:

Appendix A - 3

(i)If the Shares are then listed on a national stock exchange, the closing sales price per Share on the exchange for the last preceding date on which there was a sale of Shares on such exchange, as determined by the Committee.

(ii)If the Shares are not then listed on a national stock exchange but are then traded on an over-the-counter market or are quoted in an inter-dealer quotation system on a last sale basis, the average of the closing bid and asked prices for the Shares in such over-the-counter market or an inter-dealer quotation system for the last preceding date on which there was a sale of such Shares in such market, as determined by the Committee.

(iii)If neither (i) nor (ii) applies, such value as the Committee in its discretion may in good faith determine. Notwithstanding the foregoing, where the Shares are listed or traded, the Committee may make discretionary determinations in good faith where the Shares have not been traded for 10 trading days.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any “stock right” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, Fair Market Value shall not be less than the “fair market value” of the shares of Common Stock determined in accordance with the final regulations promulgated under Section 409A of the Code.

“Full Value Award” shall mean any Grant (other than an Option or any other Grant for which the Grantee pays an exercise price equal to the intrinsic value of the Grant (whether directly or by foregoing a right to receive a payment from the Company)), including any Restricted Stock, Phantom Share, DER, or Long Term Incentive Unit (other than a Long Term Incentive Unit that is intended to be an “appreciation-only” Long Term Incentive Unit, as described in Section 12), in each case, to the extent settled in Shares without payment of the grant-date intrinsic value by the Grantee.

“Fungible Unit” shall mean the measuring unit used to determine the number of Shares by which the Share Limit will be debited or credited in connection with the grants and forfeitures of different types of Grants under the Plan.

“Fungible Unit Limit” shall have the meaning provided in Section 6(a) hereof.

“Grant” shall mean the issuance of an Incentive Stock Option, Non-qualified Stock Option, Restricted Stock, Phantom Share, DER, or other equity-based grant, as contemplated herein or any combination thereof as applicable to an Eligible Person. The Committee will determine the eligibility of personnel, employees, officers, directors and others expected to provide significant services to the Participating Companies based on, among other factors, the position and responsibilities of such individuals, the nature and value to the Participating Company of such individuals’ accomplishments and potential contribution to the success of the Participating Company whether directly or through its subsidiaries.

“Grantee” shall mean an Eligible Person to whom Options, Restricted Stock, Phantom Shares, DERs, or other equity-based awards are granted hereunder.

“Incentive Stock Option” shall mean an Option of the type described in Section 422(b) of the Code issued to an Employee of (i) the Company, or (ii) a “subsidiary corporation” or a “parent corporation” as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code.

“Long Term Incentive Unit” shall mean a grant made under Section 12 of the Plan of an interest in a Subsidiary or an operating partnership that is affiliated with the Company, and which may be intended to be treated as a “profits interest” within the meaning of Revenue Procedure 93-27, 1993-2 C.B. 343 and Revenue Procedure 2001-43, 2001-2 C.B. 191, which may include an “appreciation only” interest in an operating partnership, as described in Section 12.

“Non-Employee Director” means a member of the Board who is not an Employee.

“Non-qualified Stock Option” shall mean an Option not described in Section 422(b) of the Code.

“Option” shall mean any option, whether an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-qualified Stock Option, to purchase, at a price and for the term fixed by the Committee in accordance with the Plan, and subject to such other limitations and restrictions in the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, a number of Shares determined by the Committee.

Appendix A - 4

“Optionee” shall mean any Eligible Person to whom an Option is granted, or the Successors of the Optionee, as the context so requires.

“Participating Companies” shall mean the Company, the Subsidiaries, and any of their respective affiliates.

“Performance Goals” has the meaning set forth in Section 13.

“Phantom Share” shall mean a right, pursuant to the Plan, of the Grantee to payment of the Phantom Share Value.

“Phantom Share Value”, per Phantom Share, shall mean the Fair Market Value of a Share or, if so provided by the Committee, such Fair Market Value to the extent in excess of a base value established by the Committee at the time of grant.

��Plan” shall mean the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, as set forth herein, and as the same may from time to time be amended.

“Purchase Price” shall mean the Exercise Price times the number of Shares with respect to which an Option is exercised.

“Qualifying Director” means a person who is with respect to actions intended to obtain an exemption from Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act.

“Restricted Stock” shall mean an award of Shares that are subject to restrictions hereunder.

“Retirement” shall mean, unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the Grantee’s Award Agreement, the Termination of Service (other than for Cause) of a Grantee:

(i)on or after the Grantee’s attainment of age 65;

(ii)on or after the Grantee’s attainment of age 55 with five consecutive years of service with the Participating Companies; or

(iii)as determined by the Committee in its absolute discretion pursuant to such other standard as may be adopted by the Committee.

“Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933.

“Share Limit” shall have the meaning provided in Section 6(a) hereof.

“Shares” shall mean shares of Common Stock of the Company, adjusted in accordance with Section 15 of the Plan (if applicable).

“Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation, partnership, limited liability company or other entity at least 50% of the economic interest in the equity of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company or by another subsidiary.

“Successors of the Optionee” shall mean the legal representative of the estate of a deceased Optionee or the person or persons who shall acquire the right to exercise an Option by bequest or inheritance or by reason of the death of the Optionee.

“Termination of Service” shall mean the time when the employee-employer relationship or directorship, or other service relationship (sufficient to constitute service as an Eligible Person), between the Grantee and the Participating Companies is terminated for any reason, with or without Cause, including, but not limited to, any termination by resignation, discharge, death or Retirement; provided, however, Termination of Service shall not include a termination where there is a simultaneous continuation of service of the Grantee (sufficient to constitute service as an Eligible Person) with a Participating Company. The Committee, in its absolute discretion, shall determine the effects of all matters and questions relating to Termination of Service, including, but not limited to, the question of whether any Termination of Service was for Cause and all questions of whether particular leaves of absence constitute Terminations of Service. For this purpose, the service relationship shall be treated as continuing intact while the Grantee is on military leave, sick leave or other bona fide leave of absence (to be determined in the discretion of the Committee).

Appendix A - 5

3.                   EFFECTIVE DATE. The original effective date of the Plan was the date of closing of the transactions contemplated by the Framework Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2009, by and between NRDC Acquisition and NRDC Capital Management, LLC. The Plan is amended and restated effective April 25, 2018 (the “Restatement Date”). Grants made under the Plan before the Restatement Date will be subject to the terms of the Plan and the limits thereunder as in effect before the Restatement Date, and Grants made under the Plan on and after the Restatement Date will be subject to the terms of the Plan and the limits hereunder as reflected in this restated Plan document. The Plan shall terminate on, and no Grant shall be made hereunder on or after, the 10-year anniversary of the Restatement Date; provided, however, that the Board may at any time prior to that date terminate the Plan.

4.                   ADMINISTRATION.

(a)                 Membership on Committee. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee appointed by the Board. If no Committee is designated by the Board to act for those purposes, the full Board shall have the rights and responsibilities of the Committee hereunder and under the Award Agreements.

(b)                 Committee Meetings. The acts of a majority of the members present at any meeting of the Committee at which a quorum is present, or acts approved in writing by a majority of the entire Committee, shall be the acts of the Committee for purposes of the Plan. If and to the extent applicable, no member of the Committee may act as to matters under the Plan specifically relating to such member.

(c)                 Grant of Awards.

(i)                   The Committee shall from time to time at its discretion select the Eligible Persons who are to be issued Grants and determine the number and type of Grants to be issued under any Award Agreement to an Eligible Person. In particular, the Committee shall (A) determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of any Grants awarded hereunder (including, but not limited to the performance goals and periods applicable to the award of Grants); (B) determine the time or times when and the manner and condition in which each Option shall be exercisable and the duration of the exercise period; (C) determine or impose other conditions to the Grant or exercise of Options under the Plan as it may deem appropriate; (D) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances Grants may be settled in, or exercised for, cash, Shares, other securities, other Grants or other property, or canceled, forfeited, or suspended and the method or methods by which Grants may be settled, exercised, canceled, forfeited, or suspended; (E) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances the delivery of cash, Shares, other securities, other Grants or other property and other amounts payable with respect to a Grant shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the Grantee or of the Committee; (F) interpret, administer, reconcile any inconsistency in, correct any defect in and/or supply any omission in the Plan and any instrument or agreement relating to, or Grants awarded under, the Plan; (G) establish, amend, suspend, or waive any rules and regulations and appoint such agents as the Committee shall deem appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan; (H) adopt sub-plans; and (I) make any other determination and take any other action that the Committee deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan. The Committee may establish such rules, regulations and procedures for the administration of the Plan as it deems appropriate, determine the extent, if any, to which Options, Phantom Shares, Shares (whether or not Shares of Restricted Stock), DERs, or other equity-based awards, shall be forfeited (whether or not such forfeiture is expressly contemplated hereunder), and take any other actions and make any other determinations or decisions that it deems necessary or appropriate in connection with the Plan or the administration or interpretation thereof. The Committee shall also cause each Option to be designated as an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-qualified Stock Option, except that no Incentive Stock Options may be granted to an Eligible Person who is not an Employee of the Company or a “subsidiary corporation” or a “parent corporation” as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code. The Grantee shall take whatever additional actions and execute whatever additional documents the Committee may in its reasonable judgment deem necessary or advisable in order to carry or effect one or more of the obligations or restrictions imposed on the Grantee pursuant to the express provisions of the Plan and the Award Agreement. DERs will be exercisable separately or together with other Grants (subject to the provisions of Section 11), and paid in cash or other consideration at such times and in accordance with such rules, as the Committee shall determine in its discretion. Unless expressly provided hereunder, the Committee, with respect to any Grant, may exercise its discretion hereunder at the time of the award or thereafter. The Committee shall have the right and responsibility to interpret the Plan and the interpretation and construction by the Committee of any provision of the Plan or of any Grant thereunder, including, without limitation, in the event of a dispute, shall be final and binding on all Grantees and other persons to the maximum extent permitted by law. Without limiting the generality of Section 24, no member of the Committee shall be liable for any action or determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan or any Grant hereunder.

Appendix A - 6

(ii)                 Notwithstanding clause (i) of this Section 4(c), any award under the Plan to an Eligible Person who is a member of the Committee shall be made by the full Board, but for these purposes the directors of the Corporation who are on the Committee shall be required to be recused in respect of such awards and shall not be permitted to vote.

(iii)                Except to the extent prohibited by applicable law or the applicable rules and regulations of any securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system on which the securities of the Company are listed or traded, the Committee may allocate all or any portion of its responsibilities and powers to any one or more of its members and may delegate all or any part of its responsibilities and powers to any person or persons selected by it. Any such allocation or delegation may be revoked by the Committee at any time. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee may delegate to one or more officers of any of the Company or its Subsidiaries, the authority to act on behalf of the Committee with respect to any matter, right, obligation, or election which is the responsibility of, or which is allocated to, the Committee herein, and which may be so delegated as a matter of law, except for awards of Grants to Non-Employee Directors. Notwithstanding the foregoing in this Section 4(c), it is intended that any action under the Plan intended to qualify for the exemptions provided by Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act related to persons who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, will be taken only by the Board or by a committee or subcommittee of two (2) or more Qualifying Directors. However, the fact that any member of such committee or subcommittee shall fail to qualify as a Qualifying Director shall not invalidate any action that is otherwise valid under the Plan.

(iv)               Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Plan, the Board may, in its sole discretion, at any time and from time to time, make Grants and administer the Plan with respect to such Grants. Any such actions by the Board shall be subject to the applicable rules of the securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted. In any such case, the Board shall have all the authority granted to the Committee under the Plan.

(d)                 Awards.

(i)                   Agreements. Grants to Eligible Persons shall be evidenced by written Award Agreements in such form as the Committee shall from time to time determine (which Award Agreements need not be in the same form as any other Award Agreement evidencing Grants under the Plan and need not contain terms and conditions identical to those applicable to any other Grant under the Plan or to those applicable to any other Eligible Persons). Such Award Agreements shall comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions set forth below.

(ii)                 Number of Shares. Each Grant issued to an Eligible Person shall state the number of Shares to which it pertains or which otherwise underlie the Grant and shall provide for the adjustment thereof in accordance with the provisions of Section 15 hereof.

(iii)                Grants. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and consistent with the Company’s intention for the Committee to exercise the greatest permissible flexibility under Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act in awarding Grants, the Committee shall have the power:

(1)                 to determine from time to time the Grants to be issued to Eligible Persons under the Plan and to prescribe the terms and provisions (which need not be identical) of Grants issued under the Plan to such persons;

(2)                 to construe and interpret the Plan and the Grants thereunder and to establish, amend and revoke the rules, regulations and procedures established for the administration of the Plan. In this connection, the Committee may correct any defect or supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan, in any Award Agreement, or in any related agreements, in the manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary or expedient to make the Plan fully effective. All decisions and determinations by the Committee in the exercise of this power shall be final and binding upon the Participating Companies and the Grantees;

(3)                 to amend any outstanding Grant, subject to Section 17, and to accelerate or extend the vesting or exercisability of any Grant (in compliance with Section 409A of the Code, if applicable) and to waive conditions or restrictions on any Grants, to the extent it shall deem appropriate; and

(4)                 generally to exercise such powers and to perform such acts as are deemed necessary or expedient to promote the best interests of the Company with respect to the Plan.

Appendix A - 7

5.                   PARTICIPATION.

(a)                 Eligibility. Only Eligible Persons shall be eligible to receive Grants under the Plan.

(b)                 Limitation of Ownership. No Grants shall be issued under the Plan to any person who after such Grant would beneficially own more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company, unless the foregoing restriction is expressly and specifically waived by action of the independent directors of the Board.

(c)                 Stock Ownership. For purposes of Section 5(b) above, in determining stock ownership a Grantee shall be considered as owning the stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for his brothers, sisters, spouses, ancestors and lineal descendants. Stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for a corporation, partnership, estate or trust shall be considered as being owned proportionately by or for its stockholders, partners or beneficiaries. Stock with respect to which any person holds an Option shall be considered to be owned by such person.

(d)                 Outstanding Stock. For purposes of Section 5(b) above, “outstanding shares” shall include all stock actually issued and outstanding immediately after the issue of the Grant to the Grantee. With respect to the stock ownership of any Grantee, “outstanding shares” shall include shares authorized for issue under outstanding Options held by such Grantee, but not options held by any other person.

6.                   STOCK.

(a)                 Subject to adjustments pursuant to Section 15, the aggregate number of Fungible Units which may be subject to Grants made under the Plan shall equal 22,500,000 (the “Fungible Unit Limit”). In accordance with the Fungible Unit weighting mechanisms described in Sections 6(a)(i) - (ii) below for different Grant types, (x) a maximum of 3,600,000 Shares may be issued pursuant to Awards under the Plan if all such Grants made under the Plan are granted as Full Value Awards and (y) a maximum of 22,500,000 Shares may be issued pursuant to Grants under the Plan if all such Grants made under the Plan are granted as Options ((x) and (y), collectively, the “Share Limit”). The Share Limit with respect to Grants made shall range from 3,600,000 Shares to 22,500,000 Shares (but in no event more than 22,500,000 Shares) depending on the types of Grants actually granted under the Plan. The maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan following the Restatement Date pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options shall not exceed 22,500,000 Shares (or such lesser number as may be available under the Share Limit). Shares subject to Grants made shall be counted as follows:

(i)                   Awards of Options or other Grants that do not constitute Full Value Awards shall be counted against the Fungible Unit Limit as one Fungible Unit for every one (1) Share subject to such Option; and

(ii)                 Full Value Awards shall be counted against the Fungible Unit Limit as 6.25 Fungible Units for every one Share subject to such Full Value Award.

(b)                 Notwithstanding the first sentence of this Section 6, (i) Shares that have been granted as Restricted Stock or that have been reserved for distribution in payment for Options or Phantom Shares but are later cancelled, forfeited, terminated, settled in cash or otherwise settled without delivery to the Grantee of the full number of Shares to which the Grant related or for any other reason are not payable under the Plan; and (ii) Shares as to which an Option is granted under the Plan that remains unexercised at the expiration, forfeiture or other termination of such Option, may be the subject of the issue of further Grants; provided, however, that such Shares shall not become available for issuance hereunder if either: the applicable Shares are withheld or surrendered following termination of the Plan or at the time the applicable Shares are withheld or surrendered, it would constitute a material revision of the Plan subject to stockholder approval under any then-applicable rules of the national securities exchange on which the Shares are listed. Shares that have been (A) tendered as payment for the exercise of Options, (B) withheld to cover applicable taxes or (C) repurchased by the Company using the proceeds from the exercise of an Option shall not again be available for issuance hereunder. Shares shall be deemed to be used in settlement of a Full Value Award whether or not they are actually delivered or the Fair Market Value of such Shares is paid in cash. If any Shares subject to a Grant are forfeited or expire or such Grant is settled for cash (in whole or in part), the Shares subject to such Grant shall, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration or cash settlement, again be available for future Grants under the Plan and shall be added back to the Fungible Unit Limit (and correspondingly to the Share Limit) as the same number of Shares as would be debited from the Fungible Unit Limit (and correspondingly, the Share Limit) in respect of any such current Grant (as may be adjusted in accordance with Section 15 hereof). If any Shares subject to a Grant made before the Restatement Date are forfeited or expire or such Grant is settled for cash (in whole or in part), in any case following the Restatement Date, the Shares subject to such Grant shall, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration or cash settlement, again be available for future Grants under the Plan and shall be added back to the Fungible Unit Limit (and correspondingly to the Share Limit) as the same number of Shares as would be debited from the Fungible Unit Limit (and correspondingly, the Share Limit) set forth in the Plan in respect of any such current Grant (as may be adjusted in accordance with Section 15 hereof). Shares of Common Stock issued hereunder may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares, treasury shares or previously issued Shares under the Plan. The certificates for Shares issued hereunder may include any legend which the Committee deems appropriate to reflect any restrictions on transfer hereunder or under the Award Agreement, or as the Committee may otherwise deem appropriate. Shares subject to DERs, other than DERs based directly on the dividends payable with respect to Shares subject to Options or the dividends payable on a number of Shares corresponding to the number of Phantom Shares awarded, shall be subject to the limitation of this Section 6. Notwithstanding the limitations above in this Section 6, there shall be no limit on the number of Phantom Shares or DERs to the extent they are paid out in cash that may be granted under the Plan. If any Phantom Shares or DERs are paid out in cash, the underlying Shares may again be made the subject of Grants under the Plan, notwithstanding the first sentence of this Section 6.

Appendix A - 8

(c)                 Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Plan, the sum of any cash compensation and the grant date fair value (determined as of the date of the grant under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, or any successor thereto) of all Grants made under the Plan to a Non-Employee Director during any calendar year shall not exceed $500,000 (the “Director Limit”).

7.                   TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS.

(a)                 Each Award Agreement with an Eligible Person shall state the Exercise Price. The Exercise Price for any Option shall not be less than the Fair Market Value on the date of Grant. All Options granted under the Plan shall be Nonqualified Stock Options unless the applicable Award Agreement expressly states that the Option is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option.

(b)                 Medium and Time of Payment. Except as may otherwise be provided below, the Purchase Price for each Option granted to an Eligible Person shall be payable in full in United States dollars upon the exercise of the Option. In the event the Company determines that it is required to withhold taxes as a result of the exercise of an Option, as a condition to the exercise thereof, an Employee may be required to make arrangements satisfactory to the Company to enable it to satisfy such withholding requirements in accordance with Section 21. If the applicable Award Agreement so provides, or the Committee otherwise so permits, the Purchase Price may be paid in one or a combination of the following:

(i)                   by a certified or bank cashier’s check;

(ii)                 by the surrender of shares of Common Stock in good form for transfer, owned by the person exercising the Option and having a Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the Purchase Price, or in any combination of cash and shares of Common Stock, as long as the sum of the cash so paid and the Fair Market Value of the shares of Common Stock so surrendered equals the Purchase Price;

(iii)                by reduction of the Shares issuable upon exercise of the Option under a “net exercise” procedure effected by withholding the minimum number of Shares otherwise issuable in respect of an Option that is needed to pay the Exercise Price;

(iv)               by cancellation of indebtedness owed by the Company to the Grantee;

(v)                 subject to Section 17(e), by a loan or extension of credit from the Company evidenced by a full recourse promissory note executed by the Grantee. The interest rate and other terms and conditions of such note shall be determined by the Committee (in which case the Committee may require that the Grantee pledge his or her Shares to the Company for the purpose of securing the payment of such note, and in no event shall the stock certificate(s) representing such Shares be released to the Grantee until such note shall have been paid in full); or

(vi)               by any combination of such methods of payment or any other method acceptable to the Committee in its discretion.

Except in the case of Options exercised by certified or bank cashier’s check, the Committee may impose such limitations and prohibitions on the exercise of Options as it deems appropriate, including, without limitation, any limitation or prohibition designed to avoid accounting consequences which may result from the use of Common Stock as payment upon exercise of an Option. Any fractional shares of Common Stock resulting from a Grantee’s election that are accepted by the Company shall, in the discretion of the Committee, be paid in cash.

Appendix A - 9

(c)                 Term and Nontransferability of Grants and Options.

(i)                   Each Option under this Section 7 shall state the time or times which all or part thereof becomes exercisable, subject to the restrictions set forth in clauses (ii) through (v) below.

(ii)                 No Option shall be exercisable except by the Grantee or a transferee permitted hereunder. No Option shall be exercisable following the tenth anniversary of the date of grant of the Option.

(iii)                No Option or other Grant shall be assignable or transferable, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution of the state wherein the Grantee is domiciled at the time of his death.

(iv)               No Option shall be exercisable until such time as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement (but in no event after the expiration of such Grant).

(v)                 The Committee may not extend or renew any Option granted to any Eligible Person. Furthermore, the Committee may only modify an Option in connection with a Change in Control and only if such modification shall satisfy any and all applicable requirements of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and Section 409A of the Code, to the extent applicable. The foregoing notwithstanding, no modification of an Option shall, without the consent of the Optionee, alter or impair any rights or obligations under any Option previously granted.

(d)                 Termination of Service, other than by Death, Retirement or Disability. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, upon any Termination of Service for any reason other than his or her death, Retirement or Disability, an Optionee shall have the right, subject to the restrictions of Section 4(c) above, to exercise his or her Option at any time within three months after Termination of Service, but only to the extent that, at the date of Termination of Service, the Optionee’s right to exercise such Option had accrued pursuant to the terms of the applicable Award Agreement and had not previously been exercised; provided, however, that, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, if there occurs a Termination of Service by a Participating Company for Cause or a Termination of Service by the Optionee (other than on account of death, Retirement or Disability), any Option not exercised in full prior to such termination shall be cancelled.

(e)                 Death of Optionee. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, if the Optionee of an Option dies while an Eligible Person or within three months after any Termination of Service other than for Cause or a Termination of Service by the Optionee (other than on account of death, Retirement or Disability), and has not fully exercised the Option, then the Option may be exercised in full, subject to the restrictions of Section 4(c) above, at any time within 12 months after the Optionee’s death, by the Successor of the Optionee, but only to the extent that, at the date of death, the Optionee’s right to exercise such Option had accrued and had not been forfeited pursuant to the terms of the Award Agreement and had not previously been exercised.

(f)                  Disability or Retirement of Optionee. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, upon any Termination of Service for reason of his or her Disability or Retirement, an Optionee shall have the right, subject to the restrictions of Section 4(c) above, to exercise the Option at any time within 12 months after Termination of Service, but only to the extent that, at the date of Termination of Service, the Optionee’s right to exercise such Option had accrued pursuant to the terms of the applicable Award Agreement and had not previously been exercised.

(g)                 Rights as a Stockholder. An Optionee, a Successor of the Optionee, or the holder of a DER shall have no rights as a stockholder with respect to any Shares covered by his or her Grant until, in the case of an Optionee, the date of the issuance of a stock certificate for such Shares. No adjustment shall be made for dividends (ordinary or extraordinary, whether in cash, securities or other property), distributions or other rights for which the record date is prior to the date such stock certificate is issued, except as provided in Section 15.

(h)                 Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee, in its discretion, may (taking into account, without limitation, the application of Section 409A of the Code, as the Committee may deem appropriate), also permit the Optionee to elect to exercise an Option by receiving Shares, cash or a combination thereof, in the discretion of the Committee and as may be set forth in the applicable Award Agreement, with an aggregate Fair Market Value (or, to the extent of payment in cash, in an amount) equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of the Shares with respect to which the Option is being exercised over the aggregate Purchase Price, as determined as of the day the Option is exercised. No Option that is exercised as a stock appreciation right hereunder shall be exercisable following the tenth anniversary of the date of grant of the Option.

Appendix A - 10

(i)                   Deferral. The Committee may establish a program (taking into account, without limitation, the application of Section 409A of the Code, as the Committee may deem appropriate) under which Optionees will have Phantom Shares subject to Section 10 credited upon their exercise of Options, rather than receiving Shares at that time.

(j)                  Other Provisions. The Award Agreement authorized under the Plan may contain such other provisions not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan (including, without limitation, restrictions upon the exercise of the Option) as the Committee shall deem advisable.

8.                   SPECIAL RULES FOR INCENTIVE STOCK OPTIONS.

(a)                 In the case of Incentive Stock Options granted hereunder, the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the date of the Grant thereof) of the Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options become exercisable by any Optionee for the first time during any calendar year (under the Plan and all other plans) required to be taken into account under Section 422(d) of the Code shall not exceed $100,000.

(b)                 In the case of an individual described in Section 422(b)(6) of the Code (relating to certain 10% owners), the Exercise Price with respect to an Incentive Stock Option shall not be less than 110% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the day the Option is granted and the term of an Incentive Stock Option shall be no more than five years from the date of grant.

(c)                 If Shares acquired upon exercise of an Incentive Stock Option are disposed of in a disqualifying disposition within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code by an Optionee prior to the expiration of either two years from the date of grant of such Option or one year from the transfer of Shares to the Optionee pursuant to the exercise of such Option, or in any other disqualifying disposition within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, such Optionee shall notify the Company in writing as soon as practicable thereafter of the date and terms of such disposition and, if the Company thereupon has a tax-withholding obligation, shall pay to the Company an amount equal to any withholding tax the Company is required to pay as a result of the disqualifying disposition.

9.                   PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO RESTRICTED STOCK.

(a)                 Vesting Periods. In connection with the grant of Restricted Stock, whether or not Performance Goals apply thereto, the Committee shall establish one or more vesting periods with respect to the shares of Restricted Stock granted, the length of which shall be determined in the discretion of the Committee and set forth in the applicable Award Agreement. Subject to the provisions of this Section 9, the applicable Award Agreement and the other provisions of the Plan, restrictions on Restricted Stock shall lapse if the Grantee satisfies all applicable employment or other service requirements through the end of the applicable vesting period.

(b)                 Grant of Restricted Stock. Subject to the other terms of the Plan, the Committee may, in its discretion as reflected by the terms of the applicable Award Agreement: (i) authorize the granting of Restricted Stock to Eligible Persons; (ii) provide a specified purchase price for the Restricted Stock (whether or not the payment of a purchase price is required by any state law applicable to the Company); (iii) determine the restrictions applicable to Restricted Stock and (iv) determine or impose other conditions to the grant of Restricted Stock under the Plan as it may deem appropriate.

(c)                 Certificates.

(i)                   Each Grantee of Restricted Stock may be issued a stock certificate in respect of Shares of Restricted Stock awarded under the Plan. Any such certificate shall be registered in the name of the Grantee. Without limiting the generality of Section 6, in addition to any legend that might otherwise be required by the Board or the Company’s charter, bylaws or other applicable documents, the certificates for Shares of Restricted Stock issued hereunder may include any legend which the Committee deems appropriate to reflect any restrictions on transfer hereunder or under the applicable Award Agreement, or as the Committee may otherwise deem appropriate, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, shall bear a legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Grant, substantially in the following form:

THE TRANSFERABILITY OF THIS CERTIFICATE AND THE SHARES OF STOCK REPRESENTED HEREBY ARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS (INCLUDING FORFEITURE) OF THE RETAIL OPPORTUNITIES INVESTMENT CORP. AMENDED AND RESTATED 2009 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN, AND AN AWARD AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE REGISTERED OWNER AND RETAIL OPPORTUNITIES INVESTMENT CORP. COPIES OF SUCH PLAN AND AWARD AGREEMENT ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICES OF RETAIL OPPORTUNITIES INVESTMENT CORP. AT 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92130.

Appendix A - 11

(ii)                 The Committee may require that any stock certificates evidencing such Shares be held in custody by the Company until the restrictions hereunder shall have lapsed and that, as a condition of any grant of Restricted Stock, the Grantee shall have delivered a stock power, endorsed in blank, relating to the stock covered by such Grant. If and when such restrictions so lapse, the stock certificates shall be delivered by the Company to the Grantee or his or her designee as provided in Section 9(d).

(d)                 Restrictions and Conditions. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in an Award Agreement, the Shares of Restricted Stock awarded pursuant to the Plan shall be subject to the following restrictions and conditions:

(i)                   Subject to the provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, during a period commencing with the date of such Grant and ending on the date the period of forfeiture with respect to such Shares lapses, the Grantee shall not be permitted voluntarily or involuntarily to sell, transfer, pledge, anticipate, alienate, encumber or assign Shares of Restricted Stock awarded under the Plan (or have such Shares attached or garnished). Subject to the provisions of the applicable Award Agreement and clauses (iii) and (iv) below, the period of forfeiture with respect to Shares granted hereunder shall lapse as provided in the applicable Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise expressly provided by the Committee, the period of forfeiture with respect to such Shares shall only lapse as to whole Shares.

(ii)                 Except as provided in the foregoing clause (i), or in Section 15, the Grantee shall have, in respect of the Shares of Restricted Stock, all of the rights of a stockholder of the Company, including the right to vote the Shares and receive dividends. Certificates for Shares (not subject to restrictions hereunder) shall be delivered to the Grantee or his or her designee (or where permitted, transferee) promptly after, and only after, the period of forfeiture shall lapse without forfeiture in respect of such Shares of Restricted Stock.

(iii)                Termination of Service, Except by Death, Retirement or Disability. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, and subject to clause (iv) below, if the Grantee has a Termination of Service for Cause or by the Grantee for any reason other than his or her death, Retirement or Disability, during the applicable period of forfeiture, then (A) all Restricted Stock still subject to restriction shall thereupon, and with no further action, be forfeited by the Grantee, and (B) the Company shall pay to the Grantee as soon as practicable (and in no event more than 30 days) after such termination an amount equal to the lesser of (x) the amount paid by the Grantee for such forfeited Restricted Stock as contemplated by Section 9(b), and (y) the Fair Market Value on the date of termination of the forfeited Restricted Stock.

(iv)               Death, Disability or Retirement of Grantee. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, in the event the Grantee has a Termination of Service on account of his or her death, Disability or Retirement, or the Grantee has a Termination of Service by the Company for any reason other than Cause, during the applicable period of forfeiture, then restrictions under the Plan will immediately lapse on all Restricted Stock granted to the applicable Grantee.

10.                PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO PHANTOM SHARES.

(a)                 Grant of Phantom Shares. Subject to the other terms of the Plan, the Committee shall, in its discretion as reflected by the terms of the applicable Award Agreement: (i) authorize the Granting of Phantom Shares to Eligible Persons and (ii) determine or impose other conditions to the grant of Phantom Shares under the Plan as it may deem appropriate.

(b)                 Term. The Committee may provide in an Award Agreement that any particular Phantom Share shall expire at the end of a specified term.

(c)                 Vesting.

(i)                   Subject to the provisions of the applicable Award Agreement and Section 10(c)(ii), Phantom Shares shall vest as provided in the applicable Award Agreement.

(ii)                 Unless otherwise determined by the Committee in an applicable Award Agreement, the Phantom Shares granted pursuant to the Plan shall be subject to the following vesting conditions:

Appendix A - 12

(1)                 Termination of Service for Cause. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement and subject to clause (2) below, if the Grantee has a Termination of Service for Cause, all of the Grantee’s Phantom Shares (whether or not such Phantom Shares are otherwise vested) shall thereupon, and with no further action, be forfeited by the Grantee and cease to be outstanding, and no payments shall be made with respect to such forfeited Phantom Shares.

(2)                 Termination of Service for Death, Disability or Retirement of Grantee or by the Company for Any Reason Other than Cause. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, in the event the Grantee has a Termination of Service on account of his or her death, Disability or Retirement, or the Grantee has a Termination of Service by the Company for any reason other than Cause, all outstanding Phantom Shares granted to such Grantee shall become immediately vested.

(3)                 Except as contemplated above, in the event that a Grantee has a Termination of Service, any and all of the Grantee’s Phantom Shares which have not vested prior to or as of such termination shall thereupon, and with no further action, be forfeited and cease to be outstanding, and the Grantee’s vested Phantom Shares shall be settled as set forth in Section 10(d).

(d)                 Settlement of Phantom Shares.

(i)                   Except as otherwise provided by the Committee, each vested and outstanding Phantom Share shall be settled by the transfer to the Grantee of one Share; provided, however, that, the Committee at the time of grant (or, in the appropriate case, as determined by the Committee, thereafter) may provide that a Phantom Share may be settled (A) in cash at the applicable Phantom Share Value, (B) in cash or by transfer of Shares as elected by the Grantee in accordance with procedures established by the Committee or (C) in cash or by transfer of Shares as elected by the Company.

(ii)                 Each Phantom Share shall be settled with a single-sum payment by the Company; provided, however, that, with respect to Phantom Shares of a Grantee which have a common Settlement Date (as defined below), the Committee may permit the Grantee to elect in accordance with procedures established by the Committee (taking into account, without limitation, Section 409A of the Code, as the Committee may deem appropriate) to receive installment payments over a period not to exceed 10 years.

(iii)                (1) The settlement date with respect to a Grantee is the first day of the month to follow the Grantee’s Termination of Service (“Settlement Date”); provided, however, that a Grantee may elect, in accordance with procedures to be adopted by the Committee, that such Settlement Date will be deferred as elected by the Grantee to a time permitted by the Committee under procedures to be established by the Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, elections under this Section 10(d)(iii)(1) must be made at least six months before, and in the year prior to the year in which, the Settlement Date would occur in the absence of such election.

(2)                 Notwithstanding Section 10(d)(iii)(1), the Committee may provide that distributions of Phantom Shares can be elected at any time in those cases in which the Phantom Share Value is determined by reference to Fair Market Value to the extent in excess of a base value, rather than by reference to unreduced Fair Market Value, so long as such Phantom Shares constitute “exempt stock rights” under Section 409A of the Code.

(3)                 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Settlement Date, if not earlier pursuant to this Section 10(d)(iii), is the date of the Grantee’s death.

(iv)               Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan (taking into account, without limitation, Section 409A of the Code, as the Committee may deem appropriate), a Grantee may receive any amounts to be paid in installments as provided in Section 10(d)(ii) or deferred by the Grantee as provided in Section 10(d)(iii) in the event of an “Unforeseeable Emergency.” For these purposes, an “Unforeseeable Emergency,” as determined by the Committee (taking into account, without limitation, Section 409A of the Code, as the Committee may deem appropriate) in its sole discretion, is a severe financial hardship to the Grantee resulting from a sudden and unexpected illness or accident of the Grantee or “dependent,” as defined in Section 152(a) of the Code, of the Grantee, loss of the Grantee’s property due to casualty, or other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Grantee. The circumstances that will constitute an Unforeseeable Emergency will depend upon the facts of each case, but, in any case, payment may not be made to the extent that such hardship is or may be relieved:

(1)                 through reimbursement or compensation by insurance or otherwise;

Appendix A - 13

(2)                 by liquidation of the Grantee’s assets, to the extent the liquidation of such assets would not itself cause severe financial hardship; or

(3)                 by future cessation of the making of additional deferrals under Section 10(d)(ii) and (iii).

Without limitation, the need to send a Grantee’s child to college or the desire to purchase a home shall not constitute an Unforeseeable Emergency. Distributions of amounts because of an Unforeseeable Emergency shall be permitted to the extent reasonably needed to satisfy the emergency need.

(v)                 To the extent provided in an Award Agreement, the holder of Phantom Shares shall be entitled to be credited with DERs, as described in Section 11, below.

(e)                 Other Phantom Share Provisions.

(i)                   Rights to payments with respect to Phantom Shares granted under the Plan shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, attachment, garnishment, levy, execution, or other legal or equitable process, either voluntary or involuntary; and any attempt to anticipate, alienate, sell, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber, attach or garnish, or levy or execute on any right to payments or other benefits payable hereunder, shall be void.

(ii)                 A Grantee may designate in writing, on forms to be prescribed by the Committee, a beneficiary or beneficiaries to receive any payments payable after his or her death and may amend or revoke such designation at any time. If no beneficiary designation is in effect at the time of a Grantee’s death, payments hereunder shall be made to the Grantee’s estate. If a Grantee with a vested Phantom Share dies, such Phantom Share shall be settled and the Phantom Share Value in respect of such Phantom Shares paid, and any payments deferred pursuant to an election under Section 10(d)(iii) shall be accelerated and paid, as soon as practicable (but no later than 60 days) after the date of death to such Grantee’s beneficiary or estate, as applicable.

(iii)                The Committee may (taking into account, without limitation, Section 409A of the Code, as the Committee may deem appropriate) establish a program under which distributions with respect to Phantom Shares may be deferred for periods in addition to those otherwise contemplated by the foregoing provisions of this Section 10. Such program may include, without limitation, provisions for the crediting of earnings and losses on unpaid amounts and, if permitted by the Committee, provisions under which Grantees may select from among hypothetical investment alternatives for such deferred amounts in accordance with procedures established by the Committee.

(iv)               Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 10, any fractional Phantom Share will be paid out in cash at the Phantom Share Value as of the Settlement Date.

(v)                 No Phantom Share shall give any Grantee any rights with respect to Shares or any ownership interest in the Company. Except as may be provided in accordance with Section 11, no provision of the Plan shall be interpreted to confer upon any Grantee of a Phantom Share any voting, dividend or derivative or other similar rights with respect to any Phantom Share.

(f)                  Claims Procedures.

(i)                   The Grantee, or his beneficiary hereunder or authorized representative, may file a claim for payments with respect to Phantom Shares under the Plan by written communication to the Committee or its designee. A claim is not considered filed until such communication is actually received. Within 90 days (or, if special circumstances require an extension of time for processing, 180 days, in which case notice of such special circumstances should be provided within the initial 90-day period) after the filing of the claim, the Committee will either:

(1)                 approve the claim and take appropriate steps for satisfaction of the claim; or

(2)                 if the claim is wholly or partially denied, advise the claimant of such denial by furnishing to him or her a written notice of such denial setting forth: (A) the specific reason or reasons for the denial; (B) specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Plan on which the denial is based and, if the denial is based in whole or in part on any rule of construction or interpretation adopted by the Committee, a reference to such rule, a copy of which shall be provided to the claimant; (C) a description of any additional material or information necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of the reasons why such material or information is necessary; and (D) a reference to this Section 10(f) as the provision setting forth the claims procedure under the Plan.

Appendix A - 14

(ii)                 The claimant may request a review of any denial of his or her claim by written application to the Committee within 60 days after receipt of the notice of denial of such claim. Within 60 days (or, if special circumstances require an extension of time for processing, 120 days, in which case notice of such special circumstances should be provided within the initial 60-day period) after receipt of written application for review, the Committee will provide the claimant with its decision in writing, including, if the claimant’s claim is not approved, specific reasons for the decision and specific references to the Plan provisions on which the decision is based.

11.                PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO DIVIDEND EQUIVALENT RIGHTS.

(a)                 Grant of DERs. Subject to the other terms of the Plan, the Committee shall, in its discretion as reflected by the terms of the Award Agreements, authorize the granting of DERs to Eligible Persons based on the dividends declared on Common Stock, to be credited as of the dividend payment dates, during the period between the date a Grant that is a Full Value Award is issued, and the date such Grant vests or expires, as determined by the Committee. Such DERs shall be converted to cash or additional Shares by such formula and at such time and subject to such limitation as may be determined by the Committee. No DERs or dividends shall be earned, accrued or paid in respect of Options, or stock appreciation rights that are described in Section 7(h), that have not been exercised. If a DER is granted in respect of another Grant hereunder, then, unless otherwise stated in the Award Agreement, or, in the appropriate case, as determined by the Committee, in no event shall the DER be in effect for a period beyond the time during which the applicable related portion of the underlying Grant has been settled, or has expired, been forfeited or otherwise lapsed, as applicable.

(b)                 Certain Terms.

(i)                   The term of a DER shall be set by the Committee in its discretion.

(ii)                 Payment of the amount determined in accordance with Section 11(a) shall be in cash, in Common Stock or a combination of both, as determined by the Committee at the time of grant.

(c)                 Other Types of DERs. The Committee may establish a program under which DERs of a type whether or not described in the foregoing provisions of this Section 11 may be granted to Eligible Persons. For example, without limitation, the Committee may grant a DER with respect to a Phantom Share, which right would consist of the right (subject to Section 11(d)) to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to the dividend distributions paid on a Share from time to time.

(d)                 Deferral.

(i)                   The Committee may (taking into account, without limitation, Section 409A of the Code, as the Committee may deem appropriate) establish a program under which Grantees (i) will have Phantom Shares credited, subject to the terms of Sections 10(d) and 10(e) as though directly applicable with respect thereto, upon the granting of DERs, or (ii) will have payments with respect to DERs deferred.

(ii)                 The Committee may establish a program under which distributions with respect to DERs may be deferred. Such program may include, without limitation, provisions for the crediting of earnings and losses on unpaid amounts, and, if permitted by the Committee, provisions under which Grantees may select from among hypothetical investment alternatives for such deferred amounts in accordance with procedures established by the Committee.

12.                OTHER EQUITY-BASED AWARDS. The Board shall have the right to grant other awards based upon the Common Stock having such terms and conditions as the Board may determine, including without limitation, the grant of shares based upon certain conditions, the grant of securities convertible into Common Stock, including the grant of Long Term Incentive Units in any Subsidiary, operating partnership or other entity. Long Term Incentive Units may include “appreciation only” Long Term Incentive Units that include a right to settlement in cash or conversion into other property, in each case in an amount equal to the appreciation in value that has accreted with respect to the underlying Long Term Incentive Unit following the date on which the Long Term Incentive Unit was granted.

13.                PERFORMANCE GOALS. The Committee may, in its discretion (i) establish one or more performance goals (“Performance Goals”) as a precondition to the issue of Grants, and (ii) provide, in connection with the establishment of the Performance Goals, for predetermined Grants to those Grantees (who continue to meet all applicable eligibility requirements) with respect to whom the applicable Performance Goals are satisfied. The Performance Goals shall be based upon the criteria set forth in Exhibit A hereto which is hereby incorporated herein by reference as though set forth in full.

Appendix A - 15

14.                TERM OF PLAN. Grants may be granted pursuant to the Plan until the expiration of 10 years from the Restatement Date of the Plan.

15.                RECAPITALIZATION AND CHANGES OF CONTROL.

(a)                 Subject to any required action by stockholders and to the specific provisions of Section 16, if (i) the Company shall at any time be involved in a merger, consolidation, dissolution, liquidation, reorganization, exchange of shares, sale of all or substantially all of the assets or stock of the Company or a transaction similar thereto, (ii) any stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, stock combination, reclassification, recapitalization or other similar change in the capital structure of the Company, or any distribution to holders of Common Stock other than cash dividends, shall occur or (iii) any other event shall occur which in the judgment of the Committee necessitates action by way of adjusting the terms of the outstanding Grants, then:

(i)                   the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be made subject to Options and DERs under the Plan, the maximum aggregate number and kind of Shares of Restricted Stock that may be granted under the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Phantom Shares and other Grants which may be granted under the Plan may be appropriately adjusted by the Committee in its discretion; and

(ii)                 the Committee shall take any such action as in its discretion shall be necessary to maintain each Grantees’ rights hereunder (including under their applicable Award Agreements) so that they are, in their respective Options, Phantom Shares and DERs (and, as appropriate, other Grants under Section 12), substantially proportionate to the rights existing in such Options, Phantom Shares and DERs (and other Grants under Section 12) prior to such event, including, without limitation, adjustments in (A) the number of Options, Phantom Shares and DERs (and other Grants under Section 12) granted, (B) the number and kind of shares or other property to be distributed in respect of Options, Phantom Shares and DERs (and other Grants under Section 12), as applicable, (C) the Exercise Price, Purchase Price and Phantom Share Value, and (D) performance-based criteria established in connection with Grants; provided that, in the discretion of the Committee, the foregoing clause (D) may also be applied in the case of any event relating to a Subsidiary if the event would have been covered under this Section 15(a) had the event related to the Company.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of any “equity restructuring” (within the meaning of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (or any successor pronouncement thereto)), the Committee shall make an equitable or proportionate adjustment to outstanding Grants to reflect such equity restructuring.

To the extent that such action shall include an increase or decrease in the number of Shares (or units of other property then available) subject to all outstanding Grants, the number of Shares (or units) available under Section 6 above shall be increased or decreased, as the case may be, proportionately.

(b)                 Any Shares or other securities distributed to a Grantee with respect to Restricted Stock or otherwise issued in substitution of Restricted Stock pursuant to this Section 15 shall be subject to the applicable restrictions and requirements imposed by Section 9, including depositing the certificates therefor with the Company together with a stock power and bearing a legend as provided in Section 9(c)(i).

(c)                 If the Company shall be consolidated or merged with another corporation or other entity, each Grantee who has received Restricted Stock that is then subject to restrictions imposed by Section 9(d) may be required to deposit with the successor corporation the certificates for the stock or securities or the other property that the Grantee is entitled to receive by reason of ownership of Restricted Stock in a manner consistent with Section 9(c)(ii), and such stock, securities or other property shall become subject to the restrictions and requirements imposed by Section 9(d), and the certificates therefor or other evidence thereof shall bear a legend similar in form and substance to the legend set forth in Section 9(c)(i).

(d)                 The judgment of the Committee with respect to any matter referred to in this Section 15 shall be conclusive and binding upon each Grantee without the need for any amendment to the Plan.

(e)                 To the extent that the foregoing adjustment related to securities of the Company, such adjustments shall be made by the Committee, whose determination shall be conclusive and binding on all persons.

Appendix A - 16

(f)                  Except as expressly provided in this Section 15, a Grantee shall have no rights by reason of subdivision or consolidation of shares of stock of any class, the payment of any stock dividend or any other increase or decrease in the number of shares of stock of any class or by reason of any dissolution, liquidation, merger or consolidation or spin-off of assets or stock of another corporation, and any issue by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall not affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number of Shares subject to a Grant or the Exercise Price of Shares subject to an Option.

(g)                 Grants made pursuant to the Plan shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Company to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations or changes of its capital or business structure, to merge or consolidate or to dissolve, liquidate, sell or transfer all or any part of its business assets.

(h)                 Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control:

(i)                   The Committee as constituted immediately before the Change of Control may make such adjustments as it, in its discretion, determines are necessary or appropriate in light of the Change of Control (including, without limitation, the substitution of stock other than stock of the Company as the stock optioned hereunder, and the acceleration of the exercisability of the Options, cancellation of any Options or stock appreciation rights in return for payment equal to the Fair Market Value of Shares subject to an Option or stock appreciation right as of the date of the Change of Control less the exercise price applicable thereto (which amount may be zero) and settling of each Phantom Share or, as applicable, other Grant under Section 12), provided that the Committee determines that such adjustments do not have a substantial adverse economic impact on the Grantee as determined at the time of the adjustments.

(ii)                 Except as otherwise provided in an applicable Award Agreement, all restrictions and conditions on each DER shall automatically lapse and all Grants under the Plan shall be deemed fully vested.

(iii)                Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10, the Settlement Date for Phantom Shares shall be the date of such Change of Control and all amounts due with respect to Phantom Shares to a Grantee hereunder shall be paid as soon as practicable (but in no event more than 30 days) after such Change of Control, unless such Grantee elects otherwise in accordance with procedures established by the Committee.

16.                EFFECT OF CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS. In the case of (i) the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, (ii) a merger, consolidation, reorganization or other business combination in which the Company is acquired by another entity or in which the Company is not the surviving entity, or (iii) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of transactions contemplated or arranged by any party as a single plan) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, the Plan and the Grants issued hereunder shall terminate upon the effectiveness of any such transaction or event, unless provision is made in connection with such transaction for the assumption of Grants theretofore granted, or the substitution for such Grants of new Grants, by the successor entity or parent thereof, with appropriate adjustment as to the number and kind of shares and the per share exercise prices, as provided in Section 15. In the event of such termination, all outstanding Options and Grants shall be exercisable in full for at least fifteen days prior to the date of such termination whether or not otherwise exercisable during such period.

17.                SECURITIES LAW REQUIREMENTS.

(a)                 Legality of Issuance. The issuance of any Shares pursuant to Grants under the Plan and the issuance of any Grant shall be contingent upon the following:

(i)                   the obligation of the Company to sell Shares with respect to Grants issued under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including all applicable federal and state securities laws, and the obtaining of all such approvals by governmental agencies as may be deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee;

(ii)                 the Committee may make such changes to the Plan as may be necessary or appropriate to comply with the rules and regulations of any government authority or to obtain tax benefits applicable to stock options; and

(iii)                each grant of Options, Restricted Stock, Phantom Shares (or issuance of Shares in respect thereof) or DERs (or issuance of Shares in respect thereof), or other Grant under Section 12 (or issuance of Shares in respect thereof), is subject to the requirement that, if at any time the Committee determines, in its discretion, that the listing, registration or qualification of Shares issuable pursuant to the Plan is required by any securities exchange or under any state or federal law, or the consent or approval of any governmental regulatory body is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the issuance of Options, Shares of Restricted Stock, Phantom Shares, DERs, other Grants or other Shares, no payment shall be made, or Phantom Shares or Shares issued or grant of Restricted Stock or other Grant made, in whole or in part, unless listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval has been effected or obtained free of any conditions in a manner acceptable to the Committee.

Appendix A - 17

(b)                 Restrictions on Transfer. Regardless of whether the offering and sale of Shares under the Plan has been registered under the Act or has been registered or qualified under the securities laws of any state, the Company may impose restrictions on the sale, pledge or other transfer of such Shares (including the placement of appropriate legends on stock certificates) if, in the judgment of the Company and its counsel, such restrictions are necessary or desirable in order to achieve compliance with the provisions of the Act, the securities laws of any state or any other law. In the event that the sale of Shares under the Plan is not registered under the Act but an exemption is available which requires an investment representation or other representation, each Grantee shall be required to represent that such Shares are being acquired for investment, and not with a view to the sale or distribution thereof, and to make such other representations as are deemed necessary or appropriate by the Company and its counsel. Any determination by the Company and its counsel in connection with any of the matters set forth in this Section 17 shall be conclusive and binding on all persons. Without limiting the generality of Section 6, stock certificates evidencing Shares acquired under the Plan pursuant to an unregistered transaction shall bear a restrictive legend, substantially in the following form, and such other restrictive legends as are required or deemed advisable under the provisions of any applicable law:

“THE SALE OF THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (THE “ACT”). ANY TRANSFER OF SUCH SECURITIES WILL BE INVALID UNLESS A REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE ACT IS IN EFFECT AS TO SUCH TRANSFER OR IN THE OPINION OF COUNSEL FOR THE ISSUER SUCH REGISTRATION IS UNNECESSARY IN ORDER FOR SUCH TRANSFER TO COMPLY WITH THE ACT.”

(c)                 Registration or Qualification of Securities. The Company may, but shall not be obligated to, register or qualify the issuance of Grants and/or the sale of Shares under the Act or any other applicable law. The Company shall not be obligated to take any affirmative action in order to cause the issuance of Grants or the sale of Shares under the Plan to comply with any law.

(d)                 Exchange of Certificates. If, in the opinion of the Company and its counsel, any legend placed on a stock certificate representing Shares sold under the Plan is no longer required, the holder of such certificate shall be entitled to exchange such certificate for a certificate representing the same number of Shares but lacking such legend.

(e)                 Certain Loans. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Company shall not be required to take or permit any action under the Plan or any Award Agreement which, in the good-faith determination of the Company, would result in a material risk of a violation by the Company of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act.

18.                COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 409A OF THE CODE.

(a)                 Any Award Agreement issued under the Plan that is subject to Section 409A of the Code shall include such additional terms and conditions as may be required to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

(b)                 With respect to any Grant issued under the Plan that is subject to Section 409A of the Code, and with respect to which a payment or distribution is to be made upon a Termination of Service, if the Participant is determined by the Company to be a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code and any of the Company’s stock (or the stock of a controlled group affiliate thereof) is publicly traded on an established securities market or otherwise, such payment or distribution may not be made before the date which is six months after the date of Termination of Service (to the extent required under Section 409A of the Code).

(c)                 Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Board and the Committee shall administer the Plan, and exercise authority and discretion under the Plan, to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code or any exemption thereto.

Appendix A - 18

19.                AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN. The Board may from time to time, with respect to any Shares at the time not subject to Grants, suspend or discontinue the Plan or revise or amend it in any respect whatsoever. The Board may amend the Plan as it shall deem advisable, except that no amendment may adversely affect a Grantee with respect to Grants previously granted unless such amendments are in connection with compliance with applicable laws; provided, however, that the Board may not make any amendment in the Plan that would, if such amendment were not approved by the holders of the Common Stock, cause the Plan to fail to comply with any requirement of applicable law or regulation, or of any applicable exchange or similar rule, unless and until the approval of the holders of such Common Stock is obtained. Notwithstanding the foregoing, without stockholder approval, except as otherwise permitted under Section 15 of the Plan, (i) no amendment or modification may reduce the Exercise Price of any Option; (ii) the Committee may not cancel any outstanding Option and replace it with a new Option (with a lower Exercise Price) or other Grant or cash payment that is greater than the intrinsic value (if any) of the cancelled Option; and (iii) the Committee may not take any other action which is considered a “repricing” for purposes of the stockholder approval rules of any securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system on which the securities of the Company are listed or quoted.

20.                APPLICATION OF FUNDS. The proceeds received by the Company from the sale of Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of an Option, the sale of Restricted Stock or in connection with other Grants under the Plan will be used for general corporate purposes.

21.                TAX WITHHOLDING. Each Grantee shall, no later than the date as of which the value of any Grant first becomes includable in the gross income of the Grantee for federal income tax purposes, pay to the Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Company regarding payment of any federal, state or local taxes of any kind that are required by law to be withheld with respect to such income. A Grantee may elect to have such tax withholding satisfied, in whole or in part, by (i) authorizing the Company to withhold a number of Shares to be issued pursuant to a Grant equal to the Fair Market Value as of the date withholding is effected that would satisfy the withholding amount due, (ii) transferring to the Company Shares owned by the Grantee with a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of the required withholding tax, or (iii) in the case of a Grantee who is an Employee of the Company at the time such withholding is effected, by withholding from the Grantee’s cash compensation. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Plan to the contrary, the Grantee’s satisfaction of any tax-withholding requirements imposed by the Committee shall be a condition precedent to the Company’s obligation as may otherwise be provided hereunder to provide Shares to the Grantee, and the failure of the Grantee to satisfy such requirements with respect to a Grant shall cause such Grant to be forfeited.

22.                NOTICES. All notices under the Plan shall be in writing, and if to the Company, shall be delivered to the Board or mailed to its principal office, addressed to the attention of the Board; and if to the Grantee, shall be delivered personally or mailed to the Grantee at the address appearing in the records of the Participating Company. Such addresses may be changed at any time by written notice to the other party given in accordance with this Section 22.

23.                RIGHTS TO EMPLOYMENT OR OTHER SERVICE. Nothing in the Plan or in any Grant issued pursuant to the Plan shall confer on any individual any right to continue in the employ or other service of the Participating Company (if applicable) or interfere in any way with the right of the Participating Company and its stockholders to terminate the individual’s employment or other service at any time.

24.                EXCULPATION AND INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless the members of the Board and the members of the Committee from and against any and all liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by such persons as a result of any act or omission to act in connection with the performance of such person’s duties, responsibilities and obligations under the Plan, other than such liabilities, costs and expenses as may result from the gross negligence, bad faith, willful misconduct or criminal acts of such persons.

25.                NO FUND CREATED. Any and all payments hereunder to any Grantee under the Plan shall be made from the general funds of the Company (or, if applicable, a Participating Company), no special or separate fund shall be established or other segregation of assets made to assure such payments, and the Phantom Shares (including for purposes of this Section 25 any accounts established to facilitate the implementation of Section 10(d)(iii)) and any other similar devices issued hereunder to account for Plan obligations do not constitute Common Stock and shall not be treated as (or as giving rise to) property or as a trust fund of any kind; provided, however, that the Company (or a Participating Company) may establish a mere bookkeeping reserve to meet its obligations hereunder or a trust or other funding vehicle that would not cause the Plan to be deemed to be funded for tax purposes or for purposes of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The obligations of the Company (or, if applicable, a Participating Company) under the Plan are unsecured and constitute a mere promise by the Company (or, if applicable, a Participating Company) to make benefit payments in the future and, to the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments under the Plan from the Company (or, if applicable, a Participating Company), such right shall be no greater than the right of a general unsecured creditor of the Company (or, if applicable, a Participating Company). Without limiting the foregoing, Phantom Shares and any other similar devices issued hereunder to account for Plan obligations are solely a device for the measurement and determination of the amounts to be paid to a Grantee under the Plan, and each Grantee’s right in the Phantom Shares and any such other devices is limited to the right to receive payment, if any, as may herein be provided.

Appendix A - 19

26.                NO FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIP. Nothing contained in the Plan (including without limitation Section 10(e)(iii)), and no action taken pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, shall create or shall be construed to create a trust of any kind, or a fiduciary relationship between the Company, the Participating Companies, or their officers or the Committee, on the one hand, and the Grantee, the Company, the Participating Companies or any other person or entity, on the other.

27.                CAPTIONS. The use of captions in the Plan is for convenience. The captions are not intended to provide substantive rights.

28.                GOVERNING LAW. THE PLAN SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS.

Appendix A - 20

PROXY

 

RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.

201811250 El Camino Real, Suite 200

San Diego, California 92130

2021 Meeting of Stockholders – April 25, 2018

Offices of Clifford Chance US LLP

31 West 52nd St., New York, New York 1001926, 2021

 

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY

 

The undersigned stockholder of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), hereby appoints Stuart A. Tanz and Michael B. Haines, or either of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Meeting”) of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. (the “Company”)the Company to be held via a live webcast at http://www.viewproxy.com/ROIREIT/2021/vm at 1:30 p.m., Eastern time on April 25, 2018 at the offices of Clifford Chance US LLP, 31 West 52nd Street, New York, New York 10019,26, 2021, and any postponement or adjournment thereof, to cast on behalf of the undersigned all votes that the undersigned is entitled to cast at the Meeting and to otherwise represent the undersigned at the Meeting with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present virtually at the Meeting. By signing this proxy, the undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting and of the accompanying Proxy Statement, the terms of which are incorporated by reference herein.

Please register in advance to attend virtually using the following link: http://www.viewproxy.com/ROIREIT/2021

 

THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF THIS PROXY IS EXECUTED BUT NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT AND “FOR” ITEMSPROPOSALS 2 3 AND 4.3. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDER ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY POSTPONEMENT OR ADJOURNMENT THEREOF.

 

continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side

 

▲ PLEASE DETACH ALONG PERFORATED LINE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. ▲

 

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 1:30 p.m., EASTERN time, on April 25, 2018.26, 2021. The Proxy Statement and our 20172020 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at: http://www.viewproxy.com/roireit/20182021

 

 

 

 

-1-

 

 

Please mark your votes like this ☒

THE COMPANY’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW AND “FOR” ITEMSPROPOSALS 2 3 AND 4.

3.		Please mark your votes like this ☒
 
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

FOR

ALL

WITHHOLD

FOR ALL

FOR ALL

EXCEPT

  FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
Nominees:

01 Richard A. Baker

02 Angela K. Ho

03 Michael J. Indiveri

03 Edward H. Meyer

04 Lee S. Neibart

05 Charles J. Persico

06 Laura H. Pomerantz

07 Stuart A. Tanz

08 Eric S. Zorn

☐☐☐ 

3. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in the 2018 Proxy Statement.

☐☐☐
4. Approval of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.☐☐☐

(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual, mark, “For All Except” and write the nominee’s name(s) on the line below.)

FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
2. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021.☐☐☐

(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual, mark, “For All Except” and write the nominee’s name(s) on the line below.)

 3. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in the 2021 Proxy Statement.☐☐☐
      

I plan on attending the meeting via live webcast at http://www.viewproxy.com/ROIREIT/2021/vm

☐

DO NOT PRINT IN THIS AREA

(Stockholder Name & Address Data)

THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE, “FOR” ITEMSPROPOSALS 2 3 AND 43 AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY POSTPONEMENT OR ADJOURNMENT THEREOF.

DO NOT PRINT IN THIS AREA

(Stockholder Name & Address Data)

  

Date: _____________________________________________________________________

 

Signature

 

Signature (if held jointly)

Address Change/Comments: (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark the box.) ☐CONTROL NUMBER

NOTE: This proxy should be marked, dated and signed by each stockholder exactly as such stockholder’s name appears hereon, and returned promptly in the enclosed envelope. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as an executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign the full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If the signer is a partnership, please sign in the partnership’s name by authorized person.

 

 

Address Change/Comments: (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark the box.) ☐  CONTROL NUMBER 
 

▲▲PLEASE DETACH ALONG PERFORATED LINE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. ▲
 

CONTROL NUMBER

  
  

PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

Please have your 11-digit control number ready when authorizing your proxy to vote by Internet or Telephone

 

   

INTERNET

Vote Your Proxy on the Internet:

Internet up until April 25, 2021 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time: Go to www.AALvote.com/ROIC

Have your proxy card available when you access the above website. Follow the prompts to vote your shares.

TELEPHONE

Vote Your Proxy by Phone:

Call 1 (866) 804-9616

Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy.proxy up until April 25, 2021 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time. Have your proxy card available when you call.

Follow the voting instructions to vote your shares.

MAIL

Vote Your Proxy by Mail:

Mark, sign, and date your proxy card, then detach it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.provided

 

 

-2-